Is using these unethical if you have not read the book? I have a quiz this week on a very long book (about 60% through). Would reading these for the rest of the book be cheating? It just bugs me and I don't know weather I can do it or not.
I wouldn't call it cheating. But your prof probably knows people use them and will potentially quiz on things not covered in/more specific than sparknotes/clifnotes summaries.
I wouldn't call it cheating. But your prof probably knows people use them and will potentially quiz on things not covered in/more specific than sparknotes/clifnotes summaries.
Personally, I could never use sparknotes in place of the actual book. Their summaries are pretty horrible. The only thing I use them for is refreshing my memory about a certain chapter or something.
I wouldn't call it cheating. But your prof probably knows people use them and will potentially quiz on things not covered in/more specific than sparknotes/clifnotes summaries.
Personally, I could never use sparknotes in place of the actual book. Their summaries are pretty horrible. The only thing I use them for is refreshing my memory about a certain chapter or something.
Both of these are valid points. Usually, Cliff Notes/Spark Notes covers the general themes and basic plot of the book, so while I don't believe it would be cheating to use these resources to help you study, it may not be beneficial to you to use them as your only source of information.
I wouldn't call it cheating. But your prof probably knows people use them and will potentially quiz on things not covered in/more specific than sparknotes/clifnotes summaries.