- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Medical
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I graduated with a PhD in neuroscience a few months ago. After dabbling in medical writing and teaching (which I love!), I'm thinking of finally going to medical school. I have a lot of questions, some of which I've gotten answered via the FAQs, but not all.
My entire PhD was based around human subjects (well, we called them participants) research. I did all the recruiting, testing, data analysis, etc. of my participants. Some of these were ostensibly normal, but interesting, people while others were patients with PD. My testing was all neuropsych and visual perception; I never had to diagnose or cure anyone. (I also completed my dissertation and I'm working on publishing papers).
How would this be viewed in the realm of clinical experience? On the one hand, I certainly interacted with patients a lot more than someone who spent most of their time running errands for doctors. On the other hand, a research lab in an office building is different from a hospital. The last time I spent significant time in a hospital, I was working IT for it. 🙂
My entire PhD was based around human subjects (well, we called them participants) research. I did all the recruiting, testing, data analysis, etc. of my participants. Some of these were ostensibly normal, but interesting, people while others were patients with PD. My testing was all neuropsych and visual perception; I never had to diagnose or cure anyone. (I also completed my dissertation and I'm working on publishing papers).
How would this be viewed in the realm of clinical experience? On the one hand, I certainly interacted with patients a lot more than someone who spent most of their time running errands for doctors. On the other hand, a research lab in an office building is different from a hospital. The last time I spent significant time in a hospital, I was working IT for it. 🙂