Clinical medicine and pathology -- all that different?

Started by b&ierstiefel
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

B

b&ierstiefel

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
A while ago, sacrament (nickname sac, or nutsac) expressed his opinions about pathology. One point he made was that signout was not all that different from rounding. His post was genius and hilarious and we actually have his post tacked on a bulletin board (with the label, "Read...Funny." or something to that effect) for all to see.

I agree with a lot of the things he said and I wanted to make a point by point comparison between surgical pathology and clinical medicine just for fun and kicks (and maybe to rant just a tad).

I. Patient presentation:

Clinical medicine - patient comes into the ER or clinic with a complaint.

Pathology - a specimen arrives at your grossing bench.

II. Initial evaluation:

Clinical medicine - well, of course, you look up the history on the patient and then proceed to do an H&P. Your findings will guide management of the patient.

Pathology - Well, you can't really take a history since fragments of tissue or organs or tumors can't really talk back at you. So that comparison is moot. But you will look up the history to see why the specimen landed on your bench to begin with. This will guide how you examine the specimen and what details you will focus on and look for (kinda like doing a physical exam on the specimen).

III. Evaluation by attending (signout) / Rounds

Clinical medicine - OK, so your patient is admitted to the floors. You put in orders and the patient is tucked for the evening. The next morning, you pre-round and then you and the attending go over the patient presentation and physical findings.

Pathology - OK, so you describe the specimen and then you submit relevant sections for histologic evaluation. You preview the slides (kinda like prerounding) and then the next morning, you show the slides to the attending at signout with your impressions.

IV. Dispo

Clinical medicine - After rounding, you make the decision to: (1) run more tests; (2) discharge the patient; (3) consult various services (aka run around the hospital to find various attendings) to guide management. Sometimes you have to go back to the patient to get more history or try to elicit more physical findings.

Pathology - At signout, you can: (1) simply sign out the case with a diagnosis (that's the best case scenario cuz you discharge the case from your queue); (2) go back to the bucket to submit more specimen (this f*cking blows; you're not discharging the case 👎 ); (3) put in orders for some of the sections to be examined via immunohistochemistry or special stains (i.e., gram stain, AFB, fungal stain, mucicarmine, etc) or request additional levels for some sections (i.e., you're still not discharging the case 👎 ); or (4) consult various services (aka run around trying to find the attendings to show the slides; you're STILL not discharging the case and it stays in your queue 👎 ). (See Note).

Note: Now now, before all you patient care enthusiasts start getting sand in your vaginas, let me say this. Further work up is important and, in many cases, inevitable. The goal is to provide the clinicians with the best diagnosis so that they can go back to the patient and make the right management decisions. The responsibility we have as pathologists is very VERY humbling.

V. Discharge

Clinical medicine - Yeah, you better try to do this quickly because in a few days your team will be entertaining new admits to your service and you don't want your queue to get longer and longer. But in any case, when you discharge your patient, he/she is gone! Yippee!

Pathology - The bucket of the now macerated specimen is stored. The slides are filed. Your queue gets shorter. And everybody is happy. Of course, by this point, you're probably getting a new batch of specimens to keep the cycle going.

VI. So you've made it! You're the attending and you wear the daddy pants!

Clinical medicine - You don't spend all day on the floors. Why? Cuz you got residents doing all the scut for you! The residents will update you as need be.

Pathology - After signout, you're done! Why? Cuz you got residents doing all the scut for you! The residents will bring the new slides or consult info to you and all you have to do is, "OK, good job" and signout the case!

----------

Reflections, Conclusions, Perspectives:

Some of us pathologists cite not having to do an internship year as one of the many reasons to do pathology residency. Reality check - it's not all that different from clinical medicine. When you are on surgical pathology, you are still a scut bitch who runs around doing ****. You ARE an intern. Except, it's not limited to one year. You're doing this stuff whenever you're on a busy surgical pathology service. And at times, it can be good. And at other times, it can simply blow donkey balls.

Hi, my name is Andy Milonakis. I am an intern. I am everybody's bitch and I seriously need a f*cking vacation.
 
yaah said:
You order mucicarmine? That's for suckers! 😉
OK man, I'm on the edge and you're really pushing the wrong buttons! When I get back to your neck of the woods in a few weeks, I'm gonna find you and unload some of dat mucicarmine all over your damn white coat! (and then run).

Just outta curiosity...what do you use instead of mucicarmine. Mucicarmine does kinda suck...you're looking for pink in a sea of yellow/grey. Doesn't make things stand out that much.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
AndyMilonakis said:
Just outta curiosity...what do you use instead of mucicarmine. Mucicarmine does kinda suck...you're looking for pink in a sea of yellow/grey. Doesn't make things stand out that much.

You use your eyes and the H&E 😉 Kidding, well sort of. It often doesn't add much to the diagnosis.
 
Beautiful Rant and excellent comparison except for TWO important things....

1) You dont have to followup and tweak medications for the path specimen...

2) You dont have an ungrateful SOB of a specimen cursing at YOU for making IT'S life a misery after all the hardwork you put into it....

🙂 🙂

That, my friend, makes everything worthwhile! :laugh: :laugh:
 
quant said:
Beautiful Rant and excellent comparison except for TWO important things....

1) You dont have to followup and tweak medications for the path specimen...

2) You dont have an ungrateful SOB of a specimen cursing at YOU for making IT'S life a misery after all the hardwork you put into it....

🙂 🙂

That, my friend, makes everything worthwhile! :laugh: :laugh:
Oh totally...there are some crucial differences which are to be appreciated too.

yaah said:
You use your eyes and the H&E Kidding, well sort of. It often doesn't add much to the diagnosis.
OK wiseass 😉

I agree.
 
I tell you though, sometimes you get these cases that linger and don't go away, kind of like the patient who gets septic then gets pneumonia then a dvt then can't go home because they are so deconditioned and then you find a liver mass.

Sometimes you have a case where you put through sections, then it gets delayed because histo loses a block, then you don't have enough diagnostic sections so you have to go back and put more in, then you need to run immunos to clarify things, then you need an immuno that you don't have and you have to send the block to Mayo, then the attending goes away to a conference and someone else takes over and orders more immunos, and all the time the clinicians are calling, then the patient gets a new biopsy or new clinical info and your impression changes, then a new article comes out in AJSP and changes your staging, then you go to tumor board and the clinicians inform you of something that would have been helpful early on, then you get the slides from an outside hospital from their biopsy material 5 years ago which has issues because it is missing the diagnostic slide and there is a large floater on the other key slide. It goes on like this.
 
yaah said:
I tell you though, sometimes you get these cases that linger and don't go away, kind of like the patient who gets septic then gets pneumonia then a dvt then can't go home because they are so deconditioned and then you find a liver mass.

Sometimes you have a case where you put through sections, then it gets delayed because histo loses a block, then you don't have enough diagnostic sections so you have to go back and put more in, then you need to run immunos to clarify things, then you need an immuno that you don't have and you have to send the block to Mayo, then the attending goes away to a conference and someone else takes over and orders more immunos, and all the time the clinicians are calling, then the patient gets a new biopsy or new clinical info and your impression changes, then a new article comes out in AJSP and changes your staging, then you go to tumor board and the clinicians inform you of something that would have been helpful early on, then you get the slides from an outside hospital from their biopsy material 5 years ago which has issues because it is missing the diagnostic slide and there is a large floater on the other key slide. It goes on like this.

Oh don't get me started :laugh:

Let me give you a snapshot as to how one case went:

1) Get levels.
2) Order impox.
3) Order more impox.
4) Submit more tissue.
5) Order impox.
6) Submit more tissue.
7) Get more levels on a previous slide unrelated to 6).
8) Oh, better get impox on that too.
9) Finally, signed the case out today.
 
Oh, then there's the infamous lymph node hunt from a 100 cm segment of ass that has been irradiated.

Day 1 - Cut in colon specimen. Strip off fat. Say, "F*ck it! I'll deal with the damn nodes tomorrow."
Day 2 - Search for nodes. You're not really confident about any of the lymph node candidates you end up submitting but you think, "Maybe the gods will shine on me this day and I'll be lucky."
Day 3 - Preview all slides. Only 3 out of the 30 random fragments of ass node candidates end up being actual ass nodes.
Day 4 - Bring case to signout. He say, "Go back to bucket!" "Yes sir! May I have another sir!"
Day 4 (continued) - submit more ass node candidates.
Day 5 - receive slides...you've found only 2 more nodes! Clinicians page you all day since the case hasn't been signed out yet. You want to jam sharp pencil in ear.
Day 6 - you tell attending, "sorry, only 2 more." "Well 5 ain't good enough. Search again!" "Yes sir! Immediately sir! May I get you a coffee and donuts, SIR!"
Day 6 (continued) - submit entire fat in 427 cassettes. This case has been discharged! No more back to bucket! Andy says to colon, "I will end you!"
 
AndyMilonakis said:
Day 1 - Cut in colon specimen. Strip off fat. Say, "F*ck it! I'll deal with the damn nodes tomorrow."
...
Day 6 (continued) - submit entire fat in 427 cassettes. This case has been discharged! No more back to bucket! Andy says to colon, "I will end you!"
Is "submit entire fat in 469 cassettes on Day 1" a viable alternative?
 
AndyMilonakis said:
Andy says to colon, "I will end you!"

Wow. Ever seen that movie Cabin Boy? I think in that movie someone actually says this to their colon. It would be crazy if the colon said back something like "No b*$%^ch! I will end YOU!"

I'm tired...someone take the keyboard out of my hands...
 
AndyMilonakis said:
no

that's what the clinicians would want because clinicians think pathology residents are lazy sacks of **** who never even come close to working 80 hours per week.

we don't let the clinicians dictate what we do and don't do at work...especially when it comes down to grossing!

That and the attending on the case would totally freak out and show his REAL ULTIMATE POWER!!! and cut your head off for having to look at 469 slides of ass.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
UCSFbound said:
That and the attending on the case would totally freak out and show his REAL ULTIMATE POWER!!! and cut your head off for having to look at 469 slides of ass.
exactly.
 
Yeah but the odd thing is you sometimes never know. Generally, within about 2 minutes of cutting through colon fat you know whether this is going to be one of "those cases" or not, but you still have to look. I had one where I thought I found none, and praise Virchow when the slides came out there were 9 one mm blue dots scattered in my five blocks of fat. Other times not so lucky.

****ing boob service reminds me of clinical medicine. Everything is oriented with three stitches that do not geometrically make sense. As in - the suture marking the deep margin is directly across from the suture marking the lateral margin, and in between them is the stitch marking the superficial anterolateral margin. And they all supposedly have a metal clip in them representing prior biopsy site that you have to find and submit the tissue around it. Well, one of two things tend to happen in this case:

1) The whole specimen is scarred and you can't find the tiny clip without sectioning everything at 0.5mm intervals, which is impossible.

2) There is no clear biopsy cavity OR metal clip, just some vague fibrous tissue which may or may not represent a scar.

It also feels like clinical medicine because everything is tinged with evidence based medicine. We have sentinel nodes which have a specific protocol for sectioning, and in signout we have to provide the evidence-based medicine (at least according to some people) way of arbitrarily assigning a grade to the tumor.

+pissed+ Suck my balls, breast service!
 
deschutes said:
Whazza difference? You're going to have to ULTIMATELY do it anyway 😉 😛 You're just prolonging the agony by a coupla days.

Thats where the similarities with clinical medicine continue. Its like the senior resident on the medicine service who starts the ordering imaging studies (when he knows that the attending will want them) in order to get the patient the f*ck off the service, and then gets chastised for no apparent reason other than said attending didnt order them. Remember that path attendings still pwn their own residents (insert scutmonkeys) too. You gotta pick your battles. I was told of a case where a resident submitted like 39 blocks of omentum, and needless to say, the path attending was not happy about looking at 2 flats of that garbage. I would rather error on the conservative side and submit less tissue, and be told to go back to the bucket. But yes, you are correct in stating that most of the time you ultimately go back to the bucket for seconds, which inevitably causes you much grief (ie clinicians) with regard to that case sitting on your worklist for like a week instead of 2-3 days.
 
yaah said:
You order mucicarmine? That's for suckers! 😉

Mucicarmine is sweet. Some pathologists actually like to differentiate mucinous vs. nonmucinous adenoca's..And in Cali. we have a little organism called cryptococcus, very helpful stain overall.
 
UCSFbound said:
I would rather error on the conservative side and submit less tissue, and be told to go back to the bucket.
Maybe I could hide 400 of the 469 slides and bring them out at the appropriate time...

We're on the same side of the fence here, I'm just eager to play devil's advocate for some reason this week.
 
Sure, path and clinical medicine have some parallels, but what does that really mean? Hell, just compare the histo lab to what goes on behind the counter at Arby's.

The bottom line for me is that no matter how irritating path can be at times, I will never have to get up at 4:00 AM, drive to the hospital, and ask the refrigerated BKA's if they've farted since the last rounds. And for that I thank the good Lord every day.
 
deschutes said:
Maybe I could hide 400 of the 469 slides and bring them out at the appropriate time...

We're on the same side of the fence here, I'm just eager to play devil's advocate for some reason this week.

Sounds like a plan to me. Wish I has thought of that a couple of months ago :idea: