- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 0
While reading interview feedback for AZCOM I notice that some people say it's open file and some say theirs was closed file. I haven't had a closed file interview yet. Would it be better to bring up any academic weak spots? This would give them an idea of what "happened" during that time so that when/if they see it later (i.e. in the decision room) they'll have an explanation for it. Or would that just make waves where none are needed?