MD & DO co'21 Residency Panic thread
Started by kraskadva
I did 16 in person interviews last year... it was terrible lol
Kudos to you....How did you manage to schedule 16 interviews in person? I only have 17 so far scheduled...and I already waitlist and cancel some because of schedule conflict.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Their numbers might be inflated by the tiny programs that take like 2/year. I didn’t apply to those. Nothing against them. I just didn’t like the location of most of them and didn’t want to end up in a situation where I’m the only resident in a class. But I applied pretty realistically overall.
Residents and fellows I know told me I’d get love from the few big name programs I’m interested in. But I’d love to just get some love from my local state program.
Talk about humbling.
I certainly wouldn't begrudge them of trying to diversify radiology. It needs improved, sure. The regional thing I don't buy as much. I did at first but now I'm questioning it. As I said, it's been strange.This might not be the most PC thing to admit, but it's possible that PDs are filtering for other demographic data in addition to AOA/step scores/geographic ties/etc. At one of the virtual open houses earlier this summer, a PD explicitly mentioned that they were planning on recruiting more students from URM groups. For example, women traditionally make up a third or a quarter of the applicant pool, but a program may decide to give half of all of their interview slots to women to match a more diverse class.
I'm just bringing this up because I've gotten DR/IR interviews at some uber-reach programs that I didn't expect, especially this early. I feel pretty good about my stats and my app overall, but you know, imposter syndrome and all that
There is a low tier program in a state next door with zero reason to think my app wasn't sincere to their program or that I wouldn't live there/rank it... Radio silence. And then I get my goal program on first day it sent invites. It makes no sense.
Keep in mind i had a longer timeline. I believe my first interview was like 10/1 or 10/2 and last one was close to the last week of January. It was exhausting and i had at least one three interview week in there.
I have an EM interview Jan. 21st
Regional is HUGE in my opinion. All of my most competative IIs are either near where I went to med school, college, or grew up.
I get doing a few more interviews this year than one would feel comfortable with normally. It's a weird year. I also understand doing a lot if you truly see yourself possibly going to all of them.
But hoarding when there are some that you definitely won't go to and have enough that you like? Seems kind of useless.
My top 3 most competitive are in different corners of the country haha. I did get some good safety hits from regional though.
But hoarding when there are some that you definitely won't go to and have enough that you like? Seems kind of useless.
My top 3 most competitive are in different corners of the country haha. I did get some good safety hits from regional though.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Yeah. Don't tell school squat. I agree.
Ditto. It's one of the one's I'm thinking of cancelling, and will decide for sure by Nov. 22 to leave time for them to reschedule someone else.
OB/Gyn interview release day. I have interviews, but so does everyone else like me with similar stats. I really don't want to hoard interviews, but I am paranoid.
I don't think there is such a thing as "interview hoarding". PD's will interview who they want to interview. It's going to be a strange year and your only job as an MS4 is to make sure that you get the job that you want as a PGY-1. Would think twice about cancelling interviews because you're "tired" or "don't feel like it". There are worse things than having to sit through another interview or two. There's a lot of judgment getting passed to people on twitter for applying to more places or interviewing at more places, but this is probably the astute thing to do in a year like this. Nobody knows how its going to play out in the end.
Literally two hours ago I said to not post personal attacks or insults. One user has been warned and a post deleted. If your response to something is an insult, say it to yourself and then don’t post it.
Ya I think over 1/2 my II’s I don’t have regional connections to.
I think DR programs are looking at stats/home/Sub-I peeps first and then best fit (some may perceive this as regional connections)
Just a guess tho idfk
Or PM the user directly lol. Sometimes the user on the receiving end REALLY REALLY deserves it.
Keep in mind PMs can be reported too, and content there that violates the TOS will also be moderated. 😉
We should start advising high schoolers going into pre-med to do college and med school in different areas of the country lol, Northeast, California and Southeast in some order should do it.
I agree w you. People name and shame those who got a lot of interview...but not matching is the worst thing that can happen. I have classmate who did not match, became depressed and miserable. Even if you re apply and dual apply to some lower speciality, the # of interviews that you will get decrease exponentially. I did not know that until now. You never know if you will match for sure even if you go to a lot of interviews, but I definitely will not want to take chance because some people will hate me...I am hoarding interviews because guess what? They may be the ones who match and I don’t...n will they be around to support and comfort me? Nope!!! Even worse, is if you cancel interviews, go unmatched and end up living the rest of your life wondering what if you went to those interview...I also saw this happened before...unfortunately
There are two sides of this with no perfect solution...but not matching is a terrible thing to happen. The person who gets a lot of interview no doubt work harder than the one who don’t. You can’t say the top people put in the same amount of work than the lower people. It would be nice if the people who have a lot of interview cancel them if they reach certain number...but you can not hate and be pissed of if they don’t. It is life unfortunately...I don’t live my life hating the top people at my school or people at Stanford because they work for their scores and resume.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Gross. Just super gross. Glad to know I’m a “lower person” and “didn’t work hard” because I don’t have 20+ interviews. I worked my @$$ off. And I’m definitely a worthwhile person. Maybe things come easier to some.
The idea that you must work harder if you have more interviews is just so...wrong.
Good god this isn’t true. Check yourself and your privilege. So many things go into getting interviews and assuming someone didn’t work as hard because they haven’t gotten as many is incredibly naive and, quite frankly, a horrible way to think about other people/future doctors.
How can you measure how hard someone worked when you have spent literally zero time in their shoes? Also, how do you know that the people with more interviews are the ones that have the highest stats aka "WoRkEd HaRdEr"? There is no one formula for getting lots of interviews. I know people super low stats with lots of interviews and people with incredible stats with very few interviews as well. It happens get over yourselves guys.
I’m making my decisions based on the worst case scenario....be careful when asserting that people with more IIs work harder on average. We’re in an echo chamber of participation trophy kids who can’t handle being told they aren’t the absolute best. They say things like “we all worked hard” even though there are huge differences in work ethic and productivity among medical students. This kind of crap is meant to equalize us as applicants, but there are always people better than you and worse than you.
I am what you call... a "lower person". I have 20+ interviews. I can say I did not work as hard as some of my classmates. I dont know how you can be so wrong. Good luck on your interviews. And like I told you before, I'm sure PDs will see your humble and open attitude.
I did not say you all did not work hard lol...I don't rank top of my class...and I don't just sit here and say hateful things to the people who do and have a lot of interviews. I respect them. They for sure work harder than me. At least for the top person in my class. She had one of the most disciplined and studied her butt off to be top...
I don't know if you ever do research on the top people...I do. Their resumes are mind blowing. They work harder to get those "more interviews"...I am jealous but at the same time, I have a lot of respect for all those people. I am not saying it is right to hoard interviews. But if they work for it...they deserve it...I respect them...
You, again, have no idea what youre talking about.
Dang the entitlement in some of these posts...
My anecdote is from last year so less relevant..
But, i had an application that screamed FM. My step 1 was garbage... it was a 211 and i will be the first to admit i didnt work nearly hard enough first or second year. I got 32 interviews. It isn’t all about “working hard”. Hell, “working hard” is subjective.
How about we stop this elitist nonsense and just hear each other out? We’re in a panic thread with people who have single digit interview numbers... be sympathetic before saying they’d have more if they had worked harder.
Geez.
My anecdote is from last year so less relevant..
But, i had an application that screamed FM. My step 1 was garbage... it was a 211 and i will be the first to admit i didnt work nearly hard enough first or second year. I got 32 interviews. It isn’t all about “working hard”. Hell, “working hard” is subjective.
How about we stop this elitist nonsense and just hear each other out? We’re in a panic thread with people who have single digit interview numbers... be sympathetic before saying they’d have more if they had worked harder.
Geez.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Are you telling me those scores higher on steps and more research don't work harder? We all work hard...I have no doubt...I would not go to the extend saying I work as hard as the people who score top of my class. They definitely work harder than me to get there
I realize it's a really stressful year but attributing 20+ interviews to working harder is insulting and arrogant. Why can't we support each other instead and not arrogantly downplay and insult others' difficulties?
I’m not a “participation trophy kid”, I’m in my mid 30s. And I’ve certainly never heard of SDN being an echo chamber of “lesser people”.
I have zero problem saying I’m not the smartest in my class. Or “best”. But you will not insult my work ethic.
We all work hard. Some people just have the mental ability to get over the hump. Hard work does not equate interviews. I have 15 and I'm SUPER average, and I honestly didn't work as hard as half the people in my class
Are you telling me the people who get higher scores and research don't get more interviews especially at the top programs? Again I am not saying you all don't work hard...but you have to admit some people in your class rank top because they work harder...Those people usually match better at top specialties or programs. This is a tough year. Everyone are scared. I just don't feel like it is right to judge people because they hoard interviews. That is my 2 cents.
I think it is better to respect each other and try to see things from different sides. At the end....good luck to everyone and hope we all match.
Hoarding interviews can be avoided if application caps were enforced
Yeah we’ve beat this horse long enough so I’m not going to point out the obvious points here.
A
AnatomyGrey12
Wtf is going on in this thread?
You're absolutely absurd and have zero idea what you're talking about.
2 people who feel the need to troll is all. I have history with teh one in another spot haha
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Do you guys think the residency process can be improved by:
1. Banning all PD "you'll be ranked #1" or "stop interviewing elsewhere" and other false hope communication
2. Setting and enforcing application caps?
1. Banning all PD "you'll be ranked #1" or "stop interviewing elsewhere" and other false hope communication
2. Setting and enforcing application caps?
Just trying to spot common problems so far and thinking how to improve
I think ENT token system is the way to do it.
Michael Jackson eating popcorn.
"I think it is better to respect each other while I also say that you peasants are lower people because you don't have as many interviews as me, the most righteous and magnificent applicant that I am...and at the end...good luck to everyone, including you lower people and i hope we will all match"
This thread is helpful to many of us and is a tradition on SDN. Stop ruining it. You and @underthesun are being silly. There's nothing wrong with saying that you disagree with people passing on interview invites and you think people should in fact hoard interviews. That's a fair opinion to have. But when you start bashing other applicants, that's obnoxious.
#2 for sure. Application caps would be so much better for everyone. The programs for sure, because they won't be drowning in a sea of applications to review. And the applicants because it'll force them to really do their research on programs and apply much more strategically, rather than some shotgun approach. I think it's also fair to think that with app caps, programs will be less reliant on filters like Step 1 >260 or whatever.
I would love this!
(Correct me if I’m wrong people)
For anybody who doesn’t know, ENT applicants can mark the apps of the places they are most excited to apply to or something along those lines. And they are limited to doing it to a certain amount of apps. I think this would really help in years like this one.
5:50 am interview invite this morning is definitely earlier than I was expecting 
This is good to hear (with regard to me being in the same boat). Waiting for the "trickle" or the "second wave" is anxiety provoking and it is uncertain if it will even occur. By all accounts, I too should be doing much better in DR than I currently am.
Best of luck. Hang in there.
What inclusive, equity-driven language should we be using to describe applicants with lower stats? Perhaps “numerically disadvantaged individuals”? Neither one of us have inferred that those with low stats are somehow lower as human beings. He did use that language at first but I think it was a product of a language barrier which is obvious by reading his posts. There are people that are lower and higher in terms of competitiveness. I don’t think that’s an offensive observation.
Just world fallacy working overtime in this thread.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
