im half way done with college. just have physics left as far as pre-med reqs. had no idea what i wanted to major in when i started college. still don't. no 1 department really intrigues me.
my question:
right now i have like a 3.6ish science gpa and 3.7ish cum gpa (1.1 apart). since i'm not necessarily committed to any one major in particular, i'm wondering what others think might benefit me most: biology vs non science. i feel like my science gpa could be higher, but i got a fair amount of B's in freshman year. since then i've been doing better in sciences.
they real key is that i want and plan to take a few upper level biology courses in order to minor in it regardless. i'm just not sure if, for gpa purposes, i should go the whole way, double those courses, and major in it. the reason for my distress is that i constantly hear people say: if you're going to major in a non-science, you better have stellar grades in your science courses. on the other hand, my cum gpa will undoubtedly be higher if i major in a non-science (based on the 2 years behind me).
Thanks for reading.
my question:
right now i have like a 3.6ish science gpa and 3.7ish cum gpa (1.1 apart). since i'm not necessarily committed to any one major in particular, i'm wondering what others think might benefit me most: biology vs non science. i feel like my science gpa could be higher, but i got a fair amount of B's in freshman year. since then i've been doing better in sciences.
they real key is that i want and plan to take a few upper level biology courses in order to minor in it regardless. i'm just not sure if, for gpa purposes, i should go the whole way, double those courses, and major in it. the reason for my distress is that i constantly hear people say: if you're going to major in a non-science, you better have stellar grades in your science courses. on the other hand, my cum gpa will undoubtedly be higher if i major in a non-science (based on the 2 years behind me).
Thanks for reading.
Last edited: