- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
- Messages
- 671
- Reaction score
- 0
So, after looking at the ADA guide as to how AA is calculated, it got me thinking.
So AA is the average of all non-PAT sections. And does not consider TS. As well, the difference between a 29/30 and 30/30 on chem and ochem is as much as 5 points.
Would it not be better to spend more time on genchem and ochem and leave biology last, even if you do not have enough time to finish it? Aim to get a 30. If you do, your AA will be boosted significantly higher than if you got 2 more correct in biology, lets say 37/30 as opposed to 35/30 (since it will be only +1 or +2 to biology section) compared to if you spend more time in chemistry and get that +5 going from 29/30 to 30/30?
So basically, you are sacrificing a point in TS for a higher AA, which is more important, right?
I have heard people running out of time on the chemistries too, so....
My thinking is that you should always start with the chemistries and leave Bio until last. Thoughts?
So AA is the average of all non-PAT sections. And does not consider TS. As well, the difference between a 29/30 and 30/30 on chem and ochem is as much as 5 points.
Would it not be better to spend more time on genchem and ochem and leave biology last, even if you do not have enough time to finish it? Aim to get a 30. If you do, your AA will be boosted significantly higher than if you got 2 more correct in biology, lets say 37/30 as opposed to 35/30 (since it will be only +1 or +2 to biology section) compared to if you spend more time in chemistry and get that +5 going from 29/30 to 30/30?
So basically, you are sacrificing a point in TS for a higher AA, which is more important, right?
I have heard people running out of time on the chemistries too, so....
My thinking is that you should always start with the chemistries and leave Bio until last. Thoughts?