DOs & gas seem to be a hot topic these days. Whilst on the interview/application circuit this last cycle, I encounter 1 program that was snooty about interviewee selection: Univ of VA. I had actually visited the place & was quite impressed...I have good friend there who is a surgical resident & she loves the place. However, when I applied, I was placed in the "hold for an interview" pile. They sent out invites only to folks with USMLEs >240 or COMLEX > 90th %-ile (those are the numbers as best as I recall them). Initially I was disappointed, but then I realized that I was not too hip on training in place that place so much value on a single parameter of my huge application file.
My USMLE step 1 was the average for that administration...something like 210~213 or whatever...my COMLEX was 72nd %-ile. Since I was uncertain as to how guage my net competitiveness, I defaulted on applying to a "large" number of programs - 25 - in order to hopefully land that magical 10 interviews. I was far more successful than anticipated & ended up with 4 rejections, 17 invitations & 4 no replies. I interviewed at some very highly rated programs: Dartmouth, Univ of Rochester, Penn St (I did not apply to any of the NYC or Boston programs - did not want to live there) & Univ of FL...I turned down an invitation to UChicago.
So, even with not stellar numbers, I was very successful. I matched to Dartmouth - my first choice. The point of my reply is not to toot my own horn or to instill a false sense of security into those with 'big numbers'. My intent is to heavily emphasize that your board scores, while a very important screening parameter, is not your application in toto.
The initial interview invitation screen is generally comprised of your board scores, your 3rd year clerkship grades, your CV (the ERAS thingie you fill out) & your letters of recommendation. It is the SUM of these elements that get you invited, wait-listed or rejected.
Residency directors, in most cases, are not just out hunting bright boys & girls to make their name look pretty. Pragmatically, the faculty, staff & house officers will have to spend many looooooooooooooooong hours with you over the next x-number of years. Once you have demonstrated the capacity to succeed under the rigors of med school, be a self-initiated learner & that you have the intellectual capacity to be a physician...the things that ring most important in their ears is: Can we all get along with him/her for the duration of the program? Will this candidate be an asset or a boat anchor? Will my ass chap at the end of a call shift merely by being around this person?
So, yes - board scores are critically important. However, do not over-focus on boards to the point that you neglect the other equally critical aspects of your application. Just like when you applied to med school, an MCAT >35 + a GPA > 3.6 did not guarantee you a seat...high board scores does not guarantee an awesome residency slot.
Lastly, forget about all of the MD vs DO hype. If a program truly seeks to have the best people that it can attract, then that is a moot point. I suspect that many DO-grads-to-be attempt to hide behind this alleged controversy. It is far easier to point a finger at some extraneous, uncontrollable variable than to simply accept the fact that they did not do what they had to do to be the most competitive applicant that they could be. That is a harse statement, but I have unfortunately seem too many DO students attempt to hide behind this pitiful excuse for underperformance. Such BS minimizes the accomplishments of the other students who get out there, bust their asses & achieve what is allegedly unobtainable.
The things you want are within your grasp if you are willing to honor the commitment, make the sacrifices and do the work...it is your decision.