I have promised myself that when I passed, I am going to write about my experience with this horrid exam! Please bear with me as it will be long. Also, I will be trying my absolute best to make sure that there will be no mention of cases that I have seen during my exam. However, if there are, please tell me so I can remove it.
To pass this exam, you should know its rule! It is not that important as many people passed without knowing it. However, for those who failed, I hope this will be helpful! Also, please take whatever I said with caution, regardless of everything I failed it the first time!
First thing first, I failed my first attempt with the Biomechanical/ Biomedical domain, supposedly the easier part of the exam and I felt greatly devastated by it! I talked to my Dean and during one of our conversations, he made a mention that I took it as an afternoon at an IM clinic and he said that this is not a correct mindset! He said to look at it as a game in which your objective is to get as many points as you can. The only problem is that it is subjective and you have no clue what actions are considered acceptable for points!
So, when I studied again for the PE, I decided to view it as a game as my Dean said. And every gamer knows (I am a very committed gamer) that all games, even subjective ones, have rules. I just have to figure out the rules. How did I do it? I am embarrassed to say that I read up on all their pseudo-research papers regarding their PE and their master blueprint to figure out what they want from me!
1. Let us talk about how you will be graded in this exam! As you all know that there are 2 components to this exam:
Humanism | Biomechanical and Biomedical domain |
1. Professionalism | 1. Data gathering |
2. Inter patient-doctor communication and relationship | 2. OMT |
3. Communication and listening skills etc... | 3. Soap note |
HUMANISM
According to this research paper (1), regarding humanism, it is scored by the SP using the global patient assessment tool, a holistic Likert-type scoring instrument regarding the following qualities professionalism, respect, eliciting information, giving information, empathy and listening. Where did I get all these qualities from? a. it is in the research paper.
Then what is a Likert-scale? It is a really basic scale either 1-5 or 1-7 used commonly for surveys where 7 often strongly agrees and 1 strongly disagrees. What does it mean then for the PE? I speculated that after our encounter and during 9 minutes, the SPs will filling out surveys similar to this below:
On the scale from 1 to 7, where 7 (or 5) means you agree strongly and 1 means you disagree strongly to the following the statements:
1. The applicants expressed respect in dealing with me and were mindful of my dignity and modesty in their actions
2. So on and so forth regarding all the qualities
Therefore, I am of the opinion that there is actually no checklist at all for the Humanism component. It is just a personality survey. It is why I believe there are so much speculation on what would appear on the checklist because the checklist never existed in the first place. It is why I reckon why there are so many different people who keep saying the following and they still passed: Never summarized the HPI (me included), forgot to wash hands on many stations, forgot to introduce self or announced the SP names etc and etc...
On the other hand, since it is a personality survey, it is also why there are so many people who swear that they did all the above and still failed the humanistic component! My conclusion is that it is not whether you have done it or not that matters, it is
how you do it that matters!!!
So, my speculation about it is that even if you were to do every little thing in existence, you will still fail humanism if you were being robotic, rude or being an dingus about it! So, I will now issue my blanket statement that you will not fail Humanism if you are a candidate that SPs want to hug at the end of the encounter.
So, go in there and give them the sweetest and fakest smile and voices you can summon (it doesn't the matter that it is fake, so is OMT and so is the PE). If the SPs are not diabetic by the end, you are doing it wrong.
Back to the topic of scoring then, after you did all 12 encounters, your survey scores of each component from each encounter will be averaged over 12 and added up together to give you your total composite grade. You will pass if you are over their cutoff.
BIOMEDICAL
This is what I failed on and I am still pissed over it. If you have read my previous posts, I failed on Data gathering and Soap note. Again, according to this research paper (1), data gathering is scored by the SPs on a percentage metric based on the number of history questions and PE maneuvers correctly performed during the encounter and Soap notes are scored by attendings once again using a Likert-type holistic instrument. While OMT is scored by another attending using a different Likert-type holistic tool.
Data Gathering: As you have read above, this is what can arguably be said to the most objective of the whole exam. The best way for us to attack this section then is to gather as many points as we can when we are in the room with the SP. Once again, when we exit the encounter, the SPs must be busy filling out case-specific checklists. For example, did the candidate ask about constipation? If so, did the candidate follow up with whether there is blood in stools? So on and so forth! Your first job then is to ask as many questions as you can (but be mindful of time limit and your humanism points as you may annoy the SPs), you will not be penalized at all if you asked wrong questions and just as well, you will not be penalized at all you forgot to ask something. You will just not be rewarded points. My opinion is that SPs are not trained in medicine so they would not know what is critical to ask! Your second job is to help the SPs to check the boxes for you by asking each question slowly, clearly and one by one. You don't want the SPs to forget that you ask the questions because you were unclear or disorganized! The same thing, I believe, should also apply to the Physical Exam maneuvers! Your first job, once again, is to do as much as you can regarding your case so that you can be awarded all the points! Your second job, again, is to help the SPs to check all the boxes for you by announcing as loud and clear as you can on what you are doing so that there is no confusion!
OMT: It is graded by attendings using likert-scale by watching our video. I am not going to delve much into OMT as by this point, we all should know how to mime and fake our way thought OMT! My motto throughout med school so far regarding OMM is to fake it till I make it and so far I am still faking it. My only advice is to do at least a couple of justifiable OMT. You will want to get as high a grade as possible in this section to compensate for any poor forms in other sections. I know we all love to bash OMT. I do too. However, in this exam, it is the only part of exam that you hold the answers and, more importantly,
you can make up your answers!!! As long as your technique is okay (please hide your hands) and you announce loud and clear what you are doing for the mic, you should be able to get points easily from this section. You just want the attendings to think you are half-competent, by 4th year we should be good at faking ourselves in front of the attendings. So, don't be terrified of these stations, they are your best friends here.
SOAP Note: This is also graded by attendings and is graded again subjectively. You do not need to write the most perfect IM-inpatient note ever! It just has to be sane, logical, full-sentences and
honest. You only want the attendings, when they read your notes, to give you a 4 or 5 on their survey scales. I speculated that the grading they use most likely have things like:
On the scale from 1 to 7, where 7 (or 5) means you agree strongly and 1 means you disagree strongly to the following the statements:
1. This note is logical and comprehensible
2. You understand the candidates' decision-making process from this note
Therefore, and again it is only my speculation, it is why we can make so many mistakes with SOAP notes and still passed. It is the compensatory effect of the other 2 components as well as the fact that attendings believe that they can see potential in you to write notes for them in the future! As a ref case, I made a big mess of 2 of my notes completely: 1. One note I had nothing at all in SMASHFH FEDTACOS. 2. The other note's subjective must have been one ugly pig; I have misspelled so much in the CC, HPI and ROS. I created a new surgical procedure for my patient that did not exist before then. I mislabeled the drug name. I did not get to write down the FH and SH where they were pertinent for the case! People can attest that I was really freaking out about these mistakes!
Lastly, you cannot talk about SOAP without talking about mis-documentation or fraud! My advice is don't do it! It is not worth it and you guys know attendings' personalities in real life, they hate it. Even if they will not mark you down fraud, they might just fail your note just because they hate it!!! It is better to have lower rating that failing the note completely by missing to do something rather than faking it.
Regarding grade then from the Biomedical domain, each component will have their average over 12 encounters and then sum up to give your final global grade. This then will compare to the cutoff for pass or fail of this section.
I hope that this has been helpful and explain the principle and rule of this exam!
Ref:
Relationships between high-stakes clinical skills exam scores and program director global competency ratings of first-year pediatric residents
I will talk more about misrepresentation, how I prepare for mine and my mistakes and what cases you can expect to have (don't worry I will not talk about my cases, I will only talk about what I learned from reading the papers and their blueprints) when I have more time and my fingers less aching!