Concerning Formatting of Publications/Presentations

[SnarfTCat]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Full citations take up a lot of space. I've got four posters/presentations and a book chapter so I'm not sure how to split that up either. I don't know if I should separate them based on whether or not I was first author or what. A previous post had a simple format, but the application has since changed. How much information should I include? Do I detail my research at all or just sort of make it easy to recognize and move on?

 

[Vans42]

Full citations take up a lot of space. I've got four posters/presentations and a book chapter so I'm not sure how to split that up either. I don't know if I should separate them based on whether or not I was first author or what. A previous post had a simple format, but the application has since changed. How much information should I include? Do I detail my research at all or just sort of make it easy to recognize and move on?

I'm not sure if this will help, but I had two posters and a publication with 4 years of research at two different institutions (gaps years). I just did two categories for the two different research projects, explaining what I did, and then did a different category for pubs and presentations. I didn't even use full citations though (one paper was accepted but not published yet), but I gave locations and dates of conferences and dates, journal names, and titles for pubs. I got interviews so it probably didn't hurt me.

 

[SnarfTCat]

Did you include enough authors to establish your place in the lineup?

 

[Vans42]

Did you include enough authors to establish your place in the lineup?

I was first author on the posters, and I said that I was third author on the paper. But I didn't say out of how many.