- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
46% of candidates did not pass CP boards this year. Isn't that amazing.
GOOD LUCK
GOOD LUCK
46% of candidates did not pass CP boards this year. Isn't that amazing.
GOOD LUCK
please indulge me here, but what exactly does it mean to pass one's boards? is it required to practice? get you a better salary? help you place into a fellowship? or is it just something that's nice to do, but doesn't really make a huge difference on a day to day basis? i've seen ads for jobs in various specialties saying they want a board certified/eligible physician, which makes me think that actually passing the boards is not required.
as to the original comment - yeah, that's a pretty scary-low pass rate - does anyone have info whether the pass rate is similarly low in other areas of medicine?
I know you're somewhat of a hit-and-fade, but where did you get this info?46% of candidates did not pass CP boards this year. Isn't that amazing.
I knew when I left Tampa that I failed CP, but that clinches it.
You have to pass boards to practice and sign out cases, as far as I'm aware.
All someone legally needs to sign-out cases is a medical license, I think. And as far as I know, people have no trouble getting hospital privileges and being reimbursed as board-eligible pathologists. If you loose your board eligible status, then you probably will have trouble keeping your job, billing certain insurance companies, and getting hospital privileges.
I'm not that worried about the 50% fail rate. I scored a 261 on step 1 a number of years ago, and I am sure that is the top 1% of all medical students. Surely, I haven't slipped up to the point where I am in the bottome 50% of pathologists in terms of being able to learn a body of material and then take a multiple choice test on the subjects.
I'm not that worried about the 50% fail rate. I scored a 261 on step 1 a number of years ago, and I am sure that is the top 1% of all medical students. Surely, I haven't slipped up to the point where I am in the bottome 50% of pathologists in terms of being able to learn a body of material and then take a multiple choice test on the subjects.
Oh yeah, sure.
Actually with Step I scores like that you can just take a pass on Path Boards. Just let them know, actually if you give them you MCAT and SAT scores, they might just start giving you those big paychecks you are wanting...
Not sure if your friend Vince Vaughn will be the one who gives them to you.
![]()
That score is NOT the top 1% of medical students (maybe 2-5%) , and then you have to cut off whatever % fail, because if they never pass they aren't taking boards.
The year I took it I think the Mean was 216 with an SD of 17, so I was for sure 2.5 units of S.D over the mean. A score of 261 5-6 years ago was for sure in the top 1% of the country. I rocked the SAT, I rocked MCAT, I rocked the USMLE exams why wouldn't I rock Path boards (or at least be better than half of the applicants)?
But a pass rate of 50% suggests mere random chance rather than knowledge base.
I rocked the SAT, I rocked MCAT, I rocked the USMLE exams
However, if the purpose is simply to make $$$ for the abpath, this is a marvelous method.
However, if the purpose is simply to make $$$ for the abpath, this is a marvelous method.
Maybe it was 46% of repeat test takers or something.
That sounds more plausible, although who knows. I saw a Fred Silva lecture back in 2004 that presented board pass rate data. Failure rate first time takers was around 30%, and for second timers it is was around 50%.
And I did: 2001-05
Failure rates
CP Total 35.11% First timers 25.43% Repeaters 59.52%
The year I took it I think the Mean was 216 with an SD of 17, so I was for sure 2.5 units of S.D over the mean. A score of 261 5-6 years ago was for sure in the top 1% of the country. I rocked the SAT, I rocked MCAT, I rocked the USMLE exams why wouldn't I rock Path boards (or at least be better than half of the applicants)?
btw, that elitist and entitled attitude won't play real well out in the real world.
Wow. How very impressive. Please allow me to introduce a little concept that I like to refer to as reality. I have been doing this for a while now and I know many folks who have taken the AP/CP and various subspecialty exams. I can say in all certainty that ANYONE is capable of failing this exam. It is nothing like the SAT, MCAT, or USMLE that you performed so scarry well on. This is a bear of a test, in all probablity the single hardest exam in all of medicine. I have seen incredibly bright and accomplished (far more accomplished than those above stats, btw) people fail (at least) one part of the AP/CP. Conversely, I have seen more than a few less than impresive individuals pass on their first attempt. So, please don't post your cv assuming that someone as scarry smart as you simply has to just show up and breeze right through this. You very well may be shocked.
btw, that elitist and entitled attitude won't play real well out in the real world.
It is not an elitist attitude. It is just one of self-confidence and not cockiness. I have consistently scored at the top of all "multiple choice" tests I have ever taken. Why would the boards be any different? It is the hardest test, but it is the hardest for everybody. Why would I go from always being in the top 2-3% to being in the bottom 30%? And it is not because I am the smartest, it is because I have a knack for multiple choice tests. Plus I am already studying for the boards and in my last year I'll study until my nuts are bloody.
Well, everybody here has passed CP boards so far that took it this past year. The letter doesn't include anything except "congratulations" if you passed, no score breakdown or % passing or anything.
Apparently it doesn't - isn't that weird? What people say is that it only breaks down each category with percentile if you FAIL, not if you pass. If you pass, all you get is "congratulations." I haven't actually seen a letter but I doubt people are lying to me...
My hemepath results had the breakdown with highest third, middle third, and lowest third for each section. If you remember red cell disorders as one of the sections, you may be remembering your hemepath results.Eh? The letter should breakdown each CP and AP category along with a %le rank, the top being top25%le. I cant remember the exact wording, but something like:
Clinical Pathology......overall score: Highest Quartile
Red Cell Disorders......................Highest Quartile
etc. something like that anyway.
No way, yes there is an official appearing letter that says congrats but there is a whole packet of stuff you get. That is like 1 page of 5-6 if I remember right.
My hemepath results had the breakdown with highest third, middle third, and lowest third for each section. If you remember red cell disorders as one of the sections, you may be remembering your hemepath results.
For AP/CP boards the year before, they sent a sheet with the sections in order of what I did best. There were no indications of how I performed relative to others taking the test.
Just to clarify, they did report by top third, etc. (tertile?), my performance relative to others taking the heme exam. Maybe they are just changing the format of the report from year to year.This is correct. When you pass, they tell you had you did on different areas relative to yourself. They do not indicate your percentile relative to the other test takers.
Just to clarify, they did report by top third, etc. (tertile?), my performance relative to others taking the heme exam. Maybe they are just changing the format of the report from year to year.
So for the record, the 2004 AP/CP report only ranked sections by what I did best and what I did worst. The 2005 heme report told me how I did relative to other test takers.