- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
What do you guys think? I need your opinions...
snobored18 said:Ok I'm partial so I shouldn't be answering this...but being from the midwest and having seen both these schools before (I declined a creighton interview but I've been through their medical center and boys town) I can still give you a comment. Creighton isn't in the same league and you probably know that...while i think rankings are ******ed and shouldn't be ones basis for a decision if you look at extramural funding and the quality of the affiliated medical center Iowa is far superior. I don't want to put Creighton down but being a private school in a city with a public medical school (and once again a lot of people in Omaha will say that UNMC has fast become the better of the two Omaha schools) it just doesn't have the resources that Iowa being the only allopathic school in the state recieves from both private and public sources. I think you should definitely still interview at Creighton and check it out as a point of comparison for yourself (and also go look at UNMC while you are there because seriously the Creighton students will admit they use their library most of the time). If you get a full ride scholarship I would say go with Creighton...if you are paying sticker don't even think twice and go to Iowa.
snobored18 said:No prob...when is your Creighton interview??? if you have time go check out the Old Market district of Omaha (literally a few blocks downtown from the Creighton campus)...that, the Henry Doorly Zoo and the Qwest center are Omaha's only redeeming qualities (hint hint I'm not a fan of Omaha...its kind of a dump...but Warren Buffet and Strategic Air Command are both located there).
Scarlett27 said:Thanks so much gdbaby. I loved Iowa. I really liked the whole CELLS program and the facilities were incredible. The only aspect of Iowa that seems to be weighing on my mind is the actual experience I will gain during clinicals. I don't plan on working in a rural area after I graduate, so I'm a bit worried that I won't get the variety of exposure as I would in a larger city. I know that Iowa's reputation is much better than Creighton's, but I think I'm just trying to keep my options open. Although, I do believe that Iowa is where I'll find myself come August.
Scarlett27 said:Thanks so much gdbaby. I loved Iowa. I really liked the whole CELLS program and the facilities were incredible. The only aspect of Iowa that seems to be weighing on my mind is the actual experience I will gain during clinicals. I don't plan on working in a rural area after I graduate, so I'm a bit worried that I won't get the variety of exposure as I would in a larger city. I know that Iowa's reputation is much better than Creighton's, but I think I'm just trying to keep my options open. Although, I do believe that Iowa is where I'll find myself come August.
91Bravo said:The clinical rotations at the University of Iowa are great. As a tertiary care center I am confident you'll see quite a bit more at Iowa than you might at Creighton. Creighton's hospital isn't anywhere near as high-speed as UIHC. Research opportunities are plentiful and the clinical rotations are top-notch. Don't rely on assumptions. Take some time online to research Creighton University Meidcal Center and the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics.
Scarlett27 said:What do you guys think? I need your opinions...
gdbaby said:Iowa's even makes it cheaper for me to go there than my state school (Colorado) so I will have a really tough, albeit incredibly thankful, decision to make if it comes down to that.
They showered me with scholarships. Over 1/2 off OOS tuition. Don't know about the rocking part as you can see from my profile, but ability to perform sexual favors is highly regarded.Messerschmitts said:How is that possible, gdbaby? When I intervied at Iowa, they told me we OOSers have to pay 4 years of atrocious OOS tuition! You got Iowa ties for residency purposes, or do you just rock so much that they showered you with scholarships? 😛
Hi, just thought I'd bump this thread as I'm currently trying to decide between Creighton and Iowa.
I'm IS and a current student at Iowa, so it would be a lot cheaper and I have plenty of friends here. On the other hand, I'm really dissatisfied with my master's degree program at Iowa (namely a lack of advising, mediocre classes, and feeling like I'm just a number at this school). I know the carver college of medicine will be an entirely different learning environment, but I'm getting tired of this place and not sure if I want to stick around for another four years. I really enjoyed my visit to Creighton and I was impressed with the laid back and welcoming attitude of both the students and faculty...however, the price is fairly steep.
So, I'm just wondering if anyone has any more up to date arguments in favor of either school? Thanks!
What masters program are you doing?Hi, just thought I'd bump this thread as I'm currently trying to decide between Creighton and Iowa.
I'm IS and a current student at Iowa, so it would be a lot cheaper and I have plenty of friends here. On the other hand, I'm really dissatisfied with my master's degree program at Iowa (namely a lack of advising, mediocre classes, and feeling like I'm just a number at this school). I know the carver college of medicine will be an entirely different learning environment, but I'm getting tired of this place and not sure if I want to stick around for another four years. I really enjoyed my visit to Creighton and I was impressed with the laid back and welcoming attitude of both the students and faculty...however, the price is fairly steep.
So, I'm just wondering if anyone has any more up to date arguments in favor of either school? Thanks!
maybe i am being naive, but I feel that choosing a program based on how complicated of cases are sent to their hospitals or how well ranked their departments are isnt the best approach. My reasoning is that in medical school you are still largely concerned with the "basics" of each rotation. Residency seems to be the spot where you want to worry more about exposure to the high-profile type cases to get some real experience. But in medical school, you arent gonna be involved in the slightest with those cases anyway, so what's the big deal?? Again, I may be off, but that's just something to think about.
Personally, Creighton is an awesome school, has an amazing atmosphere, and a pretty good rep. (you arent gonna have any trouble getting the residency you want going to Creighton over Iowa). However, Creighton is wicked pricy, so if you are instate at Iowa, go there.
This is debatable, and varies between schools. I recall someone saying the cases at Iowa would be less complicated, etc. than at Creighton because Iowa City is smaller than Omaha and this simply is not true. That's why I brought up reputation of Iowa's hospital.
Creighton is a fine school, but I firmly think Iowa is better due to reputation, facilities, cost (if in-state), research opportunities, size + reputation of hospital, etc.
Still, go to the Creighton interview. You've got nothing to loose and may end up being "wowed" by the school.
Agreed, and I'd like to hope the "better" schools (research/reputation/etc) have a "better" learning environment, which may not always be the case.I think jimmy812 went to the Creighton interview already and liked it. From my perspective, the quality of teaching and the environment are more important than reputation/facilities/cases. I'd rather go somewhere where I feel like I'm learning and happy versus wandering around a reputable hospital not knowing what's going on and being scolded by residents/attendings for not knowing anything.
I think the two most important things to consider are cost and learning environment. Of course, Iowa would have the lower cost since you're in-state... and if you feel that Iowa has a better learning environment then of course go there.
Thank you all for your input! I suppose I'll wait for the financial aid offers before I sit down and make a decision...