- Joined
- Jun 12, 2003
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 2
Is anyone else tired of this topic??
Originally posted by doc_strange2001
Is anyone else tired of this topic??
Originally posted by KMcHugh
MDA's supervised the rooms, and were present for induction. After the patient was induced, the MDA left the room, but was available to be called back if we ran into a problem. They did not return for emergence.
Originally posted by ravanbj
I don't mind using them as little worker ants to do all the boring stuff like charting, appy cases, setting up the room, etc.. Whatever makes my life easier.
Originally posted by gaseous
***One note - They all seemed worried that CRNA's salaries keep increasing while MDAs were not which might kill their jobs. They were worried that there would be no incentive to use them instead of MDAs. But in the end, I think a supply and demand issue remains.
Originally posted by Adcadet
thanks Kevin. Any MDA's or MDA's in training want to comment on their typical experience?
Originally posted by Werry
For the person who posted the CRNA course list:
I don't see any Pathology or Pathophysiology in there...the basis for practicing medicine. All I see is a watered down anatomy course, physio, pharm, some BS touchy-feely courses, and Chem and Physics stuffed into one class...two subjects which physicians spend a year EACH on...in undergrad!
Originally posted by CougRN
Patho we take as undergrads ourselves, plus chemistry and physics.
Originally posted by Teufelhunden
I have no stake in this debate whatsoever, but I was shocked to learn that nurses take pathology in their undergrad (?)
I talked to a few BSNs about this, and none of them even knew what Robbins was!? I know that nursing programs usually have a course entitled "Pathophysiology," but I asure you, it is nothing like medical school pathology.
In fact, my undergrad physiology teacher also taught the nursing "Pathophysiology" course, and he said it was easier than the Bio major's physio course.
Again, nothing against nurses, CRNAs, etc...but lets be accurate when we compare our educations.
Originally posted by Tenesma
yawn... can somebody kill this thread please
Originally posted by Linear
If there is anything that needs to be fought it's the fact that all professions are in jeopardy. Engineers are facing it, and we as health professionals will face it eventually. The USA is seeing a huge amt of professional work being done in foreign countries. Engineers are a glut in the USA because many companies are hiring engineers in countries such as India and China. Why pay a USA engineer 90k when you can pay a foreign engineer 20k who can provide the same quality of work? You think healthcare is immune? Like the rest of your life, you're wrong. With the new digital era, digitalized radiographs can be sent to doctors in foreign countries, read, and then interpretations sent via e-mail back to the hospital in whichever country. All within a rapid turnover and cheaper costs, and most likely the Chinese counterpart will work much harder than the "fat, lazy American." No patient contact is not such a good thing now, is it? Those doctors that have actual hands-on with patients are somewhat immune, but are still vulnerable. Insurance, hospitals, legislatures, and various ancillary companies are now making plans to fly in doctors, including surgeons, from other countries to the USA. Other alternatives including flying pts who are seeking elective surgery to foreign countries. Why pay an American doctor several thousand when you can pay a foreign doctor several hundred? You get the idea? Doctors aren't in trouble. We all are, and if we don't start lobbying and working together to prove to big government that we can deliver the best healthcare at an affordable price, we'll all see our jobs going overseas or across the border. It's already happening with engineers and pharmaceuticals. Do you think we're immune? What do you really think these multiple twin separations that's happening in various countries around the globe is really about? Let me give you a hint: It's not about being captain of the team because, trust me, you aren't captain. You're a pawn just like the rest of us.
Tenesma said:it is interesting how this question comes up on a regular basis, either because of 1) applicants who have heard a lot of discussion regarding CRNA vs MD 2) non-anesthesia people stirring up the pot....
2 big points:
1) skill sets: while you can train any monkey to do a procedure - there is a HUGE difference in skills between graduating CRNAs and MDs..... the required CVP lines are 5 for CRNA graduation (go to AANA.com and look up certification guidelines) - and if they are performed on manequins that counts too.... your average anesthesia MD at end of residency (and this number DOESN'T include the lines placed during a medical or surgical internship) has placed 200-300 central lines.... CRNAs have to have placed 25 a-lines, anesthesia resident has placed 400-500.... the list goes on....
2) clinical exposure: the required clinical hours for CRNA graduation is on average 1600 hours.... Clinical hours for your average MD at end of residency is between 9,500 and 11,000 hours.... and that DOESN'T include the 4000 hours of patient management from internship....
and relying on a surgeon's opinion on what makes good anesthesia is a waste of time, as their's is entirely bogus and biased.... their criteria for judgement are based on their exposure.... just as anesthesiologists we prefer surgeons who are fast and don't lose any blood, but I know for sure that surgeons would argue that there is a lot more to being a competent surgeon than that
so for those who are worried about CRNAs... don't be... they have their role, MDs have theirs.... and for future anesthesia residents: it is a great field (one that i enjoy every day)
UTSouthwestern said:If you want to ask a question, you should just ask it on a new thread instead of digging up one that is best kept buried. You say you don't intend to start a flame war between MD's and CRNA's, yet you pick a thread with the title "MD vs. CRNA". Wonderful choice Peachy, just pure genius.
I'd ask the mods to lock this thread or separate your post to a new thread.
note: I know that I won't know what you guys go through until I walk in your shoes, but I don't understand how some of you can act so superior and as if your feces does not stink. scary stuff.
UTSouthwestern said:Understand that I admire your efforts to inquire about the profession you are about to join, but you seem to already have some preconceptions about what the medical field entails with regards to interdisciplinary attitudes. The "monkey" comments refer to manual dexterity and skill through repetition, NOT evolutionary stage, position in food chain, or bias.
In any event, there are many people who I would describe as "territorial" to put it mildly, but there are at least an equal amount of people in the medical profession who go beyond all necessity to ensure that their colleagues (ALL of them, be it MD, DO, RN, CRNA, OD, DDS, etc.) are treated equally. I walk around Southwestern and make sure that I do everything I can to make it the best environment for myself and my colleagues to work in, whether it is something as simple as saying hello or thank you to covering overnight calls for fellow residents who have an emergency.
It is something that I have a passion for because I came to anesthesiology from a program that did not provide that environment and left me determined to ensure that I gave the most positive influence on my new surroundings and new friends.
Will there always be conflicts among the many practitioners of medicine? Unfortunately, it is probable more than just possible so if you feel that the perception of one discipline of the medical spectrum (physicians) is contributing to that problem, just enter the field with the daily goal to facilitate the best relationship that can be had between yourself and your colleagues as well as between your colleagues themselves. DON'T judge them even though you may have an uncontrollable urge to, and if you do, don't show it and treat someone based on your personal opinion. Everyone is a member of the hospital team and cutting an arm or leg off doesn't help you and especially the patient.