Cube counting technique

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

michelleyx143

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
For this section I understand making a chart and tallying all the sides painted, however I'm having trouble seeing the "invisible" cubes. Are there any techniques to visualize them or is it something I'll get the hang of after more practice?

Members don't see this ad.
 
I always like to have 2 techniques and test them against each other.

When I "prepped" for PAT, I put my tic-tac-toe grids on the top half of my paper. On the bottom half, I divided it into 6 even boxes. In each of those boxes, I would put a small square in the top-left corner. In that small box, I would first count how many cubes there were in the ENTIRE structure, and write it down. when I finished counting my cubes' faces, I made sure the numbers matched up.

When you're looking for "hidden" cubes, remember this (because I had a lot of grief with these with CDP) you can only have a "hidden" cube if you can clearly see that there is another cube sitting on top of it. I did, in fact, have a hidden cube thrown at me on DAT (but it was pretty clear, though I think it could have thrown me off if I hadn't seen it in practice). When looking at the hidden cube, count them with the x,y,z axis. When all the cubes are the same size/color, they can make your eyes cross. When that happened to me, I would just count the bottom "layer" first and try to "block it out" (what I mean by block it out: sometimes you can quickly count cubes by seeing them as groups--for me, I would frequently get 8-block, 6-block, and 4-block combos). If you can get used to quickly visualizing this, you're half way there.

When you block out your cubes, you can much more easily keep track of your hidden cube.

Potential pitfalls from here:
1.) Always look for what's behind your hidden block. Are there more blocks behind the layer you're looking in? A really common trick I noticed was to put blocks not DIRECTLY behind your hidden cube, but maybe 1 space behind. This will expose the hidden cube's backside.
2.) Again, ONLY count a hidden cube if there's one sitting right on top of him. If you don't see a "floating" cube, never assume one is there.

If this is confusing, let me know. We can do a screenshare or skype or something and I can help you out more!
Also, as I was writing this, I saw your reply to my breakdown. Thank you so much!!! You've got this!
 
I always like to have 2 techniques and test them against each other.

When I "prepped" for PAT, I put my tic-tac-toe grids on the top half of my paper. On the bottom half, I divided it into 6 even boxes. In each of those boxes, I would put a small square in the top-left corner. In that small box, I would first count how many cubes there were in the ENTIRE structure, and write it down. when I finished counting my cubes' faces, I made sure the numbers matched up.

When you're looking for "hidden" cubes, remember this (because I had a lot of grief with these with CDP) you can only have a "hidden" cube if you can clearly see that there is another cube sitting on top of it. I did, in fact, have a hidden cube thrown at me on DAT (but it was pretty clear, though I think it could have thrown me off if I hadn't seen it in practice). When looking at the hidden cube, count them with the x,y,z axis. When all the cubes are the same size/color, they can make your eyes cross. When that happened to me, I would just count the bottom "layer" first and try to "block it out" (what I mean by block it out: sometimes you can quickly count cubes by seeing them as groups--for me, I would frequently get 8-block, 6-block, and 4-block combos). If you can get used to quickly visualizing this, you're half way there.

When you block out your cubes, you can much more easily keep track of your hidden cube.

Potential pitfalls from here:
1.) Always look for what's behind your hidden block. Are there more blocks behind the layer you're looking in? A really common trick I noticed was to put blocks not DIRECTLY behind your hidden cube, but maybe 1 space behind. This will expose the hidden cube's backside.
2.) Again, ONLY count a hidden cube if there's one sitting right on top of him. If you don't see a "floating" cube, never assume one is there.

If this is confusing, let me know. We can do a screenshare or skype or something and I can help you out more!
Also, as I was writing this, I saw your reply to my breakdown. Thank you so much!!! You've got this!

Thank you for the advice! It's a little confusing but I would definitely like to skype or something to get down the technique! What's the best way to contact you? And you're welcome for the reply 🙂
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Thank you for the advice! It's a little confusing but I would definitely like to skype or something to get down the technique! What's the best way to contact you? And you're welcome for the reply 🙂

My skype name is also SenoritaKorea! Haha and I'm online more or less every night. Let me know what day works best for you, and we'll set a date!
 
I count them then and answer, but when I reach the last question I count all the cubes to see if it matches my tallies. If not I redo it real fast. And I do what byu does with the one by one row by row in the same direction strat
 
I always like to have 2 techniques and test them against each other.

When I "prepped" for PAT, I put my tic-tac-toe grids on the top half of my paper. On the bottom half, I divided it into 6 even boxes. In each of those boxes, I would put a small square in the top-left corner. In that small box, I would first count how many cubes there were in the ENTIRE structure, and write it down. when I finished counting my cubes' faces, I made sure the numbers matched up.

When you're looking for "hidden" cubes, remember this (because I had a lot of grief with these with CDP) you can only have a "hidden" cube if you can clearly see that there is another cube sitting on top of it. I did, in fact, have a hidden cube thrown at me on DAT (but it was pretty clear, though I think it could have thrown me off if I hadn't seen it in practice). When looking at the hidden cube, count them with the x,y,z axis. When all the cubes are the same size/color, they can make your eyes cross. When that happened to me, I would just count the bottom "layer" first and try to "block it out" (what I mean by block it out: sometimes you can quickly count cubes by seeing them as groups--for me, I would frequently get 8-block, 6-block, and 4-block combos). If you can get used to quickly visualizing this, you're half way there.

When you block out your cubes, you can much more easily keep track of your hidden cube.

Potential pitfalls from here:
1.) Always look for what's behind your hidden block. Are there more blocks behind the layer you're looking in? A really common trick I noticed was to put blocks not DIRECTLY behind your hidden cube, but maybe 1 space behind. This will expose the hidden cube's backside.
2.) Again, ONLY count a hidden cube if there's one sitting right on top of him. If you don't see a "floating" cube, never assume one is there.

If this is confusing, let me know. We can do a screenshare or skype or something and I can help you out more!
Also, as I was writing this, I saw your reply to my breakdown. Thank you so much!!! You've got this!
Thanks for the explanation, it helps greatly. 🙂
 
For this section I understand making a chart and tallying all the sides painted, however I'm having trouble seeing the "invisible" cubes. Are there any techniques to visualize them or is it something I'll get the hang of after more practice?
I always like to have 2 techniques and test them against each other.

When I "prepped" for PAT, I put my tic-tac-toe grids on the top half of my paper. On the bottom half, I divided it into 6 even boxes. In each of those boxes, I would put a small square in the top-left corner. In that small box, I would first count how many cubes there were in the ENTIRE structure, and write it down. when I finished counting my cubes' faces, I made sure the numbers matched up.

When you're looking for "hidden" cubes, remember this (because I had a lot of grief with these with CDP) you can only have a "hidden" cube if you can clearly see that there is another cube sitting on top of it. I did, in fact, have a hidden cube thrown at me on DAT (but it was pretty clear, though I think it could have thrown me off if I hadn't seen it in practice). When looking at the hidden cube, count them with the x,y,z axis. When all the cubes are the same size/color, they can make your eyes cross. When that happened to me, I would just count the bottom "layer" first and try to "block it out" (what I mean by block it out: sometimes you can quickly count cubes by seeing them as groups--for me, I would frequently get 8-block, 6-block, and 4-block combos). If you can get used to quickly visualizing this, you're half way there.

When you block out your cubes, you can much more easily keep track of your hidden cube.

Potential pitfalls from here:
1.) Always look for what's behind your hidden block. Are there more blocks behind the layer you're looking in? A really common trick I noticed was to put blocks not DIRECTLY behind your hidden cube, but maybe 1 space behind. This will expose the hidden cube's backside.
2.) Again, ONLY count a hidden cube if there's one sitting right on top of him. If you don't see a "floating" cube, never assume one is there.

If this is confusing, let me know. We can do a screenshare or skype or something and I can help you out more!
Also, as I was writing this, I saw your reply to my breakdown. Thank you so much!!! You've got this!

I'm also having trouble visualizing the "invisible cubes." I'm working on DAT Genius practice problems and sometimes they will intentionally hide cubes. I'm not talking about supporting cubes here but completely hidden cubes. I can not just assume that they are there can I? On the real DAT are there completely hidden (non-supporting) cubes?
 
I'm also having trouble visualizing the "invisible cubes." I'm working on DAT Genius practice problems and sometimes they will intentionally hide cubes. I'm not talking about supporting cubes here but completely hidden cubes. I can not just assume that they are there can I? On the real DAT are there completely hidden (non-supporting) cubes?
Im pretty sure the only time there are hidden cubes is if they are supporting something on top. If there is nothing above a potential invisible cube then there isn't a hidden cube at all.
 
I'm also having trouble visualizing the "invisible cubes." I'm working on DAT Genius practice problems and sometimes they will intentionally hide cubes. I'm not talking about supporting cubes here but completely hidden cubes. I can not just assume that they are there can I? On the real DAT are there completely hidden (non-supporting) cubes?

are you using bootcamp? i recommend getting bootcamp because they just added cube counting tutorial videos which explain all the strategies and they have great practice problems.
 
Im pretty sure the only time there are hidden cubes is if they are supporting something on top. If there is nothing above a potential invisible cube then there isn't a hidden cube at all.
Okay, thanks so much. That's what I was thinking... they can't just randomly hide cubes and expect you to assume they are there. DAT Genius is kind of cheating...
 
Top