I've heard that Crack is the overall most realistic for the actual DAT...except for cube counting. So which would you guys say is more realistic as far as cube counting goes...Topscore...Acheiver...Kaplan...etc?
Cube Counting - which practice is most realistic to DAT?
- Thread starter STACM
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,714
- Reaction score
- 4
well I didn't pay that much attention while taking the test about what it was comparable to. But if you can do crack pat cube counting, then you are good to go.
- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 746
- Reaction score
- 1
Need help with some difficult cube counting. Check this thread. http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=532310
Feel free to PM me with any questions once you've read that thread.
Feel free to PM me with any questions once you've read that thread.
I wasnt really refering to Crack's "optical illusion" like cube pictures...I just mean its harder because there are lots more cubes and different angles in Crack, which makes it harder for me to keep track of where I am and which blocks I've counted...leading to mistakes
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2008
- Messages
- 2,134
- Reaction score
- 3
As far as i know there arent any of those rediculous "illusion" questions like they have in crack. Achiever and topscores cubes seem much more on target.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,714
- Reaction score
- 4
True. There aren't going to be crazy illusion cubes, that doesn't mean you shouldn't prepare yourself for it. They could throw in a tricky one in there. My test didn't have crazy illusion, but they weren't as easy as kaplan blue book & topscore either. Some of them did make you think a little. I think that section falls between crack pat & topscore. I always think its better to be over prepared than the other way around. No one can guarantee you with anything. So the best thing to do is practice as much as you can. GL
