coastal said:
This comment is based on what? It's easy to find excuses.
True. but that was his comment and he wasn't too interested in Queen's to begin with. and with his scores, he didn't need excuses.
I have never applied there for any dep/fac so I don't know. However, I know a few students who have applied and to those who got an interview in their respective departments, they were asked if they were children of alumni. Unless you're going to use this to someone's advantage or disadvantage, I don't know why they would ask a whole lot of people in a whole lot of departments that very question. It just seems strange. I can see later on, the head of department you've gotten to know through classes and stuff.... or s/he remembers your parent/s from his/her uni days
This is similiar to the fact that every student who goes to McGill knows that it has a rather lax cheating policy, to say the very least. I, thankfully, only took one class there (did undergrad elsewhere - and i'm by no streth of the imagination implying it was a better school) but had quite a few friends who went there and they were frankly horrified that it was just so easy to cheat. You didn't even have to plan or go out of your way to do so.
Granted, these people weren't in med or law. however, med and law at McGill are programs with longstanding "great" reputations. If there was such cheating going on, would it be in the best interest of the school to erradicate it at the expense of the school's reputation, or just let it slide like it does in all its other departments? I'm not saying that cheating is going on in the med school like it's going on where i've seen it because these students do have to pass the MCCQE 1 and 2 and that has to be done on your own (i'm assuming).
All to say that the school prospectus doesn't tell all. You have to ask students what the hell is really going on.
-S