CVS changes name, stops tobacco sales early

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

maria1oh

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
619
Reaction score
159
As CVS sharpens its focus on customer health, the nation's second-largest drugstore chain will tweak its corporate name and stop the sale of tobacco nearly a month sooner than planned.

CVS Caremark said it will now be known as CVS Health, effective immediately. The signs on its roughly 7,700 drugstores won't change, so the tweak may not register with shoppers.

However, those customers will see a big change when they check out. The cigars and cigarettes that used to fill the shelves behind store cash registers have been replaced with nicotine gum and signs urging visitors to kick the tobacco habit.

A store in downtown Indianapolis also stocked free tobacco quit packs where cigarettes used to sit. The red-and-white boxes, nearly the size of a cigarette pack, contain coupons, a card showing how much a smoker can save by quitting and a booklet with Sudoku and other games to distract someone fighting the urge to smoke.

CVS and other drugstores have delved deeper into customer health in recent years, in part to serve the aging baby boom generation and the millions of uninsured people who are expected to gain coverage under the federal health care overhaul. While competitors Walgreen Co. and Rite Aid Corp. still sell tobacco, they've all started offering more health care products and added walk-in clinics to their stores while expanding the care they provide.

Drugstores now offer an array of vaccinations and flu shots, and many of their clinics can help monitor chronic illnesses like diabetes or high blood pressure.

"We're doing more and more to extend the front lines of health care," CVS CEO Larry Merlo said.

The corporate name change reflects this push while removing a reference to the company's biggest revenue producer, its Caremark pharmacy benefits management side.

That's good because the average person didn't understand the word Caremark, according to Laura Ries, president of the brand consulting firm Ries & Ries.

While the new name won't appear on store signs, it may provide a better sense of what CVS does to the few investors or people on Wall Street who don't know about the company, which is ranked 12th in the 2014 Fortune 500.

Even so, Ries said the name's power is limited because health is a generic word that is common in many company names.

"It's an improvement off of Caremark, but it's not some amazing wonderful thing that will change the world," she said.

CVS announced earlier in February that it would phase out tobacco sales by Oct. 1 because it could no longer sell smokes in a setting where health care is delivered. Merlo said the company moved up its quit date nearly a month because they got ready for the move sooner than they anticipated, not because its distribution centers had already run out of tobacco.

The CEO has said CVS will lose about $2 billion in annual revenue by phasing out tobacco. The company still expects that, but its executives also believe they can counter that loss at least in part through growth the company may get from health care. Merlo declined estimate how much of a benefit CVS expects.

The potential revenue loss hasn't spooked investors so far. CVS shares closed at $79.73 on Tuesday and have climbed about 21 percent since the tobacco announcement. That outpaces the 14 percent gain notched by the Standard & Poor's 500 index over the same span.

http://news.yahoo.com/cvs-changes-name-stops-tobacco-040242354.html

Members don't see this ad.
 
Stupid financial decision driven by ideology and not profit margins. Reminds me of the US Government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
$2 billion loss from revenue of $126 billion? the loss is insignificant, while they get all the media attention and so called business leader. i hope with all the media attention, the media will film the long lines at the pharmacy and customers yelling and cursing at the pharmacists. i dropped off my script in the morning, or yesterday, why is it not ready??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
$2 billion loss from revenue of $126 billion? the loss is insignificant, while they get all the media attention and so called business leader. i hope with all the media attention, the media will film the long lines at the pharmacy and customers yelling and cursing at the pharmacists. i dropped off my script in the morning, or yesterday, why is it not ready??

I have to admit I lolled at the mental image of your customers going ape.

The loss of 2 billion in associated sales is an estimate, not yet a reality. It's not just the tobacco they're losing out on.

I know if I were a smoker, as many members of the huddled masses are, I would switch to Walmart immediately in order to only make one trip to pick up my pills and smokes. Long term effects of the decision are a mystery until they actually hit.
 
So far wallstreet disagrees.

Time will tell whether or not it has a significant impact on sales. Projections do not have absolute clarity, hindsight does.

You can say you want your customers to be healthy until you're blue in the face, that doesn't change the fact that chronic illness drives profit margin for a pharmacy.

It's AWFUL to say, but chronic illness is good for business.
 
Time will tell whether or not it has a significant impact on sales. Projections do not have absolute clarity, hindsight does.

You can say you want your customers to be healthy until you're blue in the face, that doesn't change the fact that chronic illness drives profit margin for a pharmacy.

It's AWFUL to say, but chronic illness is good for business.

Correction people that manage their chronic illness is good for the pharmacy business. A chronically ill patient that doesn't care or doesn't want to do anything for their condition (like be adherent and fill their prescriptions many times a year, or even worse fill at all) isn't as good as a chronically ill patient that will take their medications religiously because they want to be healthy. In turn we as health care professionals, and pharmacists, believe that doing this is associated with positive health outcomes including mortality. So if they live longer, I think that's even more months the chronically ill patient that is choosing to make healthy choices is filling at the pharmacy. If we factor in the managed care angle you'll probably see greater leverage for preferred contracting and they will probably set themselves up nicely for any quality incentives (if they ever happen).
 
Stupid financial decision driven by ideology and not profit margins. Reminds me of the US Government.

Are you sure this isn't a smart move that is driven by ideology AND profit margins. If I was a health plan looking for a PBM do the actions of CVS/pharmacy trickle through to "CVS/caremark"? Maybe the opportunity cost of selling tobacco hit a tipping point and the profit margins associated in other lines of their business are greater than the profit margins related to the sale of tobacco. But time will tell.
 
Aren't there rumors of an inversion floating around? Stock is at a 52 week high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This rumor is new. Cvs stock has been in the high 70s for the last 6 months
 
Are you sure this isn't a smart move that is driven by ideology AND profit margins. If I was a health plan looking for a PBM do the actions of CVS/pharmacy trickle through to "CVS/caremark"? Maybe the opportunity cost of selling tobacco hit a tipping point and the profit margins associated in other lines of their business are greater than the profit margins related to the sale of tobacco. But time will tell.
Someone here is smart.
 
Top