According to dat reading, what does search and destroy means? Is it like that you find the answer based from the passage
For tone and inference questions you have to read slightly more of what?You read the question then search the passage for the answer. This is my method 90% of the time. For tone and inference, you have to read slightly more of it.
You have to read more of the passage than just finding the answer. Probably the paragraph that relates to the subject the question is asking.For tone and inference questions you have to read slightly more of what?
The real dat vs crack the dat reading which one is easier?For tone and inference questions you have to read slightly more of what?
I haven't taken the real thing, yet, and I'm not using crack the DAT.The real dat vs crack the dat reading which one is easier?
How is the real thing compared to CDR and other tests?I have no idea how everyone does well with S&D. I just read each passage, writing a few key words along the way with the paragraph number and scored a 24. Aren't you taking a huge risk by not reading the passage completely?
I don't think it's a risk. You have possible answer choices, so you have an idea of what to look for. You find the section that talks about the question, and you select the corresponding answer. This works for me, because I'm a slow reader. It makes my reading comprehension high, but I end up running out of time. But, as always ymmv.I have no idea how everyone does well with S&D. I just read each passage, writing a few key words along the way with the paragraph number and scored a 24. Aren't you taking a huge risk by not reading the passage completely?
How is the real thing compared to CDR and other tests?