- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 1
delere
Last edited:
If a disorder truly exists, tests must confirm its presence.
If a disorder truly exists, tests must confirm its presence.
I never thought about it much until my wife and I had our first kid.
After our baby was born, my wife told me her need for sleep is a lot less. She still laments poor sleep, being up all night with the baby etc, but she's operating on 3-4 hours of sleep, while I can't for days straight.
We've all read the data that bipolar disorder is often first seen post-partum, and that PP psychosis or depression is possibly a manifestation of bipolar disorder, and that birth can somehow contribute to this process, the but how it does it is still up in the air.
No, the wife is not manic, but I just found it real odd. She's able to operate on very poor sleep and she wasn't able to do it before. On top of that, there are advantages to mothers being up all the time to breastfeed, but from an evolutionary standpoint to also guard the baby.
There's data suggesting that circadian rhythms are tied in with bipolar disorder, and while a connection has been established, the actual mechanics have not.
This is leading me to suspect that something in the birth process is affecting the medial preoptic or suprechiasmatic area of the hypothalamus (the areas that are may be governing circadian rhythms), and that is also somehow related to bipolar disorder. Just a theory, but something I'd consider if I ever did research in the area.
Agree with you. My wife and I are new parents, and she is definitely working much harder at it than me because in order to breast feed the baby, she has to do it every 1-3 hours around the clock.
PP blues actually occurs in the majority. The lowest numbers in studies are 50%, the largest above 80%. The stress is enormous, as I'm sure all of you parents already know. In addition, it's my personal opinion that there's some type of circadian rhythm/hormonal physiological event that occurs in addition to all the stress. Just what it is hasn't exactly been narrowed down.
IMHO the data in this field is paltry, and it's not surprising given that we can't do invasive experiments on pregnant women and new mothers and given what little we know of mental illness in general.
I pretty much avoid Reglan. Aside from what you mentioned, it has plenty of psychiatric side effects. My reasoning is if I already got a psychiatric patient, why give them something that's just going to confuse the picture even more as to what's causing the problem? There's plenty of alteratives. I've never been in a situation where the alternatives were tried but didn't work. Perhaps then I would be okay with it.