nug

Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jun 17, 2002
121
0
Status (Visible)
Is there anything for dental anatomy like Netter's Atlas was for gross anatomy? I mean big colorful pictures of teeth with all the little cusps, ridges, surfaces etc.?
 

UBTom

Class '04 official geezer
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 24, 2002
1,459
4
Queens, NY
www.iloveny.com
Status (Visible)
Hi Nug,

Woefel's Dental Anatomy is pretty good... Most of the photos were black and white though, but with teeth it's usually good enough. :D

Both my sister's school (NYUCD) and mine (UB) use Woefel's.

Luck!
 

smilemaker

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 13, 2002
71
0
Status (Visible)
Hi,
I also wanted some help to learn dental anatomy ..But this book woefel'sdental anatomy is not found anywhere ..even if you put it at google or barnes and nobles ..
Can you post the correct name of the book ..so that it would be useful to us ?
Thanks
smilemaker:confused:
 
About the Ads

smilemaker

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 13, 2002
71
0
Status (Visible)
Thanks Tom ..for letting us know
This book really seems extensive !!
Smilemaker:p
"Knowledge is Power"
 

Kung Foo

Mad Scientist...
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 29, 2002
179
0
the edge of decay
Status (Visible)
  1. Post Doc
Glad to hear other schools use this book too! I'm @ ohio state , and Dr. Scheid teaches the D1 dental anatomy course - so of course we use the Woelfel/Scheid dental anatomy book too =) As a super bonus, it has pull out pages in the back which have diagrams for each tooth class, characteristics, and how to differentiate between class, arch and individual tooth - sort of the quick and dirty version of what you need to know - and a great help if you have to do tooth ID on extracted teeth =)
On a side note, Scheid is awesome in class - and he has a masters degree in education - so dentally and pedagogically the text hits the nail on the head. Oh, and it's softcover, so not outrageously expensive. Good luck!
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.