- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 6,874
- Reaction score
- 1,359
I'm the last person who would say you shouldn't go into medicine for the money, but you come off as a huge douchebag if your only reason for being against neuroscience is the $90k/year average salary.
I mean, I could understand someone not choosing a career line that doesn't make enough money to live off of (say, music or art or something). But looking down at $90k/year? Thats very 1% of you to say >.<
Well if there's an alternative career path that could be paying $200k/year, I don't think it's ludicrous to feel squeamish about going for less than half that. Money talks in society, and those with money get first choice on things like safe neighborhoods, quality of kids education, relaxing vacations, etc etc. Maybe in a world where someone making $200k+ would have so many advantages (that are passed on to their kids) compared to $90k/year I could see it being douchy to balk at $90k.
But that's not true, at least not in this country. That's a huge difference in salary. I think it's a shame, and I personally would not need a job to pay more than $90k for me to be happy, but I'm certainly not going to pretend that there's some kind of marginal difference between the salary of a specialist physician and a neuroscientist. Don't get mad at him, get mad at the system.