- Joined
- Apr 6, 2007
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 1,015
We present a case of presumed radiculomedullary artery injection, during an L1/2 TFESI, with temporary paraplegia caused by the anesthetic, but no apparent detrimental effect from the co-injected dexamethasone. The aberrant injection was determined to be in a radiculomedullary artery rather than subarachnoid based upon the epidural contrast flow pattern and the patient's ‘normal’ sensation with complete but temporary lower extremity paralysis.
I would certainly inject thatI'd inject that all day if there wasn't signal change. Big cephalad extension but only moderate stenosis centrally and foraminally. T12-L1 ILESI, flow up to herniation, down to adjacent segment stenosis.
Care to explain the mechanism of action of how local anesthetic injection into the rm artery can cause this?It was “optimistic” to think dexamethasone was going to fix that.
With the preserved sensation in the BLE + motor loss that isn’t an intrathecal injection. More consistent with infarction/local anesthetic injection into rm artery.
Certainly vasospasm. My thought was direct delivery of local anesthetic to nervous tissue fed by the artery causing a temporary anterior cord syndrome (in the same way a few cc’s of local causing seizures if injected into the vert).Care to explain the mechanism of action of how local anesthetic injection into the rm artery can cause this?
I’m thinking you’re thinking vasospasm? Is vasospasm unique to local anesthetic?
Which is the scary part in all this. Even if dexamethasone is used, given arteries can’t be visualized under fluoroscopy until contrast is given, (and even then, may not show up), if vasospasm occurs from direct needle contact or contrast administration, then I guess we can only do our best in trying to minimize these things happening with digital subtraction and choice of steroid.Lidocaine causing arterial vasospasm?? It’s a vasodilator! If spasm is suspected it could be from direct needle contact, steroid, or contrast.
I agree with a previous poster that the likelihood of these things happening is relatively low, but it is a scary thought because one of these types of events is too many given the potential severity of outcomes.
This article always stumped me. So "ESI" is equally effective if I use steroids or not, as long as I use local. Other studies show that the ESI is equally effective if I use local or not, as long as I use steroids. Studies show similar results between particulate and non-particulate steroids as well.Lack of Superiority of Epidural Injections with Lidocaine with Steroids Compared to Without Steroids in Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
Overall, the present meta-analysis shows moderate (Level II) evidence for epidural injections with lidocaine with or without steroids in managing spinal pain secondary to disc herniation, spinal stenosis, discogenic pain, and post-surgery syndrome based on relevant, high-quality RCTs. Results...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
So true potentially .This article always stumped me. So "ESI" is equally effective if I use steroids or not, as long as I use local. Other studies show that the ESI is equally effective if I use local or not, as long as I use steroids. Studies show similar results between particulate and non-particulate steroids as well.
I would like to see a study comparing the effect of an "ESI" just using saline. Maybe the whole point of these injections are just to wash away chemical irritants and put some fluid between an angry disc and a nerve.
I would like to see a study comparing the effect of an "ESI" just using saline. Maybe the whole point of these injections are just to wash away chemical irritants and put some fluid between an angry disc and a nerve.
"Rinsing it off" is part of why these work IMO. At least, that's what I tell myself.Maybe the whole point of these injections are just to wash away chemical irritants and put some fluid between an angry disc and a nerve.
The problem is the LCD calls for steroid technically."Rinsing it off" is part of why these work IMO. At least, that's what I tell myself.
Lidocaine causing arterial vasospasm?? It’s a vasodilator! If spasm is suspected it could be from direct needle contact, steroid, or contrast.
"The needle spasm thing...Probably isn't real."Spinal Wada test - PubMed
Various doses of pentobarbital (1.25-20 mg) and lidocaine (2.5-20 mg) were injected selectively into the artery of Adamkiewicz and anterior spinal artery of 11 monkeys. Pentobarbital produced an acute paraplegia; lidocaine caused a transient paraplegia followed by hyper-reflexia and muscular...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No, the needle causes vasospasm.
Lidocaine injected into arteries like rm or AoA will deliver lidocaine to the end organ (in this case anterior cord) and exert its effects, then be metabolized. Thus a transient paralysis.
"The needle spasm thing...Probably isn't real."
DJ Kennedy to me and 5 other fellows.
He went on to briefly discuss the fact CEA pts aren't dying regularly. I do recall our infusing thrombolytics during those surgeries.
Comparison of the efficacy of saline, local anesthetics, and steroids in epidural and facet joint injections for the management of spinal pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trialsLack of Superiority of Epidural Injections with Lidocaine with Steroids Compared to Without Steroids in Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
Overall, the present meta-analysis shows moderate (Level II) evidence for epidural injections with lidocaine with or without steroids in managing spinal pain secondary to disc herniation, spinal stenosis, discogenic pain, and post-surgery syndrome based on relevant, high-quality RCTs. Results...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Interesting. Not sure an ESI is helping that massive honker of extrusion above multilevel fusion.
Endoscopic or open surgery. Especially with cord edema.
Possibilities:
1. Injected rm artery and did not see it on DSA (I didn't on video)
2. Injected IT (never use lidocaine in ESI)
3. Injected into such severe stenosis with existing cord damage with transient increased pressure on cord (liquid- doubt it).
Glad it was temporary. Always DEX. No LIDO. Don't inject where it won't help. We don't save lives. We shouldn't risk catastrophic injury if chance of successful functional improvement outweighs risks.
I would not have offered a TFESI into that spine.
Dex only.What about L4-L5? Or lower? Still Dex only?