Diagnosing Cancer

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BlondeCookie

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is it true that the only definitive way to diagnose cancer is via a biopsy? I just wanted to know where the major diagnostic imaging techniques tells us in that regards. Main diagnostic imaging techniques being plain x-ray radiography, ultrasound, CT, MRI, PET, etc..
 
usually the diagnosis of carcinoma requires a pathologic diagnosis. so, yes, you may find a subclinical tumor on ct/mri/xray/pet/etc, but to determine which treatment (surg/chemo/rt) is best for the patient, you need pathology.

one use of imaging is to depict the extent of cancer (loco-regional vs metastatic) which helps us stage patients. based on their stage, we have optimal treatment regimens for pts. this may include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation (either solo or a combination).

in radiotherapy, we use imaging to help us design our treatment fields. for exampe, for lung cancer, some people advocate the fusion of pet and ct scans to help us better delineate tumor. for gbm's, we fuse mri and ct scans to better delineate the tumor, edema and its volumes.
 
tissue is the issue. you can't treat adequately without knowing what it is. to confirm mets sometimes other modalities are used but even then you have to be very careful before you assume mets as the paradigm changes.
 
Top Bottom