astronomicalasterisms
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2023
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 5
Hey guys, allow me to recount you my tale of woe for further context of how I ended up here to begin with-
I had applied to the UC Postbacc consortium, but was rejected because one of my letter of rec writers flaked on me. Eventually, he turned it in but the damage had already been done. Generously, CDU (Charles Drew University), being the nicest people alive actually deferred my acceptance into two separate programs: an SMP and an MPH. However, due to financial reasons and the fact that I had last-minute found out that my undergraduate credits bungled from Covid, I don't think I would have been able to attend those programs for this particular cycle.
I had my eye on a DIY Postbacc, of course, as a backup option, and so I ended up declining admissions to the programs to give myself grace to graduate, sort out my bachelors, and then hop back into the GPA repair. My gpa isn't *too* awful, it's sitting at a 3.4 from undergrad at UCLA with a sGPA around 3.3. I also came out of undergrad with around 500 clinical hours, and 50 research hours (no publications, though 🙁 ) which I acknowledge isn't much for a lot of you amazing smart folks here, but given the 'Rona situation and some personal situations, I think it sets me up for reasonable success to continue to build my resume.
So, as of now, I am currently halfway through my quarter at my DIY postbacc at the UCLA Extension school. I've set up some nice clinical opportunities for myself, and this is why I'm taking 2 classes as opposed to three, because I'd rather take two classes and excel than three and spread myself thin. However, it has come to my attenion that I "should" be taking 3 classes (I am taking 2, at the UCLA extension school so that caps out at around 8-10 units) and by default most are offered online. I hear that online postbaccs are no good, but I crossreferenced with the AAMC and the AAMC recognizes the UCLA extension school as a "real" and acceptable postbacc program.
So now I'm confused- some folks say 24 units is fine and taking 2 classes a quarter for three quarters is fine, and other folks are saying you have to be taking 12 units a quarter to make it worthwhile. I've seen some folks here on SDN who are anti-online postbaccs, but some folks self-report they did online postbaccs at AAMC recognized extensions schools and were otherwise quite fine.
Does anyone have any clarity here? I'm really stressed out- I'm not sure if I should continue down my UCLA extension path, or wait for the next application cycle for a formal, in person postbacc and spend this year working. I do see that UCLA Extension does offer certain postbacc classes in person, and so if I end up staying the course, I'll be making a point to try to enroll in as many of those as possible.
Irregardless, thanks you guys, sorry for all the anxiety, and I hope you guys have a good week!
I had applied to the UC Postbacc consortium, but was rejected because one of my letter of rec writers flaked on me. Eventually, he turned it in but the damage had already been done. Generously, CDU (Charles Drew University), being the nicest people alive actually deferred my acceptance into two separate programs: an SMP and an MPH. However, due to financial reasons and the fact that I had last-minute found out that my undergraduate credits bungled from Covid, I don't think I would have been able to attend those programs for this particular cycle.
I had my eye on a DIY Postbacc, of course, as a backup option, and so I ended up declining admissions to the programs to give myself grace to graduate, sort out my bachelors, and then hop back into the GPA repair. My gpa isn't *too* awful, it's sitting at a 3.4 from undergrad at UCLA with a sGPA around 3.3. I also came out of undergrad with around 500 clinical hours, and 50 research hours (no publications, though 🙁 ) which I acknowledge isn't much for a lot of you amazing smart folks here, but given the 'Rona situation and some personal situations, I think it sets me up for reasonable success to continue to build my resume.
So, as of now, I am currently halfway through my quarter at my DIY postbacc at the UCLA Extension school. I've set up some nice clinical opportunities for myself, and this is why I'm taking 2 classes as opposed to three, because I'd rather take two classes and excel than three and spread myself thin. However, it has come to my attenion that I "should" be taking 3 classes (I am taking 2, at the UCLA extension school so that caps out at around 8-10 units) and by default most are offered online. I hear that online postbaccs are no good, but I crossreferenced with the AAMC and the AAMC recognizes the UCLA extension school as a "real" and acceptable postbacc program.
So now I'm confused- some folks say 24 units is fine and taking 2 classes a quarter for three quarters is fine, and other folks are saying you have to be taking 12 units a quarter to make it worthwhile. I've seen some folks here on SDN who are anti-online postbaccs, but some folks self-report they did online postbaccs at AAMC recognized extensions schools and were otherwise quite fine.
Does anyone have any clarity here? I'm really stressed out- I'm not sure if I should continue down my UCLA extension path, or wait for the next application cycle for a formal, in person postbacc and spend this year working. I do see that UCLA Extension does offer certain postbacc classes in person, and so if I end up staying the course, I'll be making a point to try to enroll in as many of those as possible.
Irregardless, thanks you guys, sorry for all the anxiety, and I hope you guys have a good week!