I'm starting to pre-write some secondaries and I see a few schools ask in some capacity about a most meaningful non-academic achievement. If my real answer to this question centers on something I wrote about extensively in my PS and in a "most meaningful activity" for work/activities, would it be a bad idea to bring it up again as the answer to the secondary question? Although I would obviously not directly repeat myself and would do my best to cover new ground/refer to a new perspective, the fundamental core will be very similar. Is this a bad idea? This activity is something that had a huge impact on me and I feel is relatively distinguishing, but at the same time, I don't want to be repetitive to the point that my entire application seems boring and one-note. Thank you!