Distinction in Health Policy vs. Research

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

JABWS

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
290
Reaction score
6
I am currently an MS0 looking into various programs at the school I will be attending this Fall. I find myself very interested in public policy, and it just so happens that my school offers a distinction in public policy upon completion of 16 wks of pertinent activities, such as a congressional healthcare fellowship. This sounds incredibly enticing to me, not solely because of the distinction incentive, but because I am truly interested in the subject matter (I actually considered going to law school; I'm sure I'm not the first there). However, I know by taking this path, I will effectively forego many other opportunities to engage in clinical/basic research, which I also enjoy, but probably to a lesser extent. Any suggestions?

Other relevant information: I will be attending a great medical school (top 20), with exceptional resources and which has a reputation for being research oriented. Obtaining a solid residency is a high priority. I don't consider myself a gunner, but I do want to put myself in a good position if I decide to remain in academia or branch out and try to incorporate other areas of interest into my professional life. I guess that's where the dilemma sets in, because I don't want to compromise my chances of getting into a highly regarded residency program by choosing an area of concentration that is perceived as less valuable than clinical/basic science. And I don't know that that would be the case with regard to public policy, it's only a concern at this point due to my lack of knowledge.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Top