Do alkenes ever rearrange twice to get to the most stable carbocation?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

510586

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
290
Alkenes rearrange in SN1 reactions or when adding HBr if a more stable carbocation is possible. But is it possible for a carbocation to rearrange twice (1 degree to 2 degree to 3 degree) to get to the stablest carbocation? Or is that too many steps?

Members don't see this ad.
 
this is a pre dental aka admission/interview/acceptance and such sort.

almost nobody on here remember about the DAT and especially ochem carbocation stability during rearrangement or especially HBr addition.

you will be better at posting in DAT forum
 
this is a pre dental aka admission/interview/acceptance and such sort.

almost nobody on here remember about the DAT and especially ochem carbocation stability during rearrangement or especially HBr addition.

you will be better at posting in DAT forum
Oh shoot thought I was on the correct forum my bad!
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Alkenes rearrange in SN1 reactions or when adding HBr if a more stable carbocation is possible. But is it possible for a carbocation to rearrange twice (1 degree to 2 degree to 3 degree) to get to the stablest carbocation? Or is that too many steps?

This post reminded me of how glad I am to be done with the DAT... lol
 
Alkenes rearrange in SN1 reactions or when adding HBr if a more stable carbocation is possible. But is it possible for a carbocation to rearrange twice (1 degree to 2 degree to 3 degree) to get to the stablest carbocation? Or is that too many steps?


It's possible. Multiple hydride shifts can happen and the positive charge keeps "jumping" towards the most stable adjacent carbon (with most hydrocarbon groups attached). Of course, there might be multiple products, the most stable of which predominates.
 
It's possible. Multiple hydride shifts can happen and the positive charge keeps "jumping" towards the most stable adjacent carbon (with most hydrocarbon groups attached). Of course, there might be multiple products, the most stable of which predominates.
I have a dat destroyer question that only rearranges once. I remember a tutor said that it only rearranges once as well since 2 steps take longer or something but I might be wrong. I'll post an example to the thread on discussions or here if no one replies lol
 
It's possible. Multiple hydride shifts can happen and the positive charge keeps "jumping" towards the most stable adjacent carbon (with most hydrocarbon groups attached). Of course, there might be multiple products, the most stable of which predominates.

It's possible, but unlikely... normally if the shift is farther than one away, it won't happen. It would require too much energy. I doubt the DAT would test something like that. Although it's totally fair game to assume that if something is SN1, you know whether it's supposed to rearrange or not.
 
I have a dat destroyer question that only rearranges once. I remember a tutor said that it only rearranges once as well since 2 steps take longer or something but I might be wrong. I'll post an example to the thread on discussions or here if no one replies lol

What I said earlier was based on my orgo prof.."keep doin those hydride shifts." You might be right: 2 steps takes longer. But the product's more stable...meaning it should be energetically favorable (right?).
 
It's possible, but unlikely... normally if the shift is farther than one away, it won't happen. It would require too much energy. I doubt the DAT would test something like that. Although it's totally fair game to assume that if something is SN1, you know whether it's supposed to rearrange or not.
Oh yea I got that part I think. I hate the feeling where you kind of know the basics and it starts to be more about finding weird exceptions to stuff -__-
 
What I said earlier was based on my orgo prof.."keep doin those hydride shifts." You might be right: 2 steps takes longer. But the product's more stable...meaning it should be energetically favorable (right?).
Yea the reaction I have is like a naphthalene with a cyclohexene next to it. No idea if this is some strange exception but it can potentially place the Cl between the 2 rings. It would have a more stable carbocation but would be less stable by zaitsevs? augh
 
1300.gif


I got a 26 on the DAT ochem section last year and legitimately don't understand anything that is being talked about here. It didn't make sense when I took the DAT either but the power of memorization I guess..
 
Top