Do failed MILD, Vertiflex, and Minuteman count as FBSS in SCS Algorithm?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Do failed MIS procedures count as FBSS?

  • Yes, hell yeah.

    Votes: 7 38.9%
  • No, no way.

    Votes: 11 61.1%

  • Total voters
    18

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,566
Reaction score
6,963
What about failed Intracept and Intra-discal stem cells too? Do these count as "failures" worthy of proceeding with SCS especially if the patient is already on opioids?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Interesting thought. Microdiscectomy certainly counts, so does endoscopic? Percutaneous? Where is the line drawn?
 
  • Hmm
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
I gotta remember this thread for the next big Medicare fraud bust on stimulators
 
Do you think stim is over-utilized?
When I do it? No.

Is there a guy across the road who puts his stim in you on the first date? Yes. And then gets all creepy on you to get the permanent when the stim didn't help? Yes yes. I've gotten a couple of older patients who let their batteries die because "it never helped in the first place." It's not a stretch to imagine someone inappropriately calling interspinous spacer placement FBSS because it benefits their interests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
When I do it? No.

Is there a guy across the road who puts his stim in you on the first date? Yes. And then gets all creepy on you to get the permanent when the stim didn't help? Yes yes. I've gotten a couple of older patients who let their batteries die because "it never helped in the first place." It's not a stretch to imagine someone inappropriately calling interspinous spacer placement FBSS because it benefits their interests.

"Over-utilizer" = "Anyone who does more ________ than me?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Drusso, are you trying to play devils advocate here or are you asking for permission? If someone puts a spacer in a virgin spine and then tells them they failed surgery, that’s shady.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Drusso, are you trying to play devils advocate here or are you asking for permission? If someone puts a spacer in a virgin spine and then tells them they failed surgery, that’s shady.
Seen it. Several times. Usually combo of Vertiflex or some other variant, then SI fusions by pain dr. Failed? Fbss. Scs. Then come to me for 2nd opinion. Typically 50-70 with severe stenosis. Off to surgeon you go.
 
Drusso, are you trying to play devils advocate here or are you asking for permission? If someone puts a spacer in a virgin spine and then tells them they failed surgery, that’s shady.

I'm just trying to stoke some grown-up conversation around here...who decides who fails what? The patient, the treating doctor, or a second opinion?

Should the stim come first or second in "the algorithm?"

We can go back to talking about meth-head fish?


1625700604647.png
 
Last edited:
You cant do scs until youve done at least two 150k back fusions and the patient can’t walk.. everyone knows that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Vertiflex sucks just as much as X-stop. I’d call them “failed posterior element surgeries” or FPES Syndrome…. Somebody write it up for me.
 
It’s a great question as it’s more important than the answer.
 
We all know Lou is ready to put a Wavewriter Alpha in that Vflex patient, but looks like he did a very good job on the vflex. There are nice neuroforamenal openings at the treated levels and the levels above and below. I would expect
that patient to do very well. There is nothing to criticize there.
 
Approval guidelines usually require that there is no corrective surgery or that patient is not a good candidate for it, which is subjective.

Many older stenotic patients are not good candidates for lami/fusion so I think SCS after failure of mild or Vflex is appropriate in this population. There was a thread on here about this before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Can you elaborate what you mean?
the guiding principle of some of our thought leaders is that procedures that generate significant financial reward are the treatments we need to be advocating and performing.

I rarely see these leaderss advocating for treatments that, for example, your wife provides. maybe a passing "oh they get a referral for CBT in our office"...



there are at least 3 separate "pain" programs in this area that are run as block shops. id guestimate almost all of my private pay referrals are from patients who have gone to these other practices where the first and only time they see the pain doctor is in Pre An.

yes, these are the successful (financially) programs in town. 1 of the 3 is private.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
the guiding principle of some of our thought leaders is that procedures that generate significant financial reward are the treatments we need to be advocating and performing.

I rarely see these leaderss advocating for treatments that, for example, your wife provides. maybe a passing "oh they get a referral for CBT in our office"...



there are at least 3 separate "pain" programs in this area that are run as block shops. id guestimate almost all of my private pay referrals are from patients who have gone to these other practices where the first and only time they see the pain doctor is in Pre An.

yes, these are the successful (financially) programs in town. 1 of the 3 is private.

How does CBT fix stenosis?
 
We all know Lou is ready to put a Wavewriter Alpha in that Vflex patient, but looks like he did a very good job on the vflex. There are nice neuroforamenal openings at the treated levels and the levels above and below. I would expect
that patient to do very well. There is nothing to criticize there.
aside from the continuous lack of any collimation
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
I think in the future SCS will be more available to surgically naive patients, I’m sure Medtronic and others are working on the study.
 
DPN. Nevro. Excited to tear apart the study SIS.
I don’t think SCS should be used for every neuropathic pain condition like it’s a holy grail.

but if we put in stims for FBSS, who’s to say a lot of the chronic radic and back pain that is surgically naive wouldn’t benefit, just can’t predict who is going to have persistent pain after surgery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
yes the truth hurts sometimes.

or most of the time.



so lets just hide behind a veneer of big arse procedures or mind altering substances.

If there is one lesson physicians should have learned in the 20th century is that the misattribution of neurological symptoms to psychiatric disease is almost always wrong: See MS, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism, etc for examples.

Treat all pain and pain treatment failures as biological problems until proven otherwise.
 
If there is one lesson physicians should have learned in the 20th century is that the misattribution of neurological symptoms to psychiatric disease is almost always wrong: See MS, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism, etc for examples.

Treat all pain and pain treatment failures as biological problems until proven otherwise.
That’s a terrible idea. Pain is a symptom and not a disease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
If there is one lesson physicians should have learned in the 20th century is that the misattribution of neurological symptoms to psychiatric disease is almost always wrong: See MS, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism, etc for examples.

Treat all pain and pain treatment failures as biological problems until proven otherwise.
so every patient gets opioids, because from most patients standpoint that is the treatment for a biological problem.


can you rightly say that scrambling central nervous system pathways benefits any of those conditions? is frontal lobotomy the treatment of choice for MS, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

not sure how that makes your point that pain as a separate specific disease. essentially, this working group wants fibromyalgia and nonspecific low back pain to be classified as a separate disease called "chronic primary pain" and other pain syndromes that are associated with a disease to be called "chronic secondary pain", each with its own ICD. the purpose is to facilitate epidemiologic studies and change health policies and I'm not seeing anything about a true biological basis for making this classification.
 
What duct said. They aren’t arguing it is a disease. Just a title to draw attention and try and score research $$$$
 
I also agree, financials aside, that people should have the option of SCS without needing someone cutting their spine first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
@Ducttape and @lobelsteve ganging up on @drusso...there is a disturbance in The Force...
not ganging up.... but you are man enough to take it.
I also agree, financials aside, that people should have the option of SCS without needing someone cutting their spine first.
we already have enough inappropriate use of advanced procedures. if we were to give the option to do SCS without prior surgery, there need to be some appropriate indications that are fairly strict. otherwise the success rate will continue to plummet...

(some of the outstanding inappropriate uses I have personally seen in past - ITP for atypical facial pain; ITP for healed compression fx that failed tramadol; lumbar SCS for cervical postlaminectomy; SCS in nonsurgical normal spine and no neuropathy sx; cervical SCS for total body CRPS)
 
I’ve done plenty of successful stim in old folks that refuse surgery or are poor candidates for major interventions. It’s a good option for the over 80 year olds that I see
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
not ganging up.... but you are man enough to take it.

we already have enough inappropriate use of advanced procedures. if we were to give the option to do SCS without prior surgery, there need to be some appropriate indications that are fairly strict. otherwise the success rate will continue to plummet...

(some of the outstanding inappropriate uses I have personally seen in past - ITP for atypical facial pain; ITP for healed compression fx that failed tramadol; lumbar SCS for cervical postlaminectomy; SCS in nonsurgical normal spine and no neuropathy sx; cervical SCS for total body CRPS)
Just make the reimbursement $500, inappropriate use would stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top