How often does a bone histo look malignant, when in fact, it is not? For example, biopsies done of lesions that shouldn't have been biopsied (like desmoid that is mistaken for a ?paraosteal osteosarcoma). Not sure if I'm being clear.
How often does a bone histo look malignant, when in fact, it is not? For example, biopsies done of lesions that shouldn't have been biopsied (like desmoid that is mistaken for a ?paraosteal osteosarcoma). Not sure if I'm being clear.
How often does a bone histo look malignant, when in fact, it is not? For example, biopsies done of lesions that shouldn't have been biopsied (like desmoid that is mistaken for a ?paraosteal osteosarcoma). Not sure if I'm being clear.
I think it's often institution dependent. It's either IM or peds hematologist/oncologists or hematopathologists doing bone marrow biopsies. At my hospital I haven't seen pathologists do bone marrow biopsies. For FNAs it's either surgeons, radiologists (for stereotactic CT guided FNAs), or cytopathologists who do FNAs. But while I was on the interview trail at some institutions the cytopathologists don't do ANY FNAs because of billing purposes i.e. clinicians get billed more FNAs than a pathologist would.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.