It seems like they waitlist everyone. If thats the case getting in off waitlist doesnt seem that great of a possibility seeing as they only admit 300/700. Anyone know?
Originally posted by exmike
It seems like they waitlist everyone. If thats the case getting in off waitlist doesnt seem that great of a possibility seeing as they only admit 300/700. Anyone know?
Originally posted by Kashue
Yes, they do. One of the postdocs that I work with met with the Dean a few months ago and he said that you have to be a real jerk to get rejected. He said about 100 people are rejected out right and that Sinai's waitlist is about 300 people.
Originally posted by CalBeE
Knowing how many people they reject just kinda gave me the feeling that Mount Sinai doesn't choose who they interview carefully (place more emphasis on grades/MCAT?)
Originally posted by exmike
that means one out of four interviewees are jerks. wow.
Originally posted by SpiritiualDuck
what's the difference between 28 and 29?
Originally posted by Kashue
Yup. I mentioned this in another thread exmike started I think?
Sinai is definately numbers driven. They care about their US News Ranking. Two of my friends, both who got their PhDs from Sinai, got rejected to Sinai's Medical because of their low MCAT(27 and 28). And if you are thinking if it was for other things besides MCAT. Nope it wasn't. One of them was told face to face by the Dean that his MCAT was the reason and if he had 30 or even 29, "he would have gotten "noticed." So, he's studying for April MCAT and hopes to break or make 30.
Originally posted by facted
I don't know, but I wouldn't necessarily say this is the case. Perhaps they are MCAT # driven, but I don't think the same can be said for their GPA #'s. I was accepted and my GPA was nothing to write home about...
Originally posted by facted
Sure, of course that could be the caes, but it's unfair to qualify a school as being #'s driven because you know two people who weren't accepted because they had low MCAT scores...Just like my case is an individual basis, I would say their's are too. See what I'm saying?
I think that this whole process is very individualistic and people might not realize that. Sometimes there just is no rhyme or reason to any of it as there are so many different variables involved in not only your application but in what each school is looking for.
Originally posted by exmike
He's also URM. thats probably one of those "individual factors"
Originally posted by exmike
He's also URM. thats probably one of those "individual factors"
Originally posted by facted
Actually, be definition i'm not a URM according to the AMCAS website. I'm not mexican, puerto rican, etc... I'm from S. America. Anyway, regardless. Sure that might have something to do with my being accepted to the schools I was accepted to. So might have my MCAT score, the fact I went to an Ivy League school, the fact I might have interviewed well, research I did in school, my ec's, etc... My point was that #'s don't tell it all and I think it's unfair to categorize one school as "numbers driven" because people you know didn't get in with low #'s. There are plenty of people with high numbers who don't get in places as well...