- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 41
- Points
- 4,706

TCOM. My reason being that almost every applicant to the school is also an applicant to the other 7 MD schools in Texas. The school seems to realize that many students aren't too thrilled about OMM and they even cram OMM in the beginning of the year now so that we have the second semester with no OMM at all. The school also has rotation sites that are arguably better than some of the state MD schools. More than 80% match to ACGME programs.
Yeah but I think it might be too late? :/
@AlteredScale just a heads up. If you are accepted by OSUCOM, then you have to sign a contract stating you will practice in Ohio for at least five years after graduation.
I didn't submit a secondary here after finding that out.
@AlteredScale just a heads up. If you are accepted by OSUCOM, then you have to sign a contract stating you will practice in Ohio for at least five years after graduation.
I didn't submit a secondary here after finding that out.
PCOM seems overrated. While it is one of the better schools, I probably wouldn't put it in the same tier as the state schools.
haha no, I saw serenade had it and it sounded so cool that I had to have it too. I hope @serenade doesn't mind!
Just a heads up, that 'S' makes a difference.
@AlteredScale If you have really solid #s I wouldn't say it's too late. They interview into February and even March. You can find the secondary questions in the school thread.
Why would an Oklahoma school require someone to practice in Ohio? You thinking of the wrong school.
Eh not really. I agree with @pollos that it's CHM + OMM tacked on for a couple hours every week (plus we have nicer, more rounded students 😛).
Heck, we [in EL] share many of the same professors, labs, course packs, and facilities, actually...
Oh, don't get me wrong -- there's plenty of DO pride at MSUCOM!They seemed to make the case for it at the open houses this past week lol. One of the clinical faculty went off on DO pride.
Oh, don't get me wrong -- there's plenty of DO pride at MSUCOM!
However, in some places it's pretty obvious that we have overlap with CHM. .. like where our anatomy coursepack says "attacoment" instead of "attachment" because they did a "CHM" --> "COM" find-and-replace. 😛
Well, if I remember correctly, classes and block schedules used to be almost exactly the same between the MD and DO programs. However, COM has revised the curriculum substantially over the last few years, so I think there may be some divergence between material to incorporate longitudinal themes better. So ... haha not all of our coursepacks have such obvious mistakes, but I bet a good chunk of our material is shared.Hahaha no way! That's awesome. So they do that replacement with everything?
Title says it all![]()
there is something to be said, though, for schools that are connected to reputable universities. I am personally thankful for the few (MSU, OSU, etc) in the DO world that exist.I don't know about that. I'm really familiar with Rowan and PCOM, and I want to say although RowanSOM has a lot of potential, it's still trailing their neighbor osteopathic school across the Delaware.
All of them are, and none of them are, and I've been around at least six of them to get an idea of what they do.
This guy doesn't know what he's talking about brrrppp.Hmm I would say MSUCOM, Rowan, UNTHS/TCOM. All three seem to have really good research institutions backing them. I believe Rowan and UNT have affiliated university hospitals.
This guy doesn't know what he's talking about brrrppp.
Don't whoah bro me! Lol.Whoah whoah bro.
Title says it all![]()
it would be interesting to see a side-by-side review of an established DO school and a "lower tier" MD school. Say, PCOM vs Drexel.I disagree. Your title says nothing whatsoever. What do you mean by this? What criteria are you wanting us to compare? MD schools vary substantially in the same ways DO schools do, and there is significant overlap between MD/DO schools in terms of quality and characteristics.
And since you're giving us nothing to go on.. On the basis of:
a) Teaches classes
b) At the end you become a doctor
The answer is: ALL OF THEM
it would be interesting to see a side-by-side review of an established DO school and a "lower tier" MD school. Say, PCOM vs Drexel.
youre probably right, those two just came to mind. Perhaps another comparison could be CCOM vs RFU. But honestly, too many people get emotional and defensive at even the barest mention of MD vs DO topics.I think largely a more fair comparison would be PCOM to Commonwealth or a few UTs. Regardless of what the degree is Drexel is an enormous research institute with a top notch research academic setting hospital. PCOM is an establish community program more akin to Commonwealth College of Medicine.
When it comes down to it the issue is that most MD schools were devoured by larger schools in the 20th century. I mean Drexel's medical program for example was a separate one until Drexel decided to buy it out. DO schools didn't get that, and unfortunately aren't getting that for a lot of reasons.
youre probably right, those two just came to mind. Perhaps another comparison could be CCOM vs RFU. But honestly, too many people get emotional and defensive at even the barest mention of MD vs DO topics.
But that's not really the aim of these institutions, as I'm sure you know.I think we just need to be honest and admit that most DO schools aren't producing the cure for cancer anytime soon.
I think we just need to be honest and admit that most DO schools aren't producing the cure for cancer anytime soon.
But that's not really the aim of these institutions, as I'm sure you know.
Is it truly a medical school if it does not try to keep up with that?
Why should they be? What percent of physicians practice non-academic medicine? I suppose smaller colleges/ universities that focus more on education rather than research shouldn't be allowed to grant degrees either, eh? 🙄
Who is going to pay for this research? I believe a medical schools primary goal is to produce competent physicians who are up to date with the current literature, not produce it
from the ABIM's charter on physician responsibilities (that is endorsed by the AOA):Who is going to pay for this research? I believe a medical schools primary goal is to produce competent physicians who are up to date with the current literature, not produce it
Fixed that for ya.I think teaching and producing physicians is the point of medical school. However housing large academic endeavors in biomedical and clinical research I feel epitomizes what l̶a̶r̶g̶e̶ ̶m̶e̶d̶i̶c̶a̶l̶ ̶s̶c̶h̶o̶o̶l̶s̶ R1 research institutions are about in truth. They produce students within that context. [...]
I think medical schools have an obligation to help advance the profession by actively promoting scholarly activity, research, and innovation. I feel our schools fail the profession if not partaking in this. It doesn't have to be Harvard level, but I feel it is something that should be present and taken seriously.The questions is whether they should be or not. Truth is medicine has changed a lot, research is enormous integral to the very structure and foundation of how things are done. Is it truly a medical school if it does not try to keep up with that?
I think medical schools have an obligation to help advance the profession by actively promoting scholarly activity, research, and innovation. I feel our schools fail the profession if not partaking in this. It doesn't have to be Harvard level, but I feel it is something that should be present and taken seriously.
Hopefully, the numerous "chain restaurant" DO schools will follow suit as well.I think DO schools are slowly but surely expanding their research interests, though it's still a lot less activity than MD schools. State DO schools have research commitments close to that of state MD schools. Even private schools like PCOM have DO-PhD programs.
I'm yet to meet an NSU graduate who incorporated OMM into their practice.
I agree, but regardless, some institutions don't have a research focus, which was my point.The questions is whether they should be or not. Truth is medicine has changed a lot, research is enormous integral to the very structure and foundation of how things are done. Is it truly a medical school if it does not try to keep up with that?
I agree, but regardless, some institutions don't have a research focus, which was my point.
As a later poster points out, contribution to the body of knowledge is a responsibility of every physician, but do you think that the FP in nowhereville Washington is going to be producing original research? Probably not, however, I do think attendance of conferences and submission of case studies can be a good way for any doctor to make contributions to the body of knowledge.