- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 72,602
- Reaction score
- 115,611
Yup! That's why I use the Ignore function!I think you are fighting an uphill battle here. My generation has a lot of snowflakes that can't handle the heat..
Yup! That's why I use the Ignore function!I think you are fighting an uphill battle here. My generation has a lot of snowflakes that can't handle the heat..
I think you are fighting an uphill battle here. My generation has a lot of snowflakes that can't handle the heat..
In all fairness, the words "weak student" shouldn't apply to someone in med school because you have to be a strong student at the university level just to get into med school. Use the term weak students for people that can't make it out of HS or college. A lot of PhDs underestimate how challenging getting an MD is, hate to say this but a lot of the are PhDs because they couldn't get into med school, I guess they are weak students.
I think the best thing someone who is struggling can do is admit they might be a "weak student", and adjust accordingly. Accept themselves for who they are instead of pretending to be something they are not. Some people have to work harder than others to get the same results. Speaking from personal experience.
And some people get into med school despite actually being really, really weak students by every measure. My school goes out of its way to accept people with bad stats who will make good doctors if they can make it through (I am probably one of those people).
Pity we dont have an ignore button in the hospital to depress when physicians and admins merit it...Yup! That's why I use the Ignore function!
Yes please ignore me because I've been just so outrageous to suggest as an educator you not refer to your students pejoratively. How very snowflake-y of me.Yup! That's why I use the Ignore function!
Is it fair to compare sharing an answer on an exam with treating patients unethically? Surely you have more of the former than the latter.A lot of doctors do too.
They either get sued, fined, or go to prison.
Someone was allowed to repeat a year for academic dishonesty?
Context matters. There's cheating, like not citing sources in a paper, or violating the honor code by not reporting something that should have been reported,lol so some people get entirely screened out for cheating in undergrad and then ya go ahead and let em repeat in med school
Do you know anyone that failed out of medical school? Do you know why they failed out? I'm struggling and I wonder why other students fail out.
To what do you attribute the success of your appeal? This is an inspiring story!I failed out as an MS 1. I failed too many classes. I had to go before the appeals committee. It was an uphill battle, but I won my appeal, dismissal was overturned. I graduated, passed the Steps, became a resident and am currently Chief Resident in my last year of residency. Applied for fellowship and interviewed every place I applied (top programs too). It's possible to overcome obstacles. Don't give up.
To what do you attribute the success of your appeal? This is an inspiring story!
Well, for one, I never made enemies, so my appeals committee was full of people who didn't know me as a jerk. My appeal letter, which was 8 pages, laid out a comprehensive strategy to succeed, which included regular meetings with our education guru among other things. I think they just wanted to give me another shot. There was a catch and that was that I couldn't fail anything else for the remainder of the 4 years or it would be automatic dismissal. You can imagine the stress of walking out of every test, knowing it was the difference between becoming a doctor and not. Fortunately, I made it through pre-clinicals, then kicked ass on the wards. I did a lot of aways during 4th year and matched at my top choice. I was very, very lucky because my residency PD is amazing and while I'm not definitely not the smartest, I think he likes me because I'm very hard working and have been all along. He wrote me a glowing letter for fellowship and it's come up at every interview how strong a letter he wrote for me. He's an influential person so I know he opened doors for me that may have otherwise been closed.
I feel bad that this is happening to you. I'm also a student that struggled a lot with memorization on the preclinical years, especially MS1. I'm so thankful each day that I managed to reign it in and pass the step. I also hear ya when you mention the genetic thing. Some of my friends seem to memorize stuff instantly as if it were normal, while I felt I had to study around the clock all the time.I feel your pain, I'm probably going to be dismissed, I can't seem to pass Step 1 no matter how much I study. I got this from another thread but here you go.
As someone who has failed step 1 twice, med students have very biased unrealistic views on a lot of stuff. The first being you can take any guy off the street give him FA and time to study and he can pass Step 1 I had a decent MCAT, never failed a single class in the first 2 years, and I just can’t get past this test. There is just way too much ****ing stuff to remember. Med students act as if its normal to be able to memorize everything in an 800 page book and a 2500 question Q bank, no that **** is not normal. No matter how many times I go over this **** I just can’t retain it and that’s probably genetic. A lot of med students don’t have problems with step 1 and assume because they didn’t that anybody could do it. Thats like saying anybody could be a running back in the NFL if they are willing to work hard enough.
I think some people never grasp how to study efficiently which is in a word, studying by application. Usually that means tons of practice questions and in addition putting serious time in. I’m in 3rd year, every 6 week rotation I read a textbook or equivalent and do AT A MINIMUM 1,000 practice questions, sometimes as many as 2,000. I do school approximately 12-15 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Other reasons for failure to succeed in Med school are usually insufficient background (I.e. did not know enough coming in and probably should not have been accepted - notice I mentioned what they knew, not what grades they got in undergrad, as you can get good grades in undergrad by memorization usually). Significant other reasons: depression, lack of motivation due to not being in the right field, not sleeping adequately (7+ hours per night), not exercising, trying to learn via cram and purge, focusing on lectures and lecture slides, which are usually worthless, life struggles (family, significant others, etc.), and so on.
I think this is all really valuable information especially for those of us just starting even if we're currently doing well.
In that vein, can you tell me a little more about why we shouldn't be focused on lectures? I feel like I can't do that because the bulk of my grades come from lecturer written exams. Are you referring to always looking forward to step and incorporating board materials early? Or is there actually a way to do well on lecturer written exams without focusing on lectures?
In all fairness, the words "weak student" shouldn't apply to someone in med school because you have to be a strong student at the university level just to get into med school. Use the term weak students for people that can't make it out of HS or college. A lot of PhDs underestimate how challenging getting a MD is, hate to say this but a lot of them are PhDs because they couldn't get into med school, I guess they are weak students.
Indeed. This may come as a surprise to some SDNers, but not all of us PhDs wanted to become doctors. I was pre-med for about 10 minutes.This is a ridicoulous statement. In order to complete a Ph.d, you have to be good/strong with the subject matter. If you can't get through the pre-med requirements, you won't even get in to a Ph.d program in Chem or Physics or Math. Remember now: when you took your pre-med reqs, those were Ph.d's teaching you. That statement is as stupid as saying this: Well, people became bus drivers because they are not capable of driving cars and therefore can't drive taxi's. Hellooooo lights out nobody home!!!!!
Of my friends from HS and university, the better students got PhDs. IMO you have to be smarter for a science PhD than for MD, but you have to work harder for MD than for PhD. (obviously both are smart, both work hard, but this refers to the minimal requirement to pass each one.)This is a ridicoulous statement. In order to complete a Ph.d, you have to be good/strong with the subject matter. If you can't get through the pre-med requirements, you won't even get in to a Ph.d program in Chem or Physics or Math. Remember now: when you took your pre-med reqs, those were Ph.d's teaching you. That statement is as stupid as saying this: Well, people became bus drivers because they are not capable of driving cars and therefore can't drive taxi's. Hellooooo lights out nobody home!!!!!
I have friends who completed doctorates at top programs in engineering and computer science and lmao, they were such slackers. Not buying it.Well my Ph.d is in Geophysics and I am a medical student doing rotations. Hands down Ph.d is NOT LESS WORK! Also, I have had students in my cohort (they were getting great grades) that were asked to drop to a Masters because they were not creative enough when it came to dissertation/research.
I agree with your first sentence. I go to a low tier school and my classmates are pretty smart. Heck, I was a strong student in nursing school while working 4o hrs/wk, and now I am what people would consider a 'weak' student in med school. Med students tend to underestimate their intelligence.In all fairness, the words "weak student" shouldn't apply to someone in med school because you have to be a strong student at the university level just to get into med school. Use the term weak students for people that can't make it out of HS or college. A lot of PhDs underestimate how challenging getting a MD is, hate to say this but a lot of them are PhDs because they couldn't get into med school, I guess they are weak students.
The thing about the step is that it is designed differently than your classes. You can become really good at your classes through a method that's not conductive to learning for the step. I would say that you would have benefited most from starting very early and finishing as many QBanks as you possibly could have. Adding things that helped you learn in classes would be beneficial. Some people kept notebooks about q-bank content and others made flashcards. I think if I had done flashcards based on q-bank highlights I would have done better. If you're just doing the questions and moving on, this is probably destroying you.
REALLY depends on the undergrad. And the med school, I suppose. Neither my undergrad nor my med school offered multiple choice tests, and I'd say that conceptually speaking, the undergrad tests were an order of magnitude higher.Basic sciences by itself is not hard. It's the testing that is hard because you are dealing with third and fourth order questions which is a big difference from the "name this bone" in undergrad. I don't know anybody who walked into an exam feeling 100% confident that they knew everything about everything.
Being that medical school moves so fast, those who do well are those who adapt and figure out how to test well on the material.
I went to a Caribbean program so the attrition was much higher because people are not screened like in the US. But even there, nobody was stupid. If you can teach a monkey to test well, the monkey can become a doctor too.
I'm appalled that some of you can't understand the simple concept that one can be a smart pre-med, but a weak medical student, even to the point of failing. Your GPAs don't define who you are as a person, either. A struggling student is not a bad person, either.I agree with your first sentence. I go to a low tier school and my classmates are pretty smart. Heck, I was a strong student in nursing school while working 4o hrs/wk, and now I am what people would consider a 'weak' student in med school. Med students tend to underestimate their intelligence.
Why did the person get kicked out of residency ?I know someone who failed out of Residency. He did well academically during M1-M2, scored around the mean for Step 1 and 2, matched, then got kicked out of Residency after first year in a 3 year program.
Now he has an MD Degree and lives with his parents. Wont return emails and no one knows what happened. Sadly the guy had a chip on his shoulder, bragged a great deal about his school test scores, treated women like objects of pleasure, had no close friends and called everyone “haters”. He was generally Axis II in the worst way.
It isnt enough to pass Step 1/2, MD school and Residency. You gotta pass at life. Roll with the punches or be a failure with or without an MD degree
Cue that Failedatlife guy on SDN
Our wise resident and attending colleagues have reported that people get kicked out for personality issues, being unteachable, substance abuse issues or being threats to patient safety. I'm sure that the list is longer.Why did the person get kicked out of residency ?
Do you think it was a maturity issue for the inappropriate fit for anasthesia person considering the bad attitude? The second person sounds like a robot.The resident I worked with that got fired was a completely inappropriate fit for anesthesia. Anesthesia isn’t a chill field where you just stool sit and collect the loot. Though a good anesthesiologist will make it look that way.
When the stuff hits the fan, you have to get it done, often alone. He couldn’t. He also had a bad attitude. Though that only helped make the decision easier for everyone.
He was supported in his transition to Family Medicine. He wasn’t untrainable, just a poor fit.
There was an intern in my class that got fired. He was a disaster. Tested very well, but had very poor clinical judgement, impossible to remediate, poor insight, seemed to lack common sense, lazy, the list goes on. He could pass the tests, but not do the job.
I’d be surprised if he’s a physician in the US today.
--
Il Destriero
Why did the person get kicked out of residency ?
Do you think it was a maturity issue for the inappropriate fit for anasthesia person considering the bad attitude? The second person sounds like a robot.
i would love to sit in on one of those.Do all schools have to do the day at the State Medical Board where they watch each hearing? That was a terrifying couple hours. Extremely effective for scaring the living **** (and any academic/professional dishonesty you have left in you) out of most folks
i would love to sit in on one of those.
I'm appalled that some of you can't understand the simple concept that one can be a smart pre-med, but a weak medical student, even to the point of failing.
I would hope that one would gather from my posts, especially in this thread, that I have been referring to medical students.We all get that, but you never say weak "medical" student, that would make more sense, you always say weak student.
The resident I worked with that got fired was a completely inappropriate fit for anesthesia. Anesthesia isn’t a chill field where you just stool sit and collect the loot. Though a good anesthesiologist will make it look that way.
When the stuff hits the fan, you have to get it done, often alone. He couldn’t. He also had a bad attitude. Though that only helped make the decision easier for everyone.
He was supported in his transition to Family Medicine. He wasn’t untrainable, just a poor fit.
There was an intern in my class that got fired. He was a disaster. Tested very well, but had very poor clinical judgement, impossible to remediate, poor insight, seemed to lack common sense, lazy, the list goes on. He could pass the tests, but not do the job.
I’d be surprised if he’s a physician in the US today.
--
Il Destriero
Wow ngl this made me tear up a littleWell, for one, I never made enemies, so my appeals committee was full of people who didn't know me as a jerk. My appeal letter, which was 8 pages, laid out a comprehensive strategy to succeed, which included regular meetings with our education guru among other things. I think they just wanted to give me another shot. There was a catch and that was that I couldn't fail anything else for the remainder of the 4 years or it would be automatic dismissal. You can imagine the stress of walking out of every test, knowing it was the difference between becoming a doctor and not. Fortunately, I made it through pre-clinicals, then kicked ass on the wards. I did a lot of aways during 4th year and matched at my top choice. I was very, very lucky because my residency PD is amazing and while I'm not definitely not the smartest, I think he likes me because I'm very hard working and have been all along. He wrote me a glowing letter for fellowship and it's come up at every interview how strong a letter he wrote for me. He's an influential person so I know he opened doors for me that may have otherwise been closed.
It is quite rare for a resident to be a poor fit for their chosen specialty. The vast majority who start, finish without complications. A surgery attending once said that as a resident, his PD felt he was incapable of doing general surgery and indicated it was a poor fit for his talents. He persisted and is a good surgeon without any issues.
More than likely, I suspect those deemed as incapable probably do not have as much interest or motivation to continuously fine-tune their knowledge or skills. Perhaps some of the clinical disposition for that specialty aren't what they can adapt to. For example, I don't like emergencies or making decisions in a split second, as such I ruled out EM or anesthesia. Richard Axel, a Nobel laureate, admits to being a terrible medical/clinical trainee, but his passion was in research and he seemed to end up in medicine by default. A current anesthesiologist was encouraged to leave an IM program. She had difficulties managing multiple patients, however she just hated doing it and preferred to deal with one patient at a time. I suspect this pattern is common for residents who change specialties.
Jesus... that's is extremely impressive and admirable. I'm doing pretty well in my classes, but if I walked into every test knowing a fail means failing out of the program, I sincerely think I would have a nervous breakdown. Just holding it together under those conditions is impressive to me. Good job!Well, for one, I never made enemies, so my appeals committee was full of people who didn't know me as a jerk. My appeal letter, which was 8 pages, laid out a comprehensive strategy to succeed, which included regular meetings with our education guru among other things. I think they just wanted to give me another shot. There was a catch and that was that I couldn't fail anything else for the remainder of the 4 years or it would be automatic dismissal. You can imagine the stress of walking out of every test, knowing it was the difference between becoming a doctor and not. Fortunately, I made it through pre-clinicals, then kicked ass on the wards. I did a lot of aways during 4th year and matched at my top choice. I was very, very lucky because my residency PD is amazing and while I'm not definitely not the smartest, I think he likes me because I'm very hard working and have been all along. He wrote me a glowing letter for fellowship and it's come up at every interview how strong a letter he wrote for me. He's an influential person so I know he opened doors for me that may have otherwise been closed.
i would love to sit in on one of those.