1
191440
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm currently a medical student, but my own observations in the past have led me to believe that doctors have very little patience or trust in their patients. Even abroad while working in the third world I have seen Americans or local citizens come in to visit Western physicians with high fevers, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other ailments and as soon as the patient leaves the doctor starts insulting the patient for being a hypochondriac. However, in my own experience abroad, nearly all Westerners do become ill, whether it's traveler's diarrhea, yellow fever, typhoid, malaria, dengue or something else. In fact, nearly 100% of travelers to Latin America, Asia and Africa DO contract traveler's diarrhea.
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous. First, the patient is a better expert at one thing than the doctor. And that is knowing their own symptoms, exposure history and medical history. The doctor is undoubtedly a better expert at pathology, medical science and treatment options. Only when these two powers are combined can medicine truly work effectively. Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word? It's nearly impossible. How would you figure out what symptoms they have? How would you figure out the possible exposures? Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
Matthew Pflaum
I'm currently a medical student, but my own observations in the past have led me to believe that doctors have very little patience or trust in their patients. Even abroad while working in the third world I have seen Americans or local citizens come in to visit Western physicians with high fevers, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other ailments and as soon as the patient leaves the doctor starts insulting the patient for being a hypochondriac. However, in my own experience abroad, nearly all Westerners do become ill, whether it's traveler's diarrhea, yellow fever, typhoid, malaria, dengue or something else. In fact, nearly 100% of travelers to Latin America, Asia and Africa DO contract traveler's diarrhea.
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous. First, the patient is a better expert at one thing than the doctor. And that is knowing their own symptoms, exposure history and medical history. The doctor is undoubtedly a better expert at pathology, medical science and treatment options. Only when these two powers are combined can medicine truly work effectively. Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word? It's nearly impossible. How would you figure out what symptoms they have? How would you figure out the possible exposures? Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
Matthew Pflaum
I'm currently a medical student, but my own observations in the past have led me to believe that doctors have very little patience or trust in their patients. Even abroad while working in the third world I have seen Americans or local citizens come in to visit Western physicians with high fevers, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other ailments and as soon as the patient leaves the doctor starts insulting the patient for being a hypochondriac. However, in my own experience abroad, nearly all Westerners do become ill, whether it's traveler's diarrhea, yellow fever, typhoid, malaria, dengue or something else. In fact, nearly 100% of travelers to Latin America, Asia and Africa DO contract traveler's diarrhea.
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous. First, the patient is a better expert at one thing than the doctor. And that is knowing their own symptoms, exposure history and medical history. The doctor is undoubtedly a better expert at pathology, medical science and treatment options. Only when these two powers are combined can medicine truly work effectively. Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word? It's nearly impossible. How would you figure out what symptoms they have? How would you figure out the possible exposures? Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
Matthew Pflaum
I disagree. There are plenty of instances when you can tell that a patient has been lying to you. When they claim their sugars never went over 170 and then their HbA1c comes back at 11%, you can be fairly sure they're lying to you. Or when their drug screen comes back with a pharmacopoeia of drug classes and they claim they haven't touched anything illicit in a year. You have to remain discerning and avoid outright naivete.Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
I'm currently a medical student, but my own observations in the past have led me to believe that doctors have very little patience or trust in their patients. Even abroad while working in the third world I have seen Americans or local citizens come in to visit Western physicians with high fevers, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other ailments and as soon as the patient leaves the doctor starts insulting the patient for being a hypochondriac. However, in my own experience abroad, nearly all Westerners do become ill, whether it's traveler's diarrhea, yellow fever, typhoid, malaria, dengue or something else. In fact, nearly 100% of travelers to Latin America, Asia and Africa DO contract traveler's diarrhea.
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous. First, the patient is a better expert at one thing than the doctor. And that is knowing their own symptoms, exposure history and medical history. The doctor is undoubtedly a better expert at pathology, medical science and treatment options. Only when these two powers are combined can medicine truly work effectively. Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word? It's nearly impossible. How would you figure out what symptoms they have? How would you figure out the possible exposures? Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
Matthew Pflaum
Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word?
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous.
By the way, the very fact all of you immediately tell me that patients lie proves how broken the system is! I wasn't even talking about patients lying! When I returned from Africa do you think I was lying when I told the doctor, "I could have malaria." No, of course not. I know that there are probably 300 million malaria cases every year. I have had malaria before. I was in an area that had malarial drug resistance. I missed some of my medications. I felt sick all summer. The fact I was "asymptomatic" as the resident said was completely besides the point because malaria IS ASYMPTOMATIC 95% OF THE TIME! (Just like with dengue, yellow fever, and just about every infectious disease other than HIV/AIDS but INCLUDING TB!). So...those points I gave you above...rather than being from a stupid patient who doesn't know what they are talking about...they are succinct, reasoned thoughts with accompanying scientific and medical evidence. I choose to think that every patient has this in mind when going to a physician, and indeed I believe this is the only way it can work and explains why so many cases, illnesses and maladies never have a determined source.
Nobody cares about your little malaria story, dude.
We get it, you're smarter than everyone at Emory.
Move on.
You obviously come in here with an axe to grind. This isn't a discussion of the increased skepticism of doctors today or the difficulties in modern patient/doctor relationships, it's a rant.
...Before Semelweiss (the man in my profile image), doctors and nurses didn't regularly wash their hands...I just wanted to see how other people felt about the situation. I argued this at times with other students while in graduate school at Emory who were going to medical school and they basically agreed with all of you: Doctors should decide how to treat the patient and more or less ignore the patient because they are idiots and nobody has the patience, time or money to run all the tests for their hypochondriac patients.
I'm currently a medical student, but my own observations in the past have led me to believe that doctors have very little patience or trust in their patients. Even abroad while working in the third world I have seen Americans or local citizens come in to visit Western physicians with high fevers, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and other ailments and as soon as the patient leaves the doctor starts insulting the patient for being a hypochondriac. However, in my own experience abroad, nearly all Westerners do become ill, whether it's traveler's diarrhea, yellow fever, typhoid, malaria, dengue or something else. In fact, nearly 100% of travelers to Latin America, Asia and Africa DO contract traveler's diarrhea.
It seems to me that many doctors have very little respect or trust for their patients, and I find this dangerous. First, the patient is a better expert at one thing than the doctor. And that is knowing their own symptoms, exposure history and medical history. The doctor is undoubtedly a better expert at pathology, medical science and treatment options. Only when these two powers are combined can medicine truly work effectively. Imagine treating a patient who can't speak a single word? It's nearly impossible. How would you figure out what symptoms they have? How would you figure out the possible exposures? Yet as soon as patients say something so many doctors outright reject what the patient says as nonsense. Doctors must trust their patients and patients must trust their doctors, for how else can medicine remain effective?
Matthew Pflaum
Actually, I eschewed mentioning this before, but both times I have returned from Africa I was refused a malaria test by numerous doctors in the states.
We get it, you're all puffed-up about this.
But seriously, I think most people are getting about 2-lines into your post and then . . . 😴
Confirmed.
We get it, you're all puffed-up about this.
But seriously, I think most people are getting about 2-lines into your post and then . . . 😴