Does anyone have the data on acceptance rate percentage per major?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Azjoe

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I remember that a post was made a long time ago showing which majors had very high acceptance rates. I was talking to someone about this and wanted to review it. I have searched the boards but can't seem to locate it.

I hope that I am being clear.

Thanks

Joe
 
Uhm, isn't it obvious? Do Biology. Who cares if you don't like it! It's what med schools want to see. So definitely do Biology.
 
I did, but if I remember correctly History had the highest percentage of accepted applicants. That table is helpful but not what I was talking about.
 
do a math, physics, and computer science, usually one of those (CSC) have the lowest applicant numbers.
 
physical science majors owned on the MCAT. Go for that, seems to prepare you pretty well...
 
wow that science gpa is lower than i thought it was
 
53% Humanities
49% Physical Sciences
48% Math and Stats
45% Social Studies
44% Biological Sciences
42% Other
34% Specialized Health Sciences

According to linked webpage above.

Anyone know what category kinesiology majors would fall under? Biological? Health? Other?
 
maybe i am just naive, but what is the use of a humanities major if you don't go to medical school or some sort of professional school. in other words, i think if you risk it with a humanities major your kind of doomed if you don't get it.
 
I did, but if I remember correctly History had the highest percentage of accepted applicants. That table is helpful but not what I was talking about.

Not exactly what you're looking for, but at a lot of schools I've interviewed at it's been mentioned that History was one of their most common majors, and sometimes even beating out Biology in terms of numbers. (I was a history major, which is why it's been coming up....although it's also been mentioned just in general speeches by the admissions dean at several schools....)
 
maybe i am just naive, but what is the use of a humanities major if you don't go to medical school or some sort of professional school. in other words, i think if you risk it with a humanities major your kind of doomed if you don't get it.
you could always do graduate studies in your major. or you can get a regular job like anyone else
 
you could always do graduate studies in your major. or you can get a regular job like anyone else

haha FINE, including graduate studies too.

but like as a humanities major, for example history, u don't have the logic and problem solving abilities as say a physics major. i am excluding any jobs not related to your major. like after college i don't get into med school i can get hired by any computer firm (from google to microsoft) doing stuff i learned during undergrad, but what are you going to do with a humanities major.
 
maybe i am just naive, but what is the use of a humanities major if you don't go to medical school or some sort of professional school. in other words, i think if you risk it with a humanities major your kind of doomed if you don't get it.

Well, part of it is that a humanities major gives you strong skills that carry over into almost any field....research, analytical, and writing skills among others. In fact, medicine and hard science are probably the only fields that a humanities major can't just switch to without extra schooling. I see your point, but I think that for the types of jobs most people with a college education are considering a humanities degree is fairly translatable. (I mean, yeah, a degree in history isn't going to help me in, say, retail, but neither would a degree in biology.)


physical science majors owned on the MCAT. Go for that, seems to prepare you pretty well...

I've heard the reverse, that humanities majors do very well on the MCAT because all of it is essentially a reading comprehension test....even the bio and physical sciences section (which is also why brilliant non-native english speakers sometimes have trouble with the MCAT). I mean, probably 70% of the answers in those two sections are given to you in either the passage or the question itself.... Of ocourse, it's probably one of those things where you hear that whatever major you are does the best on the MCAT. 🙂
 
haha FINE, including graduate studies too.

but like as a humanities major, for example history, u don't have the logic and problem solving abilities as say a physics major. i am excluding any jobs not related to your major. like after college i don't get into med school i can get hired by any computer firm (from google to microsoft) doing stuff i learned during undergrad, but what are you going to do with a humanities major.

Actually, almost all of history is analysis and problem solving. Actual study of history isn't **** like memorizing dates, it's research and piecing together evidence very much like in science....except that nothing can be just solved by applying an equation, each question has a unique solution.
 
foofish: i buy ur arguments on writing, haha as you can probably tell my writing abilities are less than par. however, research? analytic? and what kind of jobs are you referring to. i was more thinking along the lines of say: history majors becoming history teacher or philosophy majors becoming ethicist and etc.
 
According to my graph analyzing skills, chem majors do it best!
 
foofish: i buy ur arguments on writing, haha as you can probably tell my writing abilities are less than par. however, research? analytic? and what kind of jobs are you referring to. i was more thinking along the lines of say: history majors becoming history teacher or philosophy majors becoming ethicist and etc.

Well, if you take an event....say the end of the Cold War....it's not like one person woke up and decided that hey, he'd end the Cold War today, and then get a $5 million book deal to write the definitive account. The causes and consequences of an event are set into motion long before anyone even recognizes it as happening. Plus, there are always different sides and perspectives, and always a huge number of people involved, and each of their actions, beliefs, and ideas impact everyone else...and there's always events and decisions being made in the private sector that impact the public sector without its knowledge....and piecing it all together is part of what "doing" history is....because there is never someone who has their finger on every single factor and component of an event at the time it is going on and who can explain their complex interrelationships.

I've done both history and science to a fairly advanced level, and at least personally I think physics/bio is much easier because there's a concrete answer and cause and action...you're applying known rules, or determining rules, which dictate behavior....in history you're looking at cause and action, but there are very few governing "rules" to guide your understanding.

As a history major I could have easily gone into law, publishing, politics, consulting, business/finance, etc....and those are only the fields that I was ever vaguely interested in, and which would not really have required extra training. History is a big, big feeder into Law and politics (it's sort of the biology of med school applicants).
 
foolfish: haha i feel like we are stealing the thread, maybe we should discuss this off thread.
 
haha FINE, including graduate studies too.

but like as a humanities major, for example history, u don't have the logic and problem solving abilities as say a physics major. i am excluding any jobs not related to your major. like after college i don't get into med school i can get hired by any computer firm (from google to microsoft) doing stuff i learned during undergrad, but what are you going to do with a humanities major.

That's highly debatable. I'm getting a minor in the Humanities and I find that with some of those courses, I'm learning better problem solving skills than I do with some of the science courses I've taken. It's just problem solving and critical thinking in a different field.

And also, there's quite a few jobs that having a humanities major would be good in if you would look things up. Writing for a magazine, publishing, museum curator, etc.
 
After reading the thread through, I say 👍 to foofish for doing a good job putting across the points I was just going to make
 
I've heard the reverse, that humanities majors do very well on the MCAT because all of it is essentially a reading comprehension test....even the bio and physical sciences section (which is also why brilliant non-native english speakers sometimes have trouble with the MCAT). I mean, probably 70% of the answers in those two sections are given to you in either the passage or the question itself.... Of ocourse, it's probably one of those things where you hear that whatever major you are does the best on the MCAT. 🙂

well, i was just adding the 3 section averages by major that AAMC provided for 2006 matriculants. Physical Science was highest. It completely owned biological sciences. Not sure where humanities fell, but PS was the highest.
 
Do what you enjoy. Medical schools give no preference to a particular major over another. Zip, zero, nada, none. Do what you like...
 
Can't agree with TPROrgoTutor2 more. If you do something you enjoy, you'll presumably do better and also get more satisfaction from it. You'll also be a much more passionate and interesting applicant.
 
to the OP- i don't think the major affect the chances of getting accepted...according to the stats posted on this thread...there isn't much of a difference!
 
well at my school at least, Kinesiology is the ultimate non-major. No one has ANY respect for it. to tell you the truth, its considered more pathetic than even Turfgrass Science. Please for your own sake change your major.
 
Top