- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 1
Is anyone else here pinning all of their hopes on a good August 2006 MCAT score? In other words, do you have a sh*tty GPA like me and your only saving grace is a good-really good MCAT score (30 +)
(10 X your GPA) + your MCAT = your score
(10 X avg GPA of school in MSAR book) + MCAT average -1 (-1 is for the bottom 50% of the class)
If your number is higher than their number than you havea good chance.
If your BCPM GPA is less than 3.4 I don't think 31 or 32 would be enough??? You probably would need 35+ on the MCAT!
If you have 3.2 and get 33 on the MCAT, technically you still are less qualified than a guy who gets 3.7 and 29 on the MCAT - this is according to that formual GPA x10 + MCAT + other intangibles
"3.2 and get 33 on the MCAT, technically you still are less qualified than a guy who gets 3.7 and 29 "
1st case 32+33=65
2nd case 37+29=66
These applicants are about the same. This equation seems like 60-55% GPA and 40-45% MCAT
I'll make up another case---------------
3rd case 3.5 GPA and 30 MCAT = 65
One other thing that is very obvious is just how important the MCAT really is. A 1 point increase in your MCAT is equal to a 0.1 GPA increase, which is ALOT. Think how much work and credits it would take to increase your GPA from just a 3.6 to a 3.7 ( A LOT)
or you could just improve your MCAT from a 29 to a 30 for the same effect....
Most people get slightly more points from their GPA. It's probably more likely people will have 3.8-4.0 GPA, which equals 38-40 points
vs. Trying to get 38 or 40 points on the MCAT
So.....you can see why this equation gives a little more weight to GPA-55% to 60%
Lizzy the adcom on the pre-Allopathic gave us thgis equation
So far I've been rejected by all schools whos number-minus-one was higher than mine yet given interviews by ones that added up equal or less than my points
Thanks acrobat. Well I have many, strong ECs in different categories such as research, newspaper writing, clinical volunteering, teaching, and mentoring. Plus a lot of work experience. Would that help me any?
It will help but obviously the two most important factors are still your GPA and MCAT.
I had a friend with a lowish GPA at a UC (~3.3) who took the April MCAT and got a 38. He definitely needed a solid MCAT and he got it!
He's basically got his choice of mid-range schools and maybe is hovering at the doorstep of upper tier schools.
However, I bet your friend is now thinking...had he worked hard in undergrad and got the GPA he'd get his choice of Harvard\Hopkins whatever he wanted.
Then again, most of us regret not taking a few more classes seriously.
is this the famous Einstein's equation?
(10 X your GPA) + your MCAT = your score
(10 X avg GPA of school in MSAR book) + MCAT average -1 (-1 is for the bottom 50% of the class)
If your number is higher than their number than you havea good chance.
IOW, its the age-old question of "Can your MCAT make up for a crummy GPA???"
Short answer yes, with an if...
Long answer no, with a but...
*Edit* And this is totally NOT implying that I'm one of those ppl WITH the high MCAT and low GPA...cuz that's only half true...I just have the low GPA part down!
HAHA yes. OMG my premed counselor literally laughed in my face when I told him the lowGPA-highMCAT theory when I was a sophomore, that med schools would prefer them cuz the MCAT predicts USMLE performance. I was basically trying to make myself feel human after being dumped on for an hour about what a bad applicant I was. Oh well I'm still sticking behind this theory...for better or for worse! I still think that a 3.0/40 MCAT is hella better than a 3.8/28 MCAT. oh well..😎
*Edit* And this is totally NOT implying that I'm one of those ppl WITH the high MCAT and low GPA...cuz that's only half true...I just have the low GPA part down!
To those adcoms who laugh at the low GPA / high MCAT applicants, I say **** them.yenisha said:OMG my premed counselor literally laughed in my face when I told him the lowGPA-highMCAT theory when I was a sophomore, that med schools would prefer them cuz the MCAT predicts USMLE performance.
My GPA is 3.25 (uchicago, chem major)
I need 38 👍
I should've gone to my state school and got a 4.0
The large GPA variance among different colleges is seriously bull****.
To those adcoms who laugh at the low GPA / high MCAT applicants, I say **** them.
My 3.25 chem major is still a crapload harder than any 4.0 from UIC etc.
The worst thing though is my alma mater would likely still take some 4.0 from UIC with a 38 than me with a 38.
Hopefully I can raise my 3.25 to 3.35 at the end of this year. But that would require superhuman dedication as I have to get almost 3.9 for a year at uchicago, which is like impossible since some professors here give out like one A (4 points) for a class of 30.
Well, it's a lot better!
3.8/28 MCAT = 66
3.0/40MCAT = 70
going by the equation could predict, however,
4.0\30 MCAT =70 points
3.0\40 MCAT =70 points
In reality the 40 MCAT is better because that person is basically going to get in no matter what eventually. Send him\her to a post-bach and get a 3.5 and they in. Also some schools would be desire someone with an exceptional score like this and might make an exception to get him\her if they applied to enough schools.
But say the person was a 40 MCAT and a 2.5 gpa. We could say the same thing..
Well, it's a lot better!
3.8/28 MCAT = 66
3.0/40MCAT = 70
going by the equation could predict, however,
4.0\30 MCAT =70 points
3.0\40 MCAT =70 points
In reality the 40 MCAT is better because that person is basically going to get in no matter what eventually. Send him\her to a post-bach and get a 3.5 and they in. Also some schools would be desire someone with an exceptional score like this and might make an exception to get him\her if they applied to enough schools.
But say the person was a 40 MCAT and a 2.5 gpa. We could say the same thing..
That's faulty logic. A 40 on the MCAT doesn't necessarily indicate that the person has higher potential. Perhaps he got lucky. Perhaps when you send him to a post-bacc, he's just going to end up with a 3.0 again. Who's to say that the 4.0 GPA student didn't have an off day? Using your logic, we should just send him to take the MCAT again and get a 35 the second time.
I would much rather have a high GPA and low MCAT than vice-versa. Looking at applied/accepted charts from my school last year:
Acceptance rate of applicants with 3.9+ GPA-100%
Acceptance rate of applicants with 35+ MCAT score 83%
Why? Because a 3.9 is much much harder to get than a 35. Only 6% of applicants at my school had a 3.9+ while nearly a quarter had a 35+ MCAT.
Unless you go to a top-tier research university, that's bull. 35 MCAT is 95-97 percentile. 36 MCAT is 97-98 percentile. And if you did go to a top-tier university, then it's irrelevant, as I and others were talking about the less-than-elite large state schools where there are countless numbers of ~4.0 students with under-30 MCATs.Why? Because a 3.9 is much much harder to get than a 35. Only 6% of applicants at my school had a 3.9+ while nearly a quarter had a 35+ MCAT.
It's an 8 hour test. There's no luck to it, a guy who gets a 40 obviously knows his material cold. 40 MCAT is 99.9 percentile. A person with a 3.9 getting a 30 suggests three possibilities: 1. he went to a large state school probably with an easy major; 2. he forgots everything (basic science concepts) and thus his ability of recalling and applying knowledge in the long-term should be questioned; or 3. he cannot perform under stress (he probably shouldn't go into medicine if that's the case).BigRedPremed said:A 40 on the MCAT doesn't necessarily indicate that the person has higher potential. Perhaps he got lucky.
Unless you go to a tiny first-tier research university, that's bull. 35 MCAT is 95-97 percentile. 36 MCAT is 97-98 percentile. And if you did go to a tiny top-tier university, then it's irrelevant, as I and others were talking about large state schools where there are countless numbers of ~4.0 students with under-30 MCATs.
It's an 8 hour test. There's no luck to it, a guy who gets a 40 obviously knows his material cold. 40 MCAT is 99.9 percentile. A person with a 3.9 getting a 30 suggests three possibilities: 1. he went to a large state school probably with an easy major; 2. he forgots everything (basic science concepts) and thus his ability of recalling and applying knowledge in the long-term should be questioned; or 3. he cannot perform under stress (he probably shouldn't go into medicine if that's the case).
Yeah certainly, I would want 4.0/30 too (especially if it's from UofC), but doesn't necessarily mean 4.0/30 is more fit for med school than a 3.0/40; it's difficult to compare without more info. 😛 The only truly objective measure is the MCAT and apparently it's not as important as GPA. But people who go to competitive universities and do hard majors get shafted on that end. I'm one of them. Pchem and Inorganic are much harder than most of the bio courses here (I get A's in my bio courses); and the bio courses here are much harder than they are in UIC.Edit: I also agree with you that at state schools there will be more people with high GPA's than high MCAT's. But the fact is, a 4.0 GPA and a 30 MCAT is serviceable. A 3.0 GPA will get you screened off presecondary, regardless of your MCAT. So whether I attend a state school or a school like Cornell or Chicago, I'd want the 4.0/30 rather than the 3.0/40.
I've been reading mdapplicants, and it's been extremely depressing.
People with below 3.2 GPA (from top-tier undergrad univs), but 39+ MCAT are still not getting into top-tier med schools at all, even with impressive extracurriculars and grad school.
Looks like it's true, would rather have 4.0/30 than 3.0/40. Don't agree with it though.