It's a cool idea to try to streamline your interview with your documentation, but I think it ultimately isn't worth practicing as there are more efficient solutions or else everyone would be using the rocket notebooks. I'm an old soul who has never stopped writing things down, but as I progressed I learned to jot down only a few words with arrows (key dates, names, etc.) and then I derive narratives from those notes. I feel that allows me to focus the most on the patient in front of me first while putting all the necessary details in the note. The alternative (if you prefer to interview/document simultaneously) is to just bring in a COW (computer on wheels) and type as you interview. I do that on call when I have several >2 H&Ps/hr. to write so I can put in admission orders in too while writing the A&P. Writing things down in a neat enough fashion while you are interacting with a patient so you convert it to digital text and copy that into note isn't feasible in my opinion as no one can physically write that fast while simultaneously interacting with the patient. You'll likely have to run through the digital translation again and edit that as your handwritten notes will have flaws that spellcheck would have caught while you were typing. You either sacrifice the quality of the interview, the quality of documentation, or the speed of your work. It may work in medical school when you have 3-4 patients and only write 1-2 H&Ps per day, but afterwards the system may become a hassle. Again, my opinion. Take it with a grain of salt.
Ultimately, find a system and stick to it. My thought is that the Rocket Book solution may work now but you may be forced to abandon it in residency.
