Does tutoring/mentoring children from underserved communities count as non-clinical volunteering?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

zappyapples

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Essentially the title; I've been volunteering for a while at an afterschool program for kids from underserved neighborhoods in my city. Tutoring, mentoring, playing sports with them, teaching them healthy habits/skills, etc.

But I recently heard conflicting information that this doesn't count as non-clinical volunteering. This forms a substantial part of my service narrative so I would appreciate anyone's thoughts. Thank you.
 
this sounds like non-clinical volunteering to me. what information have you heard otherwise?
Other threads across SDN and Reddit like these:



There seems to be conflicting answers.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Other threads across SDN and Reddit like these:



There seems to be conflicting answers.

Many experiences fall under multiple categories. One of the goals of non-clinical volunteering is to demonstrate your ability to go outside of your comfort zone, i.e., the typical college bubble.

For example, the following three activities count as both teaching and non-clinical volunteering: unpaid tutoring of underperforming underclassmen, tutoring children in underserved communities (like you are doing), and helping those who are incarcerated to obtain their GED, but the latter two show your willingness to embrace situations that are often more challenging/uncomfortable.

Just my thoughts.
 
You're thinking about the difference between nonclinical volunteering and the subset of those activities that are considered to align with "service orientation." It's an AAMC competency for incoming medical students that has been obliquely adapted as a pseudo-requirement.

When you start applying and have to compose a school list, you'll notice there are two basic categories: the big research schools everyone knows, and more mission-fit community programs (everyone else).

All schools are going to want service orientation activities, especially at the big research schools that get an excess of qualified students. The mission-fit schools are going to be more forgiving of reinvention and value service orientation activities much more than research.

Don't get me wrong, all schools want everything, but in terms of proportion, mission-fit schools are going to be more forgiving of straightforward, nonproductive research experiences in exchange for extensive service orientation activities that reassure them you will devote this next piece of your training to their community.
 
Essentially the title; I've been volunteering for a while at an afterschool program for kids from underserved neighborhoods in my city. Tutoring, mentoring, playing sports with them, teaching them healthy habits/skills, etc.

But I recently heard conflicting information that this doesn't count as non-clinical volunteering. This forms a substantial part of my service narrative so I would appreciate anyone's thoughts. Thank you.
The devil is in the details, and sometimes there is no singular right answer.

Your particular issue is knotted up because of the specific AMCAS category for teaching/tutoring. You mention that part of your activities with this program include tutoring and "teaching them healthy habits/skills," so perhaps placing this activity in that category would be reasonable. However, it may not capture the true gestalt of what you did, and depending on your description it may be appropriate to label it as non-clinical volunteering.

IMHO schools will think your work with this program is perfectly good. However, there is an inherent distinction between activities where you are the expert/leader versus those where you are more of a peer. A homeless shelter is a good example of the latter. It is generally advisable to diversify one's volunteering up to a point, so that no single activity has to do all the lifting.
 
Many experiences fall under multiple categories. One of the goals of non-clinical volunteering is to demonstrate your ability to go outside of your comfort zone, i.e., the typical college bubble.

For example, the following three activities count as both teaching and non-clinical volunteering: unpaid tutoring of underperforming underclassmen, tutoring children in underserved communities (like you are doing), and helping those who are incarcerated to obtain their GED, but the latter two show your willingness to embrace situations that are often more challenging/uncomfortable.

Just my thoughts.
Agree 100% with my learned colleague
 
I completely understand where you're coming from, but I wanted to share my own perspective and actual scores to show why I see this differently. I actually ended up earning a 515 on the MCAT, which sits right at the 90th percentile, and a 170 on the LSAT, which places me in the 96th percentile. Given that my track record reflects strong performance on both standardized metrics, I can confidently tell you that this doesn't align with standard non-clinical volunteering frameworks.
 
Agreeing with the above.

For the purposes of the application argument, "Teaching" is an academic communication skill, but "true" teaching involves much more significant planning and long-term student assessment. You will be entering "academic medicine" where teaching is expected for everyone.

But consider...
You can teach me how to change a tire. Is this non-clinical volunteering? How would that differ from showing me how to choose healthier foods at the grocery store? CPR training?

In other words, context matters. To me, I look at your activities and responsibilities separate from the recipients of your teaching/mentoring/tutoring/advising. How much are you accountable for the success of the people you teach? How much you are seen as the "subject matter expert" (i.e., teacher or role model) matters for my classification.

I also know not all admissions professionals in this area agree with my position, and many will consider it non-clinical volunteering. It just depends how many on an adcom believes one way or the other to set the rubrics up.