- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 512
- Reaction score
- 1
Does anyone else feel that being waitlisted is almost analagous to being rejected? I know that there are thousands of people who eventually get off of waitlists but that's not what I'm concerned with. It seems like schools will waitlist all of their non-accepted interviewed applicants rather than rejecting the ones they don't like. So far I've only heard of one school who has rejected an applicant post interview, that guy was me at UVA. Do schools just automatically waitlist their interviewees who aren't offered first round acceptances and then let them fade away in waitlist limbo? I don't really see the point of doing so, but it's the only reasoning that makes sense to me. Otherwise, I don't really see how I would consistantly be making into that narrow range of "almost but not quite" (4 waitlists thus far). Any thoughts?