SquarePlatapus
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2021
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 2
Students at my program recently completed finals and then received this email from the administration at my school:
“Good morning, Student Doctors!
Many of you are anxiously waiting for your final grades to be released. However, we are waiting for you to complete your evaluations in a eValue. Once a 75% response rate is reached on all evaluations, your scores will be released.
We appreciate your time.
Thank you,
OAA”
Is this common? We had a similar standoff back in December/January... I understand that feedback is important, but holding grades hostage until quotas are met seems ethically hazy. Is coercing students into leaving feedback the best way to get feedback for future improvements? For the amount of lecturing they've put us through on *~professionalism~*, this feels pretty childish.
OMS-IIs are entering dedicated and some students may not know if they passed the course and can actually focus on boards now or if they failed and need to seek remediation. Today, admin doubled down and changed their demands. They informed us that in addition to course evaluations, we'll need to submit additional individual evaluations for each faculty member. This is obnoxious and exhausting. Applicants beware, this is how you're treated at ARCOM.
“Good morning, Student Doctors!
Many of you are anxiously waiting for your final grades to be released. However, we are waiting for you to complete your evaluations in a eValue. Once a 75% response rate is reached on all evaluations, your scores will be released.
We appreciate your time.
Thank you,
OAA”
Is this common? We had a similar standoff back in December/January... I understand that feedback is important, but holding grades hostage until quotas are met seems ethically hazy. Is coercing students into leaving feedback the best way to get feedback for future improvements? For the amount of lecturing they've put us through on *~professionalism~*, this feels pretty childish.
OMS-IIs are entering dedicated and some students may not know if they passed the course and can actually focus on boards now or if they failed and need to seek remediation. Today, admin doubled down and changed their demands. They informed us that in addition to course evaluations, we'll need to submit additional individual evaluations for each faculty member. This is obnoxious and exhausting. Applicants beware, this is how you're treated at ARCOM.
Last edited: