- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 221
- Reaction score
- 0
Wow, finally done.😍
Here are my real DAT score.
PAT 25
QR 29
RC 19
Bio 19
G chem 19
O chem 20
TS 20
AA 21
Not as high as other SDNers
but I am happy with the result.
Kaplan - yea i took the course. If i were you i'll save up that money for applications 👎
not that their program is bad, but there are other resources that are cheaper and more helpful than the expensive course. If you don't have to worry about the $ then i would say go for it because it actually makes you study.
but the blue book was helpful.
Destroyer - the best of all. 👍 👍 👍 it's definitely a GOOD resource VERY VERY GOOD.
Topscore - pretty good to know where you are...biology wasn't as comparable as other sections though...gen chem and o chem were pretty comparable. PAT was BAD!!!! QR was similar. Many people said reading is wayyyyyy easy compared to the real one, but i thought they are similar in difficulty. It was just that real one had more tone, main idea questions.
Achiever - I got this like few days before my test, so I couldn't utilize it as much as other materials, but I could tell Achiever was way too harder than the real one.
Crack dat pat - this is all you need for PAT section like other SDNers said. 👍
Crack dat math - When I took DAT last year, timing was the biggest problem in QR section, and this thing helped me a BUNCH. I am quite happy with my QR score.
Here are my practice scores
Crack dat pat
test 1 = 21
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 18
test 4 = 21
test 5 = 23
test 6 = 22
test 7 = 21
test 8 = 20
Angles and hole punches are easier on the real one, and other sections are pretty similar
Crack dat math
test 1 = 20
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 28
test 4 = 22
test 5 = 22
test 6 = 23
real one was easier than crack dat.
my topscore scores are not available right now, but practice score was much lower than the real score.
I feel like i'm repeating what other people said, but i hope this is helpful to someone 🙂
Good luck everyone
Here are my real DAT score.
PAT 25
QR 29
RC 19
Bio 19
G chem 19
O chem 20
TS 20
AA 21
Not as high as other SDNers

but I am happy with the result.
Kaplan - yea i took the course. If i were you i'll save up that money for applications 👎
not that their program is bad, but there are other resources that are cheaper and more helpful than the expensive course. If you don't have to worry about the $ then i would say go for it because it actually makes you study.
but the blue book was helpful.
Destroyer - the best of all. 👍 👍 👍 it's definitely a GOOD resource VERY VERY GOOD.
Topscore - pretty good to know where you are...biology wasn't as comparable as other sections though...gen chem and o chem were pretty comparable. PAT was BAD!!!! QR was similar. Many people said reading is wayyyyyy easy compared to the real one, but i thought they are similar in difficulty. It was just that real one had more tone, main idea questions.
Achiever - I got this like few days before my test, so I couldn't utilize it as much as other materials, but I could tell Achiever was way too harder than the real one.
Crack dat pat - this is all you need for PAT section like other SDNers said. 👍
Crack dat math - When I took DAT last year, timing was the biggest problem in QR section, and this thing helped me a BUNCH. I am quite happy with my QR score.
Here are my practice scores
Crack dat pat
test 1 = 21
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 18
test 4 = 21
test 5 = 23
test 6 = 22
test 7 = 21
test 8 = 20
Angles and hole punches are easier on the real one, and other sections are pretty similar
Crack dat math
test 1 = 20
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 28
test 4 = 22
test 5 = 22
test 6 = 23
real one was easier than crack dat.
my topscore scores are not available right now, but practice score was much lower than the real score.
I feel like i'm repeating what other people said, but i hope this is helpful to someone 🙂
Good luck everyone
