- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Messages
- 1,279
- Reaction score
- 7
This is more of a curiosity question, and one I'm sure I will find the answer to on my own during the next couple of years of med school, but what the hell... I'm an impatient bastard.
How does the DO bias in allo-rads programs compare to other competitive specialties? For instance, it is widely known that DO's wanting to go into ortho pretty much have to go for osteo residency programs; on the other hand, there are plenty of primary care, ER, and IM allo programs that routinely fill spots with DO's. Obviously those are less competitive and more abundant, so that is understandable. Other specialties like Derm are relatively difficult to make the DO-MD transition, others like general surgery maybe a little less so.
It wouldn't surprise me at all that in a competitive field like rads, a DO looking at allo programs is already at somewhat of a disadvantage, but all things considered, is it a serious disadvantage? Such as is the case of ortho... you know, happens to one or two people a year kind of thing?
How does the DO bias in allo-rads programs compare to other competitive specialties? For instance, it is widely known that DO's wanting to go into ortho pretty much have to go for osteo residency programs; on the other hand, there are plenty of primary care, ER, and IM allo programs that routinely fill spots with DO's. Obviously those are less competitive and more abundant, so that is understandable. Other specialties like Derm are relatively difficult to make the DO-MD transition, others like general surgery maybe a little less so.
It wouldn't surprise me at all that in a competitive field like rads, a DO looking at allo programs is already at somewhat of a disadvantage, but all things considered, is it a serious disadvantage? Such as is the case of ortho... you know, happens to one or two people a year kind of thing?