I hate to defend specter in this case cause he was being a bit mean spiritied about it, but he is right on his points. Let me sort of parse out the two things about this little disagreement that makes both people right.
1) Specter is talking about the residency positions. These are the highly desirable spots everyone assumes they will get and (if i have been informed correctly) are the only/primary gateway into clinical pharmacy. They are massively competed for and seem to only go to a select few people from a select few elite-named schools because there are so much fewer of them than there are graduates. My friends are in florida and georgia, so they are in that southeast region and can attest it is quite the case there.
2) The other guy is talking about retail jobs and people from low name schools. Being fro that sort of school and being okay with a retail job would make the market seem much more open. I do not doubt there are excess retail jobs to be had. I heard of a rite aid positon offering just over 100K a year. My jaw hit the ground upon hearing that. But thats the money some retail positions will pay. Despite that, the people who go to name brand schools expect to get the elusive residency spots and might see the retail positions as beneath them. If they aren't considering them initially the market will seem exceptionally competitive. If they are only considering them, the market will seem exceptionally wide open.
Its all perspective. But since most people (i would assume) enroll expecting to do clinical pharmacy, and its become so difficult to get that (mind you, not impossible. But that competition is fierce), I can't really endorse pharm school unless you are confident you'd be okay with rite aid as a legitimate (likely?) outcome.