For a theoretical patient, what would you make of a folate level >44?
One of anemia and general not doing well workup. In that workup Iron and B12 resulted as low, and there is an unexplained mild but chronic eosinophilia; already be on folic acid 1 mg daily, but that I wouldn't think that is enough to explain a result greater than the upper limit of detection in this theoretical context.In what theoretical context?
Normally I might agree, if we were talking an asymptomatic patient or one whose symptoms were easily explained by known diagnoses. This feels like we need more info.Easy, stop checking it.
It's a pretty complex (theoretical) patient with a whole bunch of symptoms, and figuring out the cause each of the symptoms is difficult but progressing. I was surprised by the folate level, but more so have no idea what to do with it, if it matters, or why it might be so high. Hence this thread.Normally I might agree, if we were talking an asymptomatic patient or one whose symptoms were easily explained by known diagnoses. This feels like we need more info.
It's a pretty complex (theoretical) patient with a whole bunch of symptoms, and figuring out the cause each of the symptoms is difficult but progressing. I was surprised by the folate level, but more so have no idea what to do with it, if it matters, or why it might be so high. Hence this thread.
I'll inquire with the (theoretical) patientDid they recently eat a sandwich or a bowl of cheerios?
Just don’t do like the midlevels in our system and click “stat refer to heme”
One thing I read said pernicious anemia could do as you've described.I'll inquire with the (theoretical) patient
I wouldn't want to refer to heme for this, ya.
Thanks everybody for your input; sounds like nothing urgent. I guess my plan would be (in this theoretical case) to treat his B12 and iron deficiencies, chalk the high folate up to lab error/false increase/maybe increased absorption in response to other nutrition deficiencies.
They are eating more folate gummies than you prescribedOne of anemia and general not doing well workup. In that workup Iron and B12 resulted as low, and there is an unexplained mild but chronic eosinophilia; already be on folic acid 1 mg daily, but that I wouldn't think that is enough to explain a result greater than the upper limit of detection in this theoretical context.
I honestly don't even begin to have a differential or understanding the clinical significance (if any) of a theoretical result like that.
it's basically impossible to be folate deficit in the modern world; like 1 slice of bread is enough folate for a month.
I wouldn't worry about it. Maybe they recently came off folate supplementation. Either way it's more than likely clinically irrelevant unless you want to know if they were previously folate deficient and placed on a supplement in which case you'd just ask. Always draw labs before replacing when you're doing replacements for Iron, Folate, B12, etc. Unless you have to give blood urgently, there's no reason to give any of these urgently and if you check it after, you run into a diagnostic dilemma of whether they are deficient or not.For a theoretical patient, what would you make of a folate level >44?