Your problems are really small
1. Breaking duty hours? I think you need to think about this comment before discussing it further.
2. Procedures? generally irrelevant in the eyes of the PD unless you actually want to do an ICU fellowship
3. On Rounds: Only your assessment and plans show how smart you are anyways, so formulate it the day before. Dont waste time presenting useless history and physical or labs. If you want to sound smart, present your plan first, and when the attending questions why, then you bring up pertinent history physical and labs.
I respectively disagree with your post.
1. Breaking duty hours - we've all done it as residents (and not just in the MICU). Medicine isn't a clock in, clock out profession. And beginning interns are really inefficient so will take longer to do stuff that a May/June intern. And except outside NY, it's not a law (and 80 hrs can be averaged over 4 weeks). We should try to abide by the rules, but to not talk about it (or admit that we break them) only encourages new trainees to feel guilty (or think they're alone in doing this).
2. Procedures - don't worry about it at this point. There's enough on your plate and you'll get enough practice/shots as time flies. And depending on your career goal (Pulm/CCM, GI, Cards, Heme/Onc, Rheum, Hospitalist), you may not be doing procedures in your career. Some seniors/fellows/attendings are better at teaching procedures than others. You just need the right "teacher". (and some patient are more difficult to do procedures than others)
3. This is the ICU - you can't formulate a plan the day before. Your plan will likely change in the afternoon compare to the morning when new data are known (and you see patient's response to intervention). You're dealing with multi-systems involvement with acute physiologic changes in unstable patients (who most likely also have chronic medical issues).
And if you present your plan first to me on rounds before going over subjective/objective/physical assessment, as you suggested, I will pull you aside and ask that you work on organizing your thoughts and presenting skills. I want to know if you know what's going on with the patient, if you know the relevant data on the patient, the relevant physical exam, that you've seen the imaging studies (not just the report but actually LOOK at the imaging studies) and that based on the above, you've formulated a reasonable plan that you synthesized based on current information.
I'm sure you can identify with this . . .
I got to the ICU on Tuesday this week only to be called almost in a panic by one of my cardiology colleagues about a patient that was crumping and fast. The guy had a sick, sick heart, but my homie had decided this "CLEARLY" (heh) wasn't the man's problem and he probably needed my services and fast. I'm taking a quick look at the guy and his JACKED up labs and his JACKED up vital signs and his JACKED up poor old guy "I'm trying to die here face" and I'm thinking . . .
Yeah, throw the kitchen sink at the patient ... and if he lives, take credit. If he doesn't, well, you tried everything (and then some). And we do this while trying to convince heme/onc that telling the family that "maybe one more round of chemotherapy might help" might not be appropriate for someone in multisystem organ failure