I think the main point of the article though was that patient care IS being compromised, because of how widespread this practice is and how difficult it actually is to get an appointment as a result. The stuff about different waiting rooms, etc, is all fluff that is meant to attract readers.
It is my (and many others) belief that far too many people have been inappropriately dramatic regarding this. Several points to be made here:
The best conducted study (although there have been several, mostly with comparable results) on appointment wait time differences between specialties across many cities was performed by Merritt Hawkins a couple of years ago (and is still available on their website). Dermatology did not have significantly longer wait times compared to other specialties.
The "dermatology workforce shortage" was perpetuated by *possibly* well meaning academic dermatologists, many of whom have some conflicts of interests which were not adequately disclosed prior to, during, or after their comments on the matter. If you follow the issue within the specialty you will find that this matter has fallen by the wayside for good reason.
Several forces play into this "shortage", but it has been shown time and again that the advent of cosmetic dermatology is a very minor factor, with hours worked and patient volume serviced by far and away being the major contributing factor.
I don't know if anyone read through some of the comments posted by the readers, but you have to look no further to see why the practice of medicine is trouble currently (and, in all likelihood, headed for darker times). When an ever increasing swath of the population believes that you should be available to serve them, at their beck and call, in short order, and do so for less than the cost of dinner at a low cost chain restaurant -- you know that we've fallen from societal graces.