Duke rejection, really upset

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Med01

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I got an interview from Duke a couple of years ago, but never followed up with any interest letters after interview. Was hoping for another shot as more-motivated candidate...guess no.
 
Med01 said:
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I got an interview from Duke a couple of years ago, but never followed up with any interest letters after interview. Was hoping for another shot as more-motivated candidate...guess no.

And to find this online instead of through a letter seems worse.
 
I just got my rejection online too. They probably are going to send in a letter rejection as well. Sorry to see it brought you down. Best wishes homie...
 
Trust me, you didn't want to go to Duke anyway. Their curriculum is poorly designed and the tuition is way too high for what you get.

Hope that you get plenty of other interviews at other good schools. Good luck.
 
I just checked and I got the same rejection. It is not that Duke was my first choice - but rejection always hurts. Especially when you feel so desperate. 🙁
 
I got nervous after seeing this and checked mine, but still the same thing "my application is under review" Do you think they're really reviewing it or just waiting a respectable amount of time before sending me the rejection letter?
 
I'm sorry guys 🙁

Good luck with your other choices :luck:
 
mashce said:
I got nervous after seeing this and checked mine, but still the same thing "my application is under review" Do you think they're really reviewing it or just waiting a respectable amount of time before sending me the rejection letter?

That whole thing about 'we try to get back in 2-3 weeks' really is un-necessary. I mean why even suggest that if its going to be almost 3 months before they get back to you....


http://mdapplicants.com/viewprofile.php?myid=4509
 
kaffy said:
I had that "2-3 weeks" thing for months - then: rejection

I'm glad you posted that. I thought they were actually serious about the 2-3 wks thing and was looking forward to hearing from them soon. Foolish me....
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
mashce said:
I'm glad you posted that. I thought they were actually serious about the 2-3 wks thing and was looking forward to hearing from them soon. Foolish me....

I'm starting to see a trend in my status at all these schools. Everyone is telling me I am on "hold", and it will be a few weeks, then totally forgets about me...
 
Sorry to hear that, everyone. I too, have been waiting for my 2-3 weeks... for over 2 months. It still says "Screening in progress" now, though, I wonder when it changes?

Best of luck with ALL of your other schools! The longer they take, the less excited I am.
 
DeadorAlive said:
Sorry to hear that, everyone. I too, have been waiting for my 2-3 weeks... for over 2 months. It still says "Screening in progress" now, though, I wonder when it changes?

Best of luck with ALL of your other schools! The longer they take, the less excited I am.

Exactly. The longer it takes the less happy and more relieved I will be to get an acceptance
 
Med01 said:
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I got an interview from Duke a couple of years ago, but never followed up with any interest letters after interview. Was hoping for another shot as more-motivated candidate...guess no.

i went there for undergrad. trust me you deserve better than durham. i hope you get into a kickass school!!!! :luck:
 
Fuggedaboutit.

You'll get into places you will like better. You'll look at this moment years down the road and laugh that you got so disappointed by this.

Good luck!
 
Med01 said:
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I just submitted my Duke secondary today....can someone tell me what's the site for status check online....also did you guys get the rejections before an interview????????? I am getting really freaked out, since i feel i am already late in submitting my secondary........when did you guys submit your secondaries??????
 
Why is everyone Duke-bashing? I think the school is amazing and that the condensed science curriculum that allows student the chance to do an entire year of research is a great! Durham I've heard is a bit boring, but I'd prefer that to Baltimore or NYC where I'd be afraid to go out alone at night...

Duke is definitely one of my top choices, despite their AWFUL secondary and annoying alpha/beta interview style.
 
unicorn06 said:
Why is everyone Duke-bashing? I think the school is amazing and that the condensed science curriculum that allows student the chance to do an entire year of research is a great! Durham I've heard is a bit boring, but I'd prefer that to Baltimore or NYC where I'd be afraid to go out alone at night...

Duke is definitely one of my top choices, despite their AWFUL secondary and annoying alpha/beta interview style.
Haha sorry I had to reply to this...I went there for undergrad and believe me, Durham is FAR worse than NYC for "going out alone at night." In NYC you have a ton of people out at all times of the night; the crime rate for such a highly populated city is pretty low if you think about it. Durham, on the other hand, was the murder capital of the nation a few years ago (per capita). There are definitely some nice parts of Durham, but don't go near East Durham or you might get shot. Even Duke's campus isn't immune to crime (but I seriously doubt any school completely is). Durham isn't unsafe if you're smart about it, but I wouldn't recommend going out alone at night. The good news is you do get to see some pretty interesting stuff during your ED shifts at Duke.

But as a whole, Durham isn't that bad. and nothing compares to Duke basketball. Chicagomel, when did you graduate?

Also, in response to the "high tuition" that someone posted about earlier, check out the MSAR. What other top private school has an average student indebtedness less than most state schools??
 
Cardiologist said:
Med01 said:
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I just submitted my Duke secondary today....can someone tell me what's the site for status check online....also did you guys get the rejections before an interview????????? I am getting really freaked out, since i feel i am already late in submitting my secondary........when did you guys submit your secondaries??????

I was complete 8/25...
 
MrBurns10 said:
Haha sorry I had to reply to this...I went there for undergrad and believe me, Durham is FAR worse than NYC for "going out alone at night." In NYC you have a ton of people out at all times of the night; the crime rate for such a highly populated city is pretty low if you think about it. Durham, on the other hand, was the murder capital of the nation a few years ago (per capita). There are definitely some nice parts of Durham, but don't go near East Durham or you might get shot. Even Duke's campus isn't immune to crime (but I seriously doubt any school completely is). Durham isn't unsafe if you're smart about it, but I wouldn't recommend going out alone at night. The good news is that if you ever do ED shifts at Durham Regional you do get to see some pretty interesting stuff.

But as a whole, Durham isn't that bad. and nothing compares to Duke basketball. Chicagomel, when did you graduate?

Also, in response to the "high tuition" that someone posted about earlier, check out the MSAR. What other top private school has an average student indebtedness less than most state schools??

I hadn't been to Durham, as I did a regional interview when granted one a few years ago. Didn't know about the crime. that would be a negative.

One of my friends went to Duke med, and I thought that was a good sign...of people who had interesting experiences but were also friendly and down to earth (at least my friend was). Being with people I like and get along with is v. important for me in choosing a school/ company to work in.

well, thank you all for your empathy.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Well I don't want to give anyone a completely inaccurate picture of Durham...like any other city it has its good parts and its bad parts. The area around Duke isn't bad and students are fine if they are smart about things and don't go wandering about by themselves at 2am.

But don't worry about it, Med01...there are plenty of great places out there and one is going to be perfect for you 🙂. Best of luck to you.
 
Nothing compares to Duke basketball like . . um. . UNC basketball? *cough*

:laugh:
 
seilienne said:
Nothing compares to Duke basketball like . . um. . UNC basketball? *cough*

:laugh:
Haha, not after they go 5-25 this year! What I meant was nothing is like the Cameron Indoor environment, and I think that's a pretty safe statement.

But if you prefer...nothing like the Duke-UNC rivalry 🙂
 
Hawk22 said:
Trust me, you didn't want to go to Duke anyway. Their curriculum is poorly designed and the tuition is way too high for what you get.

Hope that you get plenty of other interviews at other good schools. Good luck.


Even though I did submit my secondary to Duke, I am pretty sure I will get a rejection. But Duke's tuition is not high at all - compared to other private schools or other public school's Out of State tuition. I think Duke's tuition is around 34K..compare that to U of Vermont's 42K or Albany's 40K. And I don't think there is any comparison between Albany and Duke.

I live in Durham..I think depending on where in Durham you live..it can be a pretty good place. Definitely not as exiciting as NYC of course.
 
I'm surprised to hear about Durham's high crime rate. I've never been there, but I was under the impression that it was a small and pretty quiet city. I'd heard criticisms of how boring it was but nothing regarding safety. Is there anywhere I can get more info about this issue?
 
unicorn06 said:
I'm surprised to hear about Durham's high crime rate. I've never been there, but I was under the impression that it was a small and pretty quiet city. I'd heard criticisms of how boring it was but nothing regarding safety. Is there anywhere I can get more info about this issue?

For anyone who is interested, I'll answer my own question. I looked up crime stats on CityRating.com because this thread worried me. Apparently Durham has a per capita violent crime rate of 1.44 times the national average (murder=1.45 times). This relieves my fears. For comparisson's sake, Baltimore has a per capita violent crime rate of 2.90 times the national average (murder=5.48 times). Durham doesn't seem to bad at all....

Some better news for those of you who applied to Michigan and Stanford: the per cap violent crime rate for Palo Alto is .25 times nat'l avg and Ann Arbor is .47.
 
All this crime talk is overrated. Sure, one or two assaults occur on campus in a year, but the vast majority of crime in Durham occurs in neighborhoods where medical students would not ordinarily live or even enter. (I am not saying this is OK, only saying that it shouldn't really be a factor in deciding where to go to med school). The majority of the city is nice, quiet, and quasi-interesting. As someone mentioned, as long as you are smart about things, you will never have any troubles with the crime. This is in sharp contrast to, say Hopkins, where bodyguards walk physicians from the hospital to their cars in the parking lot.

Don't let naive comments about crimerates prevent you from considering Duke Med altogether.
 
Let me clarify my post about their curriculum.

In undergrad before medical school, I worked for one of the doctors that helped design one of their primary first year classes. He worked there for several years and taught the course, but left to take another position at my school. He said that their first year accelerated curriculum was crazy and he didn't feel that the students were very well prepared because things were too condensed. The third year for research is nice, but he said you're basically PAYING THEM $34,000 a year to work for someone and that it made much more sense to use that time to get a MBA/MPH or other degree. In the end, Duke students do well because they attract some of the best students in the country, but that those people would do well anywhere (i.e. they would do well no matter how bad the curriculum is).

In the end, he said that Duke was the ONLY place that he wouldn't give me a letter of recommendation and actively discouraged me from applying there.

Multiple residents (I can think of at least 6) from Duke have also commented that students don't seem as well prepared for the wards as students from school with more traditional curriculums.

In the end, Durham isn't that bad. Just pick one of the nicer parts of town (around Duke's campus or on the southeast side of the county around Southpoint Mall).

Good luck to you all.
 
unicorn06 said:
For anyone who is interested, I'll answer my own question. I looked up crime stats on CityRating.com because this thread worried me. Apparently Durham has a per capita violent crime rate of 1.44 times the national average (murder=1.45 times). This relieves my fears. For comparisson's sake, Baltimore has a per capita violent crime rate of 2.90 times the national average (murder=5.48 times). Durham doesn't seem to bad at all....

Some better news for those of you who applied to Michigan and Stanford: the per cap violent crime rate for Palo Alto is .25 times nat'l avg and Ann Arbor is .47.

you neglected to mention NYC's violent crime rate, that's 1.23 times the nat'l average. i believe that's better than durham, whoops.....
 
medhacker said:
I just got my rejection online too. They probably are going to send in a letter rejection as well. Sorry to see it brought you down. Best wishes homie...

I applied there last year. No letter is coming.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
i checked today - still "under review". i was complete in august.
 
Hawk22 said:
The third year for research is nice, but he said you're basically PAYING THEM $34,000 a year to work for someone and that it made much more sense to use that time to get a MBA/MPH or other degree.

Isn't the big claim from Duke that something like 40% of graduates are dual degree (MBA, MS, MPH), meaning they do take advantage of that year?
 
MrBurns10 said:
Haha sorry I had to reply to this...I went there for undergrad and believe me, Durham is FAR worse than NYC for "going out alone at night." In NYC you have a ton of people out at all times of the night; the crime rate for such a highly populated city is pretty low if you think about it. Durham, on the other hand, was the murder capital of the nation a few years ago (per capita). There are definitely some nice parts of Durham, but don't go near East Durham or you might get shot. Even Duke's campus isn't immune to crime (but I seriously doubt any school completely is). Durham isn't unsafe if you're smart about it, but I wouldn't recommend going out alone at night. The good news is you do get to see some pretty interesting stuff during your ED shifts at Duke.

But as a whole, Durham isn't that bad. and nothing compares to Duke basketball. Chicagomel, when did you graduate?

Also, in response to the "high tuition" that someone posted about earlier, check out the MSAR. What other top private school has an average student indebtedness less than most state schools??

Trinity '99 😀

yeah, i've got to agree with you...ninth street shuts down at 9pm, so walking around there by yourself is a definite no no. i've got to say, though, the cosmic cantina was worth the risk when you had the drunk munchies... 😉
 
Hawk22 said:
Let me clarify my post about their curriculum.

In undergrad before medical school, I worked for one of the doctors that helped design one of their primary first year classes. He worked there for several years and taught the course, but left to take another position at my school. He said that their first year accelerated curriculum was crazy and he didn't feel that the students were very well prepared because things were too condensed. The third year for research is nice, but he said you're basically PAYING THEM $34,000 a year to work for someone and that it made much more sense to use that time to get a MBA/MPH or other degree. In the end, Duke students do well because they attract some of the best students in the country, but that those people would do well anywhere (i.e. they would do well no matter how bad the curriculum is).

In the end, he said that Duke was the ONLY place that he wouldn't give me a letter of recommendation and actively discouraged me from applying there.

Multiple residents (I can think of at least 6) from Duke have also commented that students don't seem as well prepared for the wards as students from school with more traditional curriculums.

In the end, Durham isn't that bad. Just pick one of the nicer parts of town (around Duke's campus or on the southeast side of the county around Southpoint Mall).

Good luck to you all.

Wait, I thought Duke was a little cheaper than most private medical schools, because of that 3rd year. I don't see how you would pay Duke (well, definitley not $34,000) during the third year, unless you are doing one of the combined degree programs. I am not defending Duke. I just wanted clarification on 3rd year costs.
 
:: pulls out Financial Aid handout:: The way the 3rd year works (I think) is that you do still pay your tuition, which is $34,842. There're some other fees for insurance and other extras and such added on as well, bringing the total (not counting living expenses) to $40,634.
Then, what happens is, most of the time people either a) get a 2nd degree, in which case this is pretty much just the same as any other year, or b) do a research thing. If b), things get a little kooky. If you do an NIH or CDC thing, (as I was led to believe) they cover your tuition AND you get a stipend of like $20k or something to live on. If you do research on campus, unless you get a scholarship (of which there are a TON), you're still responsible for the tuition. Most people (they say) get scholarships or a 2nd degree or do an NIH or CDC thing, so basically the only way you'll end up PAYING to be someone's lab lackey is if you don't do a 2nd degree, don't get a scholarship, and don't do an NIH/CDC/etc type thing.

Hope that clarifies things - keep in mind, I'm just an applicant, so I don't really know this any better than you guys. :wink:
 
seilienne said:
:: pulls out Financial Aid handout:: The way the 3rd year works (I think) is that you do still pay your tuition, which is $34,842. There're some other fees for insurance and other extras and such added on as well, bringing the total (not counting living expenses) to $40,634.
Then, what happens is, most of the time people either a) get a 2nd degree, in which case this is pretty much just the same as any other year, or b) do a research thing. If b), things get a little kooky. If you do an NIH or CDC thing, (as I was led to believe) they cover your tuition AND you get a stipend of like $20k or something to live on. If you do research on campus, unless you get a scholarship (of which there are a TON), you're still responsible for the tuition. Most people (they say) get scholarships or a 2nd degree or do an NIH or CDC thing, so basically the only way you'll end up PAYING to be someone's lab lackey is if you don't do a 2nd degree, don't get a scholarship, and don't do an NIH/CDC/etc type thing.

Hope that clarifies things - keep in mind, I'm just an applicant, so I don't really know this any better than you guys. :wink:

Thanks for the clarification.
 
unicorn06 said:
Why is everyone Duke-bashing? I think the school is amazing and that the condensed science curriculum that allows student the chance to do an entire year of research is a great! Durham I've heard is a bit boring, but I'd prefer that to Baltimore or NYC where I'd be afraid to go out alone at night...

Duke is definitely one of my top choices, despite their AWFUL secondary and annoying alpha/beta interview style.

This is funny, because I went to UNC for undergrad and had some friends at Duke. Durham is perhaps one of the most rundown and yes, dangerous cities in the country, far worse than the vast majority of areas in NYC. Like many places, there are good parts and bad parts to Durham. But I have never met someone who is a "fan of Durham" if that tells you anything, even if they loved Duke. Not only is it perhaps the most boring city I have ever been to in my entire life (put it this way, there are not even any street lights on the major thoroughfares), but I would without question rather walk around by myself alone at night in NYC than in Durham, where you will probably be spotted right away because you'll be the only person walking, LOL (you absolutely need a car to get anywhere).

The surrounding area has a lot of trees and it is very cheap to live there though, and you could always spend your Friday nights in Chapel Hill. 🙂
 
Med01 said:
All set to write a letter of interest to Duke, and logged onto status page, only to see a message saying they won't consider application any further, and cannot invite you to interview. Some schools I didn't care about the rejection letter, but this I had hopes for and had a hard time sleeping that night.

I got an interview from Duke a couple of years ago, but never followed up with any interest letters after interview. Was hoping for another shot as more-motivated candidate...guess no.


Their average MCAT for accepted students was a 37....this is according to the director of admissions who spoke to a group here at Penn
 
SDN JEOPARDY

MEDICAL SCHOOLS FOR 500 please

riceman04 said:
Their average MCAT for accepted students was a 37....this is according to the director of admissions who spoke to a group here at Penn

Participant: hmmm what is a number ho?

Correccto Mundo!!!!!


applause.jpg
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hawk22 said:
Let me clarify my post about their curriculum.

In undergrad before medical school, I worked for one of the doctors that helped design one of their primary first year classes. He worked there for several years and taught the course, but left to take another position at my school. He said that their first year accelerated curriculum was crazy and he didn't feel that the students were very well prepared because things were too condensed. The third year for research is nice, but he said you're basically PAYING THEM $34,000 a year to work for someone and that it made much more sense to use that time to get a MBA/MPH or other degree. In the end, Duke students do well because they attract some of the best students in the country, but that those people would do well anywhere (i.e. they would do well no matter how bad the curriculum is).

In the end, he said that Duke was the ONLY place that he wouldn't give me a letter of recommendation and actively discouraged me from applying there.

Multiple residents (I can think of at least 6) from Duke have also commented that students don't seem as well prepared for the wards as students from school with more traditional curriculums.

In the end, Durham isn't that bad. Just pick one of the nicer parts of town (around Duke's campus or on the southeast side of the county around Southpoint Mall).

Good luck to you all.

While I respect that everyone is entitled to their opinion, having been through most of the Duke curriculum now I find it very difficult to defend the position of the doctor you worked with. Just look at Duke's match list and you'll see that top residency programs consistently seek out Duke students, and it's not just because we're supposed to be "smart." Being intelligent doesn't translate into being a good physician; you can train bright people very poorly and end up with very poor doctors, so the fact that Duke graduates are sought-after speaks volumes about the quality of our training. Granted, we obviously know less when we start on the wards as 2nd years as compared to students at other schools who start on the wards as 3rd years, but such a comparison isn't fair and is thus useless. The important factor is where we end up, and this is where the match list is quite telling. Indeed, I'd argue that in the end we benefit from this earlier clinical exposure and ultimately develop a better integration of basic science and clinical knowledge, making us excellent physicians. Plus, our board scores are reportedly the second highest in the country, so I doubt that our abbreviated basic science curriculum is worthy of being called "crazy," especially since it's worked well for literally decades.

Also, most students aren't really "PAYING THEM," as you say, to do 3rd year research, as a good 40% of us get another degree without additional cost, and a large percentage of the rest win large scholarships like those from the NIH, in addition to a number of internal Duke scholarships, many of which are in excess of $20,000.

As for the "number *****" thing, I know for a fact that some of my classmates and other Duke students have MCAT scores in the 20's. While the average may be impressively high, trust that Duke is perhaps THE most diverse medical school in the country, both ethnically and with regards to academic opportunity/background. I know many students who have served on the admissions committee, and can assure you that numbers are hardly the focus of the selection process (although it often makes people feel better to label us "number ******").

It sounds to me like the professor you worked with had a serious chip on his/her shoulder, or a bone to pick with Duke (I wonder if it has something to do with why he/she left, perhaps not having been given a promotion, or something of that sort?). I give you the benefit of the doubt, but must also assure you and other readers that most people here and elsewhere would dispute his/her assertions about Duke and the quality of education it provides.

I agree though that Durham isn't a bad place to live. Many of us, myself included, actually LOVE living in this area, counter to what is often presumed. It's absurdly affordable, which is a much more valuable trait than I anticipated when I was starting medical school. Anyone who says there's nothing to do here just hasn't made the effort (and it doesn't take much).

And so ends my rant for the day! 😉
 
TommyGunn04 said:
As for the "number *****" thing, I know for a fact that some of my classmates and other Duke students have MCAT scores in the 20's.


What kind of twenties? low, mid, high?

Thanks
 
Hawk22 said:
Let me clarify my post about their curriculum....

Actually, I've heard the same thing from doctors and nurses I've worked with. I've been told that the accelerated sciences in one year cuts a few corners, since obviously you can't teach the same amount of material in half the time. Plus, the 3rd year off really cuts into the clinical skills, and I've been told that (in general), Duke residents are not as good as say, UNC residents.

Not that I'm not going to apply there, since obviously it's a great school. I think it's just geared a little more towards research than producing great clinicians, if that's what you want.
 
WholeLottaGame7 said:
Actually, I've heard the same thing from doctors and nurses I've worked with. I've been told that the accelerated sciences in one year cuts a few corners, since obviously you can't teach the same amount of material in half the time. Plus, the 3rd year off really cuts into the clinical skills, and I've been told that (in general), Duke residents are not as good as say, UNC residents.

Not that I'm not going to apply there, since obviously it's a great school. I think it's just geared a little more towards research than producing great clinicians, if that's what you want.

Considering that Duke is ranked 6th in primary care, I think you are splitting some nanometer sized hairs.

fiddler
 
fiddler said:
Considering that Duke is ranked 6th in primary care, I think you are splitting some nanometer sized hairs.

fiddler

Actually, these weren't primary care residents. Various surgical specialties and anesthesiology, mostly, since I'm getting my info out of the OR.
 
medhacker said:
What kind of twenties? low, mid, high?

Thanks

Low to mid twenties. I vaguely recall hearing of a 21 or 25...something like that, but definitely some in the high twenties as well.

WholeLottaGame7 said:
Actually, I've heard the same thing from doctors and nurses I've worked with. I've been told that the accelerated sciences in one year cuts a few corners, since obviously you can't teach the same amount of material in half the time. Plus, the 3rd year off really cuts into the clinical skills, and I've been told that (in general), Duke residents are not as good as say, UNC residents.

Not that I'm not going to apply there, since obviously it's a great school. I think it's just geared a little more towards research than producing great clinicians, if that's what you want.

As I tried to argue earlier, I think this is an unfair comparison in a sense, as it seems to presume, either intentionally or perhaps even subconsciously, that a 2nd year Duke student on the wards should have the same knowledge base as a 3rd year student elsewhere. This is what these doctors and nurses you mentioned are tacitly assuming when they compare a Duke student to "other students." Furthermore, the fact that you can't teach the same amount of material in one year is irrelevant unless you can demonstrate that the material that isn't taught actually makes a difference in how good of a physician one becomes. The fact is, a great deal of the material taught didactically in med school has NO practical relevance to medicine as it's actually practiced; the rest seems to be equalized within a few months of being on the wards, as it's learned through experience much more quickly than it could be learned didactically. In any case, when you couple this realization with the fact that the Duke first year is actually longer than most (about 11 months) and has many longer days, and you end up realizing that it's more than just "half the material" that's covered. And again, if we're averaging 2nd in the country on the boards I have to question your assumption that one year isn't enough, and that we're somehow missing out or are "behind" other students.

In any case, I've found that, having lived through the curriculum, by the beginning/middle of the 4th year Duke students generally perform at an extremely high level clinically, at around the level of a medicine intern at Duke, which says quite a bit given how renowned Duke's Internal Medicine Program is. But don't take my word for it, just ask a Duke resident who's had one of us as their sub-I and has benefited greatly by all the work we take off their shoulders. Furthermore, to suggest that Duke residents are sub-par to UNC residents is just laughable. That's just a ridiculously unfounded assertion that few people would support. I'm not trying to be contrary or argumentative, I just don't think what you've said really holds water, nor do I think it's an opinion that many people actually hold.

Finally, having been through most of the curriculum now I hardly feel that I've been trained to be a researcher rather than a clinician, as you suggest. Quite to the contrary, the clinical training here is superb, and most of us feel VERY prepared for internship. It seems that program directors feel the same; check out the match list. I just don't see how anyone can argue that we're ill-prepared given these facts. The top programs simply would NOT continue to recruit and match Duke graduates if we weren't superbly trained.
 
well, clearly not because somebody's brother's uncle who works at a hopsital says that Duke residents and clinical rotations as MS's suck!!!

fiddler

TommyGunn04 said:
Low to mid twenties. I vaguely recall hearing of a 21 or 25...something like that, but definitely some in the high twenties as well.



As I tried to argue earlier, I think this is an unfair comparison in a sense, as it seems to presume, either intentionally or perhaps even subconsciously, that a 2nd year Duke student on the wards should have the same knowledge base as a 3rd year student elsewhere. This is what these doctors and nurses you mentioned are tacitly assuming when they compare a Duke student to "other students." Furthermore, the fact that you can't teach the same amount of material in one year is irrelevant unless you can demonstrate that the material that isn't taught actually makes a difference in how good of a physician one becomes. The fact is, a great deal of the material taught didactically in med school has NO practical relevance to medicine as it's actually practiced; the rest seems to be equalized within a few months of being on the wards, as it's learned through experience much more quickly than it could be learned didactically. In any case, when you couple this realization with the fact that the Duke first year is actually longer than most (about 11 months) and has many longer days, and you end up realizing that it's more than just "half the material" that's covered. And again, if we're averaging 2nd in the country on the boards I have to question your assumption that one year isn't enough, and that we're somehow missing out or are "behind" other students.

In any case, I've found that, having lived through the curriculum, by the beginning/middle of the 4th year Duke students generally perform at an extremely high level clinically, at around the level of a medicine intern at Duke, which says quite a bit given how renowned Duke's Internal Medicine Program is. But don't take my word for it, just ask a Duke resident who's had one of us as their sub-I and has benefited greatly by all the work we take off their shoulders. Furthermore, to suggest that Duke residents are sub-par to UNC residents is just laughable. That's just a ridiculously unfounded assertion that few people would support. I'm not trying to be contrary or argumentative, I just don't think what you've said really holds water, nor do I think it's an opinion that many people actually hold.

Finally, having been through most of the curriculum now I hardly feel that I've been trained to be a researcher rather than a clinician, as you suggest. Quite to the contrary, the clinical training here is superb, and most of us feel VERY prepared for internship. It seems that program directors feel the same; check out the match list. I just don't see how anyone can argue that we're ill-prepared given these facts. The top programs simply would NOT continue to recruit and match Duke graduates if we weren't superbly trained.
 
fiddler said:
well, clearly not because somebody's brother's uncle who works at a hopsital says that Duke residents and clinical rotations as MS's suck!!!

fiddler

:laugh:
 
fiddler said:
well, clearly not because somebody's brother's uncle who works at a hopsital says that Duke residents and clinical rotations as MS's suck!!!

fiddler

Yes, this is exactly what I said. Good call. I bow to the wisdom your off-topic sarcasm brings to the debate.

I'm not saying Duke students don't do fantastic on their boards, they obviously do. I'm not saying Duke students don't place extremely well into residencies, because they do. And it's a top-10 school for a reason.

I'm just saying that for a school that is ranked top-10 in both research and primary care, I hear an unusual number of negative (or not positive) reports about clinical skills, from RNs, residents themselves, and attendings. Again, this is in reference to OR specialties: surgery, anesthesiology, etc, I can't speak for others.

Relax, I'm not attacking your integrity as a med student, I'm just bringing up valid observations by fellow professionals about the effects of the curriculum. It's not like I'm getting my opinions from hobos down in the railroad yard in exchange for a couple 40s. Go watch a game in Cameron, maybe it'll chill you out.
 
This debate is just like all the other debates about all the other top 10 schools. Harvard students have bad clinical skills, Yale students have too much freedom and don't do well on their boards, etc, etc. In reality, there are people that don't do well at every medical school in the country for whatever reason. People just like to bash the ones at the top because it makes them feel better about themselves. However, the fact still remains that the top schools have the top match lists and if I wanted to specialize in something, I would probably choose a top school (given the option, of course).
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Top Bottom