Early diastolic filling in Constrictive Pericarditis

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ChessMaster3000

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
866
Reaction score
295
As I understand it, there is a prominent y descent in CP because of early diastolic filling. However, there is not a prominent y in tamponade, presumably because there is not diastolic filling? If so, where is there early filling in CP but not cardiac tamponade? Finally, is this related to why there isn't a Kussmaul sound in tamponade? (I've read a lot of conflicting information about the Kussmaul sign)

Thanks in advance!

Members don't see this ad.
 
As I understand it, there is a prominent y descent in CP because of early diastolic filling. However, there is not a prominent y in tamponade, presumably because there is not diastolic filling? If so, where is there early filling in CP but not cardiac tamponade? Finally, is this related to why there isn't a Kussmaul sound in tamponade? (I've read a lot of conflicting information about the Kussmaul sign)

Thanks in advance!
do you mean kussmaul sign? or perhaps kussmaul breathing of DKA? There are no kussmaul sounds- I see that is a typo but its important to keep things straight as there are two separate kussmauls :)

Furthermore your question is most certainly beyond the scope of the USMLE- but there are a few important learning points to make.

First- constrictive pericarditis is a result of fibrosis and hardening of the pericardium. This prevents any respiratory influence unlike that seen in tampoande. Importantly, the effects of blood entry into the right V will not have the same impact on the left V- that is, pulsus paradoxus is not to be expected in CP- this is because the heart is able to expand to teh size of the pericardium without th eneed to shift blood into the IV septum as seen in tamponade.

Finally, even though respirations effects are not there on the heart in CP speifically inspiration- there is effect in the pulmonary veins because they are outside teh pericardium. As a result the pulm veins expand and draw blood into the heart- this drawing of blood leads to the increase in early diastolic volume that you see- and the resulting decline in y- I hope you understand why the y declines - because it is jugular venous pressure- thus more blood enters the right heart - so the y drops during EARLY diastolic filling. To clarify- what I mean is this- blood travels even more from the veins into the RA- thus blood from the jugular vein for example will be leaving faster- leading to the greater 'y' decline- and an increased RA increase (increased early diastolic filling)

Why is there a distinction bw early and late? because early is about passive filling due to the just opened ventricles- this draws blood through the atria. Late diastolic filling is due to the contraction of the atria.

Anyway- in tamponade there is fluid pushing down on the percardium and preventing expansion of any sort- thus blood is compressed from enterinjg the heart as much- however, during inspiration there is a decrease in venous pressure drawing blood in- the compressed heart (which cannot even enlarge to the size of the pericardium) pushes blood into the IV septum causing pressure drop in LV- this leads to some backflow and pushes blood back into the RA- and the resulting increase in pressure is seen as a kussmaul sign and increased JVD
 
do you mean kussmaul sign? or perhaps kussmaul breathing of DKA? There are no kussmaul sounds- I see that is a typo but its important to keep things straight as there are two separate kussmauls :)

Furthermore your question is most certainly beyond the scope of the USMLE- but there are a few important learning points to make.

First- constrictive pericarditis is a result of fibrosis and hardening of the pericardium. This prevents any respiratory influence unlike that seen in tampoande. Importantly, the effects of blood entry into the right V will not have the same impact on the left V- that is, pulsus paradoxus is not to be expected in CP- this is because the heart is able to expand to teh size of the pericardium without th eneed to shift blood into the IV septum as seen in tamponade.

Finally, even though respirations effects are not there on the heart in CP speifically inspiration- there is effect in the pulmonary veins because they are outside teh pericardium. As a result the pulm veins expand and draw blood into the heart- this drawing of blood leads to the increase in early diastolic volume that you see- and the resulting decline in y- I hope you understand why the y declines - because it is jugular venous pressure- thus more blood enters the right heart - so the y drops during EARLY diastolic filling. To clarify- what I mean is this- blood travels even more from the veins into the RA- thus blood from the jugular vein for example will be leaving faster- leading to the greater 'y' decline- and an increased RA increase (increased early diastolic filling)

Why is there a distinction bw early and late? because early is about passive filling due to the just opened ventricles- this draws blood through the atria. Late diastolic filling is due to the contraction of the atria.

Anyway- in tamponade there is fluid pushing down on the percardium and preventing expansion of any sort- thus blood is compressed from enterinjg the heart as much- however, during inspiration there is a decrease in venous pressure drawing blood in- the compressed heart (which cannot even enlarge to the size of the pericardium) pushes blood into the IV septum causing pressure drop in LV- this leads to some backflow and pushes blood back into the RA- and the resulting increase in pressure is seen as a kussmaul sign and increased JVD

Hey sanj, thanks for taking the time to write this. However I'm a little confused because I am fairly sure I read that kussmauls sign is seen in CP and not as often in tamponade, which seems to be the opposite of what youre saying. I also believe that you can see paradoxus in tamponade. I do understand why the y declines.
 
Hey sanj, thanks for taking the time to write this. However I'm a little confused because I am fairly sure I read that kussmauls sign is seen in CP and not as often in tamponade, which seems to be the opposite of what youre saying. I also believe that you can see paradoxus in tamponade. I do understand why the y declines.

Yeah the kussmaul sign is there- but reduced in inspiration which is what I was trying to say- I'm too lazy to edit but I would add the following- kussmaul is present but less so during inspiration when blood is drawn into the heart.

I'm uncomfortable with not associaating kussmaul and tamponade. It may be rare but for USMLE its there- I mean if they dont mention it it doesnt mean its Not tamponade. but if they do I wouldnt exclude it either.

I would focus on the other differences- which I wont elaborate because I myself need to rereview
 
Hey sanj, thanks for taking the time to write this. However I'm a little confused because I am fairly sure I read that kussmauls sign is seen in CP and not as often in tamponade, which seems to be the opposite of what youre saying. I also believe that you can see paradoxus in tamponade. I do understand why the y declines.

also- I dont intend to write in a condescending tone. Just a way for me to write it all out for myself since I havent done CV in over a month :(
 
Top