Eas with 2 ACTIVATING rings

Started by 510586
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

510586

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I know that was reactions with 2 rings only add to one side like this oneone , but what if they are both activating instead of one act one deact
1435870238072798476345.jpg
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
what was the answer?
Oh sorry. Yea B was the answer. The explanation said one ring would be activating and one deactivating so i asked if both were deactivating. Also if there are 2 electron withdrawing groups on one benzene ring, the stronger EWG would dictate correct? Like cooh would direct not Cl for example on one benzene ring.
 
Why can't the answer be A or E?
The C=O is EWG....given. It's a meta director. Given. Shouldn't it brominate on the meta position on the ring closest to the C=O? This isn't a FC reaction where deactivated rings can't get more substituents...

And the Br on the ring closest to the NH director should be on O and P positions.
 
Why can't the answer be A or E?
The C=O is EWG....given. It's a meta director. Given. Shouldn't it brominate on the meta position on the ring closest to the C=O? This isn't a FC reaction where deactivated rings can't get more substituents...

And the Br on the ring closest to the NH director should be on O and P positions.

You are only adding 1 equivalent of Br. A and E have too many Br groups added.
 
I don't think so. After you add 1 Bromine to the right group, it makes the positions meta to the Bromine less reactive because Bromine (although a deactivating group) is an ortho/para director.
 
I don't think so. After you add 1 Bromine to the right group, it makes the positions meta to the Bromine less reactive because Bromine (although a deactivating group) is an ortho/para director.

Bromine is a deactivating group and O/P director, and it's true that adding it to a ring deactivates the ring more, but the NH still controls where future substituents will go since it is a stronger activator...right?