i had a good foundation of general chemistry, non-calculus-based physics, and biology (have an M.S. degree) already, on top of having taken the MCAT twice before, getting a 30 (in April '04 i had 11s in both science sections). organic chemistry (failed 2nd semester and had to retake in 1998) and verbal (had a 10 in August '98, an 08 in April '04) were liabilities, but with orgo being deemphasized and blended into more biochem, and verbal being trainable, i was able to mitigate any damage those two areas could do.
so to answer your question, at least on this 3rd attempt (39S = 12 VR, 13 PS, 14 BS), nope, i didn't put in the hours you think i put in.
i'd say on an average day i put in 2-3 hours of studying. but i started in November 2005 and did this all the way 'til test day on April 22nd this year (except for the last week, i chilled a whole lot).
if you factor in practice test time and class time with TPR, i guess it ends up being a higher average time spent per day "studying." i mean, starting in February i did a test every Saturday, so that was 8 hrs right there, excluding the 2-4 hours grading and reviewing it. and Sundays were when i had TPR class, and that ran from 10 a.m. - 4 p.m. so that was a regular 6 hours of "studying" on Sundays.
i would say that studying hard means that you study smart. i did absolutely everything in TPR's syllabus, even if i knew it cold already, because you can always pick up a nuance or two that makes your understanding that much better. i also didn't skip a single class - again, each Sunday i would pick up a nugget or two of golden information that often ended up invaluable come test day.
only reading i did was to go over TPR's science review books once over, then to go over spots where i found out i hadn't understood things very well. the bulk of any reading i did, beyond actually doing practice tests and passages, was GOING OVER THE ANSWER KEY. you can't believe how many times i got a question right on the WRONG BASIS. you can be amazed at how lucky you can be sometimes. you want to minimize it so that even on Verbal, your "luck" really ends up being excellent intuition as to which answer is likely the correct one. for VR, i know, it's touchy feely crap, but that's the only way to roll with it.
including TPR's diagnostics and proctored AAMCs, i did a total of 11 full-length exams from November through April. the vast majority were done EACH and EVERY saturday starting in February. i think this was crucial to developing the rhythm and comfort you need to rock this stupid test.
if you're gonna factor in previous MCAT study time, which definitely got me at a comfortable "30" level, then yeah, i put in a $hitload of studytime. if you're just factoring in the studying i did for this attempt, then i would say that i put in a few hours a day on average, spread out over 6 months.
if you're an August dude, yeah, in two months time, to do what i did, you're gonna have to do some serious work, no matter if you're starting at a 16 or at a 32 and want to get a great score. but i'll tell ya, reinforcement happens when you also have downtime, and going out like gangbusters and putting in the hours you think you'll need to put in can end up being counterproductive. E.g., experts and research articles say all the time that folks need 8 hrs of sleep, and premed students never believe it - i totally believe it now. sleep often can do more good than that extra couple hours of studying could ever do.
also, i'm a pretty smart guy, and i pick up quick. i was out to prove something with this April '06 MCAT, and i did it. some folks need more time to grasp things, others need less. this whole thing's so subjective you have to take what i say with massive grains of salt.
UofT_475 said:
Hey, Can I ask how extensively you prepared for the MCAT? Like 6-8 or 10 hours a day of studying?