- Joined
- Apr 29, 2013
- Messages
- 486
- Reaction score
- 693
I've noticed recently that a fair number of CMGs have job postings for sites that I know to be fully staffed. Some of this might be from people retiring or leaving, but I suspect a large percentage is in order to purposefully overstaff, likely to facilitate firing "low performers". It makes the job market look better than it actually is.And we always will because of FMGs and IMGs.
Funny, the places I used to do locums, the VAs and even more so the IHS, have waitlists for applicants. It's wild.
you are perhaps missing the best reason. Start with the premise that they exist to serve their shareholders / investors.I've noticed recently that a fair number of CMGs have job postings for sites that I know to be fully staffed. Some of this might be from people retiring or leaving, but I suspect a large percentage is in order to purposefully overstaff, likely to facilitate firing "low performers". It makes the job market look better than it actually is.
Or patients. The administration only cares about what ends up in their pockets.Healthcare is a business. Like most businesses, it is not run by doctors. Don't ever think that those who are in charge, give one damn about what's best for doctors.
I didnt understand this til I was a few years out of residency. Be it HCA, your local hospital system or some other non profit. This reality needs to be fully understood by the pre meds and med student types. This isnt medicine in 1975.Or patients. The administration only cares about what ends up in their pockets.
Healthcare is a business. Like most businesses, it is not run by doctors. Don't ever think that those who are in charge, give one damn about what's best for doctors.
This is hyperbole. C'mon now.
They care about having happy physicians working for them. Why would a hospital want to piss off every physician to make an extra dollar?
I understand the sentiment, they need to balance their budget, make some profit, etc. But comments like the one made makes it seem like C-suite admins sit around every day scheming ways to take more money from physicians to put it in their pockets. And that isn't happening. Every few years when contracts are re-negotiated both sides want favorable terms, but that is normal business.
The hospital would gladly stop doing sepsis bundles if it weren't tied to CMS reimbursement. This is not the hospital's fault. Blame CMS for that.
So again, Why would a hospital want to piss off every physician to make an extra dollar?
What good is having a hospital full of employed, pissed off doctors? That hospital wouldn't last long.
Please reread what I wrote. This is not a mandate from the hospital. The hospital is forced to do this from the insurers. The hospital did not have sepsis bundles prior to the "Surviving Sepsis" campaign. C-suite is not sitting around saying "let's fuuck the doctors by forcing them to do sepsis bundles."
I know you know that it's difficult to run a business where every key employee is pissed off at the employer.
I definitely think there’s a spectrum of how much they value physicians though. Unfortunately EM seems to fall at the bottom unless there are unique circumstances that would make replacement difficult or it’s in academics. People would be up in arms if their local hospital cut ties with their oncologist or cardiologist but EM/Rads/Anes are all replaceable. Admins only seem to truly listen when they screw things up and hospital operations are impacted as a whole, looking at you, Summa.Hospitals don’t sit around thinking how they can piss off docs. Instead they think how they can make more money without any thought or consideration for physicians or patients unless it impacts their bottom line. No hospital ever was like hey we could do this and we would make extra money but the docs won’t like it So we won’t. Let’s not be gullible. They only care about docs cause they need us to keep feeding their financial machine. Nothing more or less.
It comes down to money. Ortho cardiology and neurosurgery make them tons of money. Hence they have a ton of clout.I definitely think there’s a spectrum of how much they value physicians though. Unfortunately EM seems to fall at the bottom unless there are unique circumstances that would make replacement difficult or it’s in academics. People would be up in arms if their local hospital cut ties with their oncologist or cardiologist but EM/Rads/Anes are all replaceable. Admins only seem to truly listen when they screw things up and hospital operations are impacted as a whole, looking at you, Summa.